Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19–1091 COMMON CAUSE; NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY; PAULA ANN CHAPMAN; HOWARD DUBOSE; GEORGE DAVID GAUCK; JAMES MACKIN NESBIT; DWIGHT JORDAN; JOSEPH THOMAS GATES; MARK S. PETERS; PAMELA MORTON; VIRGINIA WALTERS BRIEN; JOHN MARK TURNER; LEON CHARLES SCHALLER; REBECCA HARPER; LESLEY BROOK WISCHMANN; DAVID

c. Establish new state House and state Senate districting plans that comply with the North Carolina Constitution, if the North Carolina General Assembly fails to enact new state House and state Senate districting plans comporting with the North Carolina Constitution in a timely manner; *508d. Grant Plaintiffs such other and f

Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2491 Voters and other plaintiffs in North Carolina and Maryland challenged their States' congressional districting maps as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders. The North Carolina plaintiffs complained that the State's distric

554 F.3d 1340 (2009) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, et al., Plaintiffs, The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Eugene Taylor, Bertha Barrett Young, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ms. Evon BILLUPS, Superintendent of Elections for the Board of Elections and Voter Registration for Floyd County and the City of Rome, Georgia, Ms. Tracy Brown, Superintendent of Elections of

504 F.Supp.2d 1333 (2007) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc., Bertha B. Young, and Eugene Taylor, Plaintif

558 F.3d 249 (2009) COMMON CAUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA; The League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania; Representative Gregory Vitali; Tim Potts; Carl H. Silverman; William R. Koch; H. William McIntyre, Appellants v. Commonwealth of PENNSYLVANIA; Edward G. Rendell, Governor; Robert P. Casey III; David G. Argall; David J. Brightbill; H. William DeWeese; Robert C. Jubelirer; Robert J. Mellow; John M. Perzel; Samuel H. Smith; Michael Veon; Ralph J. Cappy.

Before WYNN, Circuit Judge, and OSTEEN, District Judge, and BRITT, Senior District Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION WYNN, Circuit Judge, wrote the opinion, in which BRITT, Senior District Judge, concurred. *799TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...801 A. T

PER CURIAM: *782In a memorandum opinion and order entered January 9, 2018 (the "Order"), this Court held that North Carolina's 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan (the "2016 Plan") constitutes an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the First Amendment, and Article I o

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, two groups of Plaintiffs1 allege that North Carolina’s 2016 Congressional Redistricting Plan (the “Plan”) constitutes an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander in violation of the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and, in the case of the Common Cause Plaintiffs, Article I, Sec

439 F.Supp.2d 1294 (2006) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF GEORGIA, INC., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of *1295 Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, I

Justice VOLLACK concurring in part and dissenting in part: While I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court properly dismissed Common Cause’s complaint for in-junctive relief, I disagree with the conclusion in part IV(B) of the majority opinion that this case should be remanded for consideration of Common Cause’s complaint for declaratory relief.

Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-26-2009 Common Cause PA v. Comm PA Precedential or Non

406 F.Supp.2d 1326 (2005) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc., and the following qualified and regist

447 F.Supp.2d 415 (2006) COMMON CAUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Commonwealth of PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-2036. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. June 12, 2006. *416 *417 *418 Paul Anthony Rossi,

NUMBER 13-17-00491-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG JONATHAN DAVID LEWIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 130th District Court of Matagorda County

Opinion for the court by Associate Judge MCLEESE, joined by GLICKMAN, FISHER, BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, and THOMPSON, Associate Judges. Dissenting opinion by Associate Judge BECKWITH, joined by WASHINGTON, Chief Judge, and EASTERLY, Associate Judge, at page 251. MCLEESE, Associate Judge: The United States seeks review of the trial court’s pretrial order suppres

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 11-2012 D AVID L. L EWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L ARRY M ILLS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 2:09-cv-02090-MPM—Michael P. McCuskey, Judge.

PRATT, District Judge. David L. Lewis is a former part-time police officer for the Village of Belgium, Illinois — a town of just over 400 people. On January 6, 2010, Lewis filed a one-count Amended Complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 against four *327 defendants who allegedly particip

[Cite as State v. Lewis, 2025-Ohio-2454.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114511 : v.

Jasopersaud v Lewis (2023 NY Slip Op 06242) Jasopersaud v Lewis 2023 NY Slip Op 06242 Decided on December 6, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <