Cases

OPINION WATT, Justice: PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1 Plaintiff/Appellant Sheila Yvonne Ber-man sought assistance from the Oklahoma *69Department of Human Services (DHS), to determine paternity and to collect child support. She alleged Herbert White, Jr. was the father of her child. DHS brought an administrative action to determine paterni

Opinion issued December 31, 2024. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00043-CV ——————————— THE STATE OF TEXAS AND NPT ASSOCIATES, Appellants V. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA

OSCN Found Document:COMBS v. BAYER AG et al. COMBS v. BAYER AG et al.2026 OK CIV APP 17Case Number: 123431Decided: 05/11/2026Mandate Issued: 06/11/2026COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DIVISION II Cite as: 2026 OK CIV APP 17, __ P.3d __ GINGER CASPER COMBS, Plaintiff/Ap

873 N.E.2d 692 (2007) LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant-Defendant, v. Donna COMBS, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A05-0608-CV-436. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 20, 2007. *696 Paul R. Garry, Peter Petrakis, Rachel S. Urquhart, Meckler Bulger & Tilson LLP, Chicago, IL, Michael L. Carter, Spangler, Jennings &

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. The False Claims Act (or the "Act") allows for the recovery of civil penalties *736 and treble damages from anyone who defrauds the government by submitting fraudulent claims for payment.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Transfer RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to transfer venue *27 pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. Harold R. Fine filed this qui tam action against Sandia Corporation (Sandia), which operates Sandia National Laboratory under a contract with the United States Department of Energy (DOE). Mr. Fine alleges that Sandia misappropriated nuclear waste funds in violation of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA). The district court dismissed the ac

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge. Presently before this court are the 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 20) filed by Defendant Todd Wanek (hereinafter “Def. Wanek’s 12(b)(2) Mot. to Dismiss”) and the 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss Design Resources, Inc.’s Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 26) filed by Defendant Dr. Nicholas J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge. This dispute between two competing providers of a specialized insurance service arises from a confidentiality and licensing agreement whereby one of the providers agreed to license its proprietary software for administering the service to the other provider. The agreement between the licensor and the licensee further provided that the licensor agree

Cuéllar, J. *154 Under California law, a brand-name drug manufacturer has a duty to warn of known or reasonably knowable adverse effects arising from an individual's use of its drug. (See Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1973)

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19‐1528 & 19‐1613 EPIC SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant‐Appellee/Cross‐Appellant, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. & TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORP. d/b/a TCS AMERICA, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs‐Appellants/Cross‐Appellees. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19‐1528 & 19‐1613 EPIC SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant‐Appellee/Cross‐Appellant, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. & TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORP. d/b/a TCS AMERICA, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs‐Appellants/Cross‐Appellees. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19-1528 & 19-1613 EPIC SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. & TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORP. d/b/a TCS AMERICA, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19‐1528 & 19‐1613 EPIC SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant‐Appellee/Cross‐Appellant, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. & TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORP. d/b/a TCS AMERICA, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs‐Appellants/Cross‐Appellees. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19‐1528 & 19‐1613 EPIC SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant‐Appellee/Cross‐Appellant, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. & TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORP. d/b/a TCS AMERICA, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs‐Appellants/Cross‐Appellees. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19‐1528 & 19‐1613 EPIC SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant‐Appellee/Cross‐Appellant, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. & TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORP. d/b/a TCS AMERICA, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs‐Appellants/Cross‐Appellees. ____________________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19-1528 & 19-1613 EPIC SYSTEMS CORP., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. & TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL CORP. d/b/a TCS AMERICA, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. ____________________

448 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2006) The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Abbott Molecular Inc., and Abbott Laboratories Inc., Plaintiffs, v. DAKO NORTH AMERICA, INC. and Dako A/S, Defendants. No. C 05-03955 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 1, 2006. *1146 *1147 Carolyn C

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III: SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Nick Garin Trucking (Garin Trucking), a sole proprietorship owned by Nick Garin, challenges the District Court’s entry of, and subsequent refusal to vacate, a default judgment against it. We conclude that appellees’ attempted utilization of the new fede

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX