Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Committee of Five v. Sullivan”
Berge v. School Committee of Gloucesterpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1954 INGE BERGE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF GLOUCESTER; BEN LUMMIS, in his personal capacity; ROBERTA A. EASON, in her personal capacity; and STEPHANIE DELISI, in her personal capacity, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRI
OPINION DANIELS, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION {1} We accepted certification from the Court of Appeals to review the decision of the New Mexico Cultural Properties Review Committee to recognize approximately 400.000 acres of public land on Mount T aylor as a registered cultural property unde
|,SUS AN M. CHEHARDY, Judge. This is an appeal by a rider of a parade float from a summary judgment dismissing most of the defendants in her personal injury suit. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. Billie Tauzier was a rider on Float Number 14, “It’s About Time,” in the Metairie St. Patrick’s Day Parade on March 14, 1998. Shortly after the parade began, as the line of floats was moving down
North Reading School Committee v. Bureau of Special Education Appeals of the Massachusetts Department of Educationpublic domain
480 F.Supp.2d 479 (2007) NORTH READING SCHOOL COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS OF the MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Massachusetts Department of Education, and Courtney and Timothy G., as Parents and next friend of M.G., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-11162-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 30, 2007.
Jane Sullivan v. University of Washingtonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANE SULLIVAN; P. POES, 1-75; No. 22-35338 Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, D.C. No. 2:22- cv-00204-RAJ Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation; ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Record
Thomas Sullivan v. City of University Citypublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE THOMAS SULLIVAN, ET AL., ) No. ED111084 ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs
490 F.Supp.2d 49 (2007) MANCHESTER-ESSEX REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Massachusetts Department of Education, and Patricia Spellman as Parent and Next Friend of D.T., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-10922-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 9, 2007.<
United States v. Sullivanpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-927 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:20-cr-00337- WHO-1 v. JOSEPH SULLIVAN, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United Stat
Lawyers' Committee v. Garlandpublic domain
21-1338-cv Lawyers’ Committee v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2021 ARGUED: JANUARY 21, 2022 DECIDED: AUGUST 5, 2022 No. 21-1338-cv Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc., Richard Gage, Christopher Gioia, Diana
Mills v. Statewide Grievance Committeepublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Sullivan v. Pike & Susan Sullivan Found.public domain
KAUTZ, Justice. [¶1] Appellant Susan W. Sullivan and her late-husband Pike Sullivan established and funded the Pike and Susan Sullivan Foundation, *308a Wyoming nonprofit corporation (the Foundation). The Sullivans and their friend and attorney, George Harris, served as directors of the Foundation until Mr. Sullivan passed away in 2013, at whic
Dempsey Sullivan v. Estate of Samuel Maddoxpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-00418-COA CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2011-CT-00820-COA DEMPSEY SULLIVAN, BILLIE JOYCE APPELLANTS/ SULLIVAN, AND TERRELL STUBBS, CROSS-APPELLEES INDIVIDUALLY v. ESTATE OF SAMUEL MADDOX APPELLEE/
Sullivan v. BitterSweet Ranch, LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49678 In the Matter of: Wylie Street Emergency ) Fund. ) ----------------------------------------------------------- ) Boise, May 2023 Term INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE ) (IRC), Trustee of the Wylie Street Emergency ) Opinion filed: September 12, 2023 Fund,
Suarez v. Sullivanpublic domain
24-872 Suarez v. Sullivan, et al. United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2024 Argued: March 31, 2025 Decided: March 17, 2026 No. 24-872 ELVIN SUAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Peck v. Statewide Grievance Committeepublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
United States v. Sullivan, Bilda, Rankinpublic domain
23-6559-cr(L) United States v. Sullivan, Bilda, Rankin UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ___________________________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: May 13, 2024 Decided: September 6, 2024 Docket Nos. 23-6559, 23-6608, 23-6609, 23-7875, 23-7882, 23-7887, 24-91 ____________
Official Committee of Unsecure v. Rudolph Randapublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 13-2881, 13-3353, 13-3495 JEROME E. LISTECKI, as Trustee of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Cemetery Perpetual Care Trust Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS,
Ruther v. Democratic National Committeepublic domain
FIE.ED APR"3»I] 2019 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT C|€fk, U-S- D|Sfficf_& Bankfupfcy FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the Dlstrlct of Co|umb|a L RUTHER, § l Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. l : l 9-cv-01068 (UNA) DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL § COMMITTEE, ) , Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.
Massing, J. Defendant Hanover Woods, LLC (developer), filed an application with the plaintiff zoning board of appeals of Hanover (board) for a comprehensive permit to build a 152-unit mixed-income housing project. Considering the board’s filing fee to be unreasonable, however, the developer paid only what it unilaterally
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civ. Action No. 18-645 U.S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND (EGS) BUDGET, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiffs the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and the