Cases

COLLINS, J. *266Plaintiffs Marline Petitpas1 and Joseph Petitpas sued Ford Motor Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Rossmoor Corporation,2 and others, alleging that exposure to asbestos caused by these defendants resulted in Marline's mesothelioma. Motions for summary adjudication were g

OPINION AND ORDER MARCOS E. LÓPEZ, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Procedural History On June 9, 2010 the United States of America (the “government” or “plaintiff’) filed a complaint along with a statement made under penalty of perjury in support of the same (the “affidavit”) by José I. Cruz Pillich, a special agent for ICE (“Agent Pillich”), to institute a civil in rem actio

CARL J. BARBIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *564Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 60) filed by Defendant, Stewart Title Guaranty Company ("STG"). Plaintiff, BJD Properties, LLC ("BJD"), has filed an opposition. (Rec. Doc. 73). Considering the Motion, the record, and the law, the Court find

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. Defendants’ motions to dismiss the second amended complaint for failure to state a claim came on for hearing before this court on December 5, 2012. Plaintiff Suzanne D. Jackson appeared by her counsel Alan H. Kaufman and Robert J. Stumpf; defendants Jon Sabes, Steven Sabes, and Marvin Siegel appeared by their counsel Tanya Herrera;

Dillard, Judge. RM Kids, LLC, filed suit against Old Republic National Title Insurance Company (“Old Republic”), alleging, inter alia, breach of contract and bad faith refusal to pay a claim under a policy of lender’s title insurance issued by Old Republic. Following a lengthy trial, a jury rendered a verdict in favor of RM Kids and awarded $7,100,000 in damages. Shortly thereafte

166 F.Supp.2d 1237 (2001) Philip S. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. CASIO PHONEMATE, INC., Asahi Corporation, and Casio Computer Co., Ltd., Defendants. No. 98 C 6250. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 17, 2001. *1238 *1239 Timothy M. McCarthy, Raiford A. Blackstone, J

111 P.3d 521 (2005) GUARANTY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LaSALLE NATIONAL BANK ASSOCIATION and California Federal Bank, a division of Citibank West, FSB, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03CA1309. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. October 7, 2004. Rehearing Denied February 10, 2005. Certiorari Granted May 16, 2005. P

Filed 7/5/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR B245037 JOSEPH PETITPAS, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC473216 JCCP4674) v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al.

225 F.Supp.2d 1199 (2002) THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S., et al. Plaintiffs, v. Bill LOCKYER, et al., Defendants. No. SA CV 02-0377 GLT. United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division. September 16, 2002. *1200 *1201 Stephen P. Pepe, Brent J. North, Renee M. Spigarelli,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 23, 2008 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARTHA ANN FREEMAN AND RAFAEL DEJESUS ROCHA-PEREZ Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2005-C-2044 J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., Judge No. M2006-02751-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 28, 2008 A Davidson County jury convic

47 Cal.App.4th 1168 (1996) JOSEPH DONOHUE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SANTA PAULA WEST MOBILE HOME PARK et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B099368. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. July 29, 1996. *1172 COUNSEL Richard A. Weinstock for Plaintiffs and Appellants. All

640 N.E.2d 1000 (1994) 267 Ill. App.3d 69 203 Ill.Dec. 850 MAHER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QUALITY CABINETS, a Division of Texwood Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-93-0700. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. September 29, 1994. Rehearing Denied November 2, 1994. <

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 92-1758 FOCUS INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 92-1758 FOCUS INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. No. 92-1766 FOCUS INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Plain

STAHL, Circuit Judge. In these cross-appeals, we explore, inter alia, the parameters of a title insurance company’s duty to disclose title defects to its insured, a lender-mortgagee. The district court, finding that no such duty existed, granted a post-judgment motion for judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant American Title Insurance Co. (“Ameri

OPINION ANDEWELT, Judge. BACKGROUND I. In these consolidated patent actions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), plaintiff, Charles E. Pfund, seeks compensation from the United States for the alleged unauthorized use of the claimed invention covered by U.S. Patent Nos. 4,279,036 (the ’036 patent), 4,664,518 (the ’518 patent), and 4,764,982 (the ’9

OPINION. Tkain, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in the petitioner’s income tax in the amounts and for the years as follows: Year Deficiencies 1948 _$12,596. 0T 1950 _ 19,676.39 1953 _ 10,966.83 1954 _ 14,314.59</

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2823-16 PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, April 29, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION v