Cases

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree with my respected colleagues that Pinpoint's appeal provides no basis upon which to reverse the ruling of the bankruptcy court refusing to lift the automatic stay. I nevertheless dissent from the judgment of dismissal, because this court should decide this case by ruling on the merits, rather than by creating a circuit split in order to find the challenged order of t

ORDER AND AMENDED MEMORANDUM *** This matter is before the Court on a “motion to vacate and/or stay the mandate to correct error regarding personal jurisdiction over Ying Zuo,” filed on behalf of defendant-appellee Ying Zuo. We construe this motion as a motion to recall the mandate issued on April 18, 2013. This Court may exercise its authority to recall its mandate for “good cause” or to “prevent injustic

OPINION AND ORDER EATON, Judge: This matter is before the court on the USCIT Rule 56.2 motion for judgment upon the agency record of plaintiffs Tianjin Machinery Import & Export Corp. (“TMC”) and Shandong Huarong Machinery Co., Ltd. (“Huarong”). By their motion, plaintiffs challenge certain aspects of the United States Department of Comme

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1041 Doc: 60 Filed: 03/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 31 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1041 INTERPROFESSION DU GRUYERE; SYNDICAT INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU GRUYERE, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. U. S. DAIRY EXPORT C

ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.1 Also before the Court are plaintiffs’ motions to deem in rem jurisdiction perfected2 or, in the alternative, to issue a warrant for arrest3 and to appoint a consent guardian.

OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge. Before the Court is the Motion of Microsoft Corporation (“Defendant”) to dismiss for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the Complaint of TI Investment Services, LLC (“TI”), and World Phone Internet Services, Pvt. Ltd. (“World Phone”), (collectively “Plaintiffs”), which includes claims for violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act and

Kelly, Judge: This action is before the court on a motion for judgment on the agency record challenging various aspects of the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") final determination in the eleventh administrative review of the antidumping duty ("ADD") order covering certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam ("Vietnam"). SeeCertain Frozen Fish Fillets From [Vietnam],

702 F.Supp.2d 320 (2010) ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHINA NATIONAL METALS & MINERALS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 05-4376(GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 1, 2010. *325 Robert A. Magnanini, Esq., Stone and Magnanini, LLP, Richard E. Donovan, E

948 F.Supp. 1570 (1996) GODIX EQUIPMENT EXPORT CORP., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Angel L. GONZALEZ d/b/a Universal Service Co., Plaintiff, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Nos. 93-1624-CIV, 93-1557-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. November 14, 1996

596 F.Supp.2d 842 (2008) ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHINA NATIONAL METALS & MINERALS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 05-4376 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 30, 2008. *845 David S. Stone, Robert A. Magnanini, Esqs. (Boies, Schiller & Fle

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. A suit in the Court of International Trade under 19 U.S.C. § 1515 (1988) challenging the denial of a protest concerning the customs classification of imported merchandise is begun by filing a summons. The summons form provides space for listing the entry numbers (the number assigned to merchandise upon entry into this country) of the merchandise a

Kelly, Judge: *1352Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") remand redetermination filed pursuant to the court's decision in An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company v. United States, 41 CIT ----,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1915 (JEB) EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In round two of this Freedom of Information Act bout, the parties return to the Court to dispute the updated document

Slip Op. No. 25-56 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BONNEY FORGE CORPORATION and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, Plaintiffs, Before: Stephen Alexander Vaden, v. Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 1:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1915 (JEB) EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case involves two Freedom of Information Act requests submitted by Plaintiff Cause of Action Institute, a self-sty

OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the following filings: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 4); (2) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12); (3) Pl

OPINION AND ORDER EATON, Judge: This matter is before the court on the motion for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2 of plaintiffs Zhejiang Native Produce & Animal By-Products Import & Export Corp. (“Zhejiang”), Kunshan Foreign Trade Co. (“Kunshan”),

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 3, 2023 Decided July 26, 2024 No. 22-1052 AMAZON SERVICES LLC, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Agriculture William Brendan Murphy argued the caus

FILED Jun 09 2023, 8:57 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

OPINION AND ORDER Kelly, Judge This consolidated action comes before the court on USCIT Rule 56.2 motions for judgment on the agency record, challenging the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) determination in the ninth administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (“Vietnam”). See Certain Frozen Fish