Cases

McFADDEN, Judge. David Hewitt filed a lawsuit against Community & Southern Bank, alleging breach of contract and other claims based on a loan *714agreement. Community & Southern answered and counterclaimed to enforce a promissory note. The trial court granted summary judgment to Community & Southern as to Hewitt’s claims and as to the bank’s counterclaim.

2025 IL App (1st) 231294 FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DIVISION September 16, 2025 No. 1-23-1294 _________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

INMAN, Judge. *438 Robin Lee Hewitt, individually and as trustee of the Robin Lee Hewitt Revocable Trust ("Defendant"), appeals a judgment resulting from a jury verdict in favor of Gail Lee Hewitt ("Plaintiff") on a claim of constructive fraud. Defendant contends the trial court erred in den

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. SBC challenges a Federal Communications Commission order finding that SBC (through various affiliates) violated the terms of a requirement, imposed as a condition to the FCC’s approval of a merger between SBC and Ameritech, that SBC “offer” interve

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. Consolidated with 03-1281 This cause was considered on petitions for review of orders of the Federal Communications Commission and were briefed and argued by counsel. It is Ordered and Adjudged that the petitions for review of the orders of the Federal Communications Commission are hereby denied. Petitioner Vista Communicatio

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge: Mountain Communications, Inc. is a paging carrier that petitions for review of an FCC order dismissing its complaint against Qwest-the local exchange carrier (LEC) serving the areas where Mountain operates-for charging petitioner two types of fees. The dispute between the carriers as to one of the fees evaporated

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge GREGORY joined. *314 KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Core Communications, Inc. appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment to defendant Verizon Maryland, LLC, súccessor to Ver

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND THE PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 15-MAR-2023 09:06 AM

People v Hewitt (2022 NY Slip Op 00079) People v Hewitt 2022 NY Slip Op 00079 Decided on January 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 16-FEB-2021 07:47 AM Dkt. 54 OP IN THE INTERMEDI

792 Argued and submitted June 20, affirmed November 27, 2019, petition for review denied February 20, 2020 (366 Or 205) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHANE WILLIAM HEWITT, Defendant-Appellant. Malheur County Circuit Court 17CR13809, 15CR1493;

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Allure Medical Spa, PLLC ("Allure") has filed a Motion for Recusal or *763Disqualification of Judge (the "Recusal Motion"). (See ECF #45.) For the reasons explained below, the motion is DENIED . I A

TATEL, Circuit Judge: Acting pursuant to a 1996 Telecommunications Act provision designed to promote competition in the payphone service industry, the Federal Communications Commission issued an order requiring the Bell operating companies (BOCs) to price the service lines used by payphone service providers at forward-looking cost-based rates. In these consolidated cases, two groups of petitioners challenge the order from oppo

[Cite as Hewitt v. Hewitt, 2009-Ohio-6525.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY PAUL HEWITT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, -and- CASE NO. 14-08-48 TERRI HEWITT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. OPINION MINDY M. HEWITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

[Cite as State v. Hewitt, 2015-Ohio-5489.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MIAMI COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2015-CA-5 : v.

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM These causes were heard on the record from the Federal Communications Com*12mission and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. For the reasons set forth below, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal in No. 04-1056 and the petition for review in No. 04-1057 are denied. Preston W. Small

Case: 19-20023 Document: 00516008345 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 9, 2021

JUDGMENT This cause was considered on a petition for review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission and was briefed by counsel. The Court has determined that the issues presented do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). For the reasons stated in the Commission’s order, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. We note, however, tha

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH. GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge. This matter involves the use of an accounting rule, “add-back,” in a complex area of regulation addressing the rates charged by local telephone exchange carriers for access to their networks. Its resolution, however, is relatively straightforward because, at its core, petitio

Judgment rendered August 9, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 55,131-KW COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** S