Cases

c. Establish new state House and state Senate districting plans that comply with the North Carolina Constitution, if the North Carolina General Assembly fails to enact new state House and state Senate districting plans comporting with the North Carolina Constitution in a timely manner; *508d. Grant Plaintiffs such other and f

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19–1091 COMMON CAUSE; NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY; PAULA ANN CHAPMAN; HOWARD DUBOSE; GEORGE DAVID GAUCK; JAMES MACKIN NESBIT; DWIGHT JORDAN; JOSEPH THOMAS GATES; MARK S. PETERS; PAMELA MORTON; VIRGINIA WALTERS BRIEN; JOHN MARK TURNER; LEON CHARLES SCHALLER; REBECCA HARPER; LESLEY BROOK WISCHMANN; DAVID

504 F.Supp.2d 1333 (2007) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc., Bertha B. Young, and Eugene Taylor, Plaintif

558 F.3d 249 (2009) COMMON CAUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA; The League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania; Representative Gregory Vitali; Tim Potts; Carl H. Silverman; William R. Koch; H. William McIntyre, Appellants v. Commonwealth of PENNSYLVANIA; Edward G. Rendell, Governor; Robert P. Casey III; David G. Argall; David J. Brightbill; H. William DeWeese; Robert C. Jubelirer; Robert J. Mellow; John M. Perzel; Samuel H. Smith; Michael Veon; Ralph J. Cappy.

Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2491 Voters and other plaintiffs in North Carolina and Maryland challenged their States' congressional districting maps as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders. The North Carolina plaintiffs complained that the State's distric

Before WYNN, Circuit Judge, and OSTEEN, District Judge, and BRITT, Senior District Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION WYNN, Circuit Judge, wrote the opinion, in which BRITT, Senior District Judge, concurred. *799TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...801 A. T

PER CURIAM: *782In a memorandum opinion and order entered January 9, 2018 (the "Order"), this Court held that North Carolina's 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan (the "2016 Plan") constitutes an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the First Amendment, and Article I o

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, two groups of Plaintiffs1 allege that North Carolina’s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan (the “Plan”) constitutes an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander in violation of the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and, in the case of the Common Cause Plaintiffs, Article I, Sec

439 F.Supp.2d 1294 (2006) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF GEORGIA, INC., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of *1295 Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, I

Justice VOLLACK concurring in part and dissenting in part: While I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court properly dismissed Common Cause’s complaint for in-junctive relief, I disagree with the conclusion in part IV(B) of the majority opinion that this case should be remanded for consideration of Common Cause’s complaint for declaratory relief.

554 F.3d 1340 (2009) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, et al., Plaintiffs, The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Eugene Taylor, Bertha Barrett Young, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ms. Evon BILLUPS, Superintendent of Elections for the Board of Elections and Voter Registration for Floyd County and the City of Rome, Georgia, Ms. Tracy Brown, Superintendent of Elections of

406 F.Supp.2d 1326 (2005) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc., and the following qualified and regist

Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-26-2009 Common Cause PA v. Comm PA Precedential or Non

447 F.Supp.2d 415 (2006) COMMON CAUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Commonwealth of PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-2036. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. June 12, 2006. *416 *417 *418 Paul Anthony Rossi,

[Cite as State v. Lewis, 2025-Ohio-2454.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114511 : v.

NO. 07-03-0346-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A SEPTEMBER 16, 2005 ______________________________ VERNON R. YOUNG, JR., APPELLANT

12/18/2024 DA 23-0575 Case Number: DA 23-0575 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2024 MT 312 RIKKI HELD; LANDER B., by and through his guardian Sara Busse; BADGE B., by and through his guardian Sara Busse; SA

[J-5-2025] [MO: Dougherty, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 37 EAP 2024 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court at No. 1721 EDA

FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit October 8, 2015 Blaine F. Bates NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Case Summary BRADFORD, Judge. [1] In December of 2012, Sharon Clearwaters died as a result of medical complications after taking Levofloxacin. In November of 2013, Appellant-Plaintiff David Shelton, in his position as personal representative for Clearwaters’s estate, filed a proposed complaint with the Indiana Department of Insurance (“IDI”) against Appe