Cases

[Cite as State v. Tidwell, 2021-Ohio-1286.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN B. TIDWELL, Defendant-Ap

ORDER MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge: Plaintiff in this military pay case seeks compensation in the form of back disability retirement pay for her deceased husband, Major (Chaplain) Connor G. Cole. Plaintiff filed her complaint in this court after the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (the AFBCMR or the Board) denied her application to correct Major Cole’s records to reflect that he was ret

*1019ORDER MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge: This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks compensation in the form of back disability retirement pay for decedent, Conner G. Cole, claiming that the United States Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records’ decision not to change the personnel records

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE ON REMAND RALPH R. BEISTLINE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Greenpeace, Inc., and Cascadia Wildlands Project (“Plaintiffs”) move for an order enforcing the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the amended judgment of this Court regarding the United States Forest Service’s (“Forest S

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 12, 2016 DEMARCUS KEYON COLE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-15-183 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge No. W2015-01901-CCA-R3-PC - Filed May 11, 2016 The petitioner, Demarcus Keyon Cole, acting pro se, appeals the post-conviction court‟s denia

564 F.Supp.2d 831 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Norman COLE, Defendant. No. 04 CR 889-1. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 7, 2008. James Peter Fieweger, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. Nor

OPINION TODD, Presiding Judge. The plaintiff, Lue Etta Hallmark, has appealed from the non-jury dismissal of her suit to have herself declared the owner of certain land because of her occupation and use of same for over twenty years. -The Facts- On May 2, 1961, plaintiff and her husband (now deceased) recorded their deed to a tract of approximately one acre on the Lore

Sheila and Billy R. Cole were divorced on April 8, 1987. After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court awarded the homeplace to the husband and awarded to the wife a lot and trailer at Smith Lake and a lot and trailer at Laguna Beach, Florida. The court gave the wife the right to receive one half of the husband's retirement and pension benefits accrued as of the divorce, when the husband retired, terminated the plan, or withdrew the funds. The husband was also ordered to pay to the wife

233 F.Supp.2d 1097 (2002) Araceli G. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. COLE SEWELL CORPORATION, a/k/a New Cole Sewell Corporation, Tim Nichols,[1] and Brad Worrall, Defendants. No. C 01-3052-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. December 6, 2002. *1098 *1099

92 Ga. App. 54 (1955) 87 S.E.2d 657 TIDWELL v. TIDWELL et al. 35664. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided May 18, 1955. *56 W. B. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error. H. D. Sosebee, Harris, Russell, Weaver & Watkins, Bell & Bell, John D. Comer, contra. QUILLIAN, J. T

The appeal is from a final decree and that affirming the register's report. The facts succinctly stated are that Cole and Yearwood were partners doing business as R. L. Cole Horse Mule Company; they took notes and mortgages to secure sales and hypothecated the same to the banks indicated; appellant Cole executed a note and chattel mortgage to complainant Yearwood for $10,000, in settlement of their business affairs, and at the same time, Yearwood executed and delivered to Cole the fol

In the circuit court of Warren county, the appellant, Fritz Cole, was convicted of the murder of Pat Henry, Jr., and was sentenced to be hanged. The testimony shows that the appellant and one George Whitaker and Pat Henry, Jr., were friends, and had been for many years. For several hours preceding the killing, the appellant and Whitaker were together attending a ball game and riding in Whitaker's automobile. About seven o'clock P.M. they drove to the home of a young lady, where Pat Hen

DOWD, Judge. Defendant appeals from a conviction on each of three counts of robbery in the first degree by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon. Sections 560.120 and 560.135 RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. Defendant makes no challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. We recite the facts briefly. On Sunday, November 5, 1972, in the afternoon three young boys took the bus to Ninth and Washington in St. Louis to at

124 Cal.App.2d 64 (1954) BLAIR H. TIDWELL, Respondent, v. VIOLET HENRICKS, Appellant. Civ. No. 19925. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. One. Mar. 23, 1954. Juaneita M. Veron for Appellant. Walleck, Olstyn & Johnson and Robert F. Johnson for Respondent. DORAN, J. This is an appeal from the order denying the defendant's mo

ATKINS, District Judge: Appellant, American Key Corporation 1 (American Key) seeks reversal (a) of *1572 summary judgments entered in behalf of the appellees, Cole National Corporation (Cole) and Sears, Roebuck &

9 F.3d 461w 63 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 721,63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,678Russell AIKEN; Frank Amato, Charles Barnes; KennonCarlton; Danny Carter; Tammy Clevenger; J.R. Coatney;Steve Comella; H.J. Essary; Bryant Jennings; PaulKeating; Barry Lane; Russell Lollar; A.E. Locke; MarkMcClain; Frank McGowan; Danny O'Connor; Monte Perkins;Allen S. Rawie; Rick Sansom; E. Lawrence Smith; DanaStine; Robert J.

Eussell, Chief Justice. D. M. Cole, as trustee in bankruptcy of J. E. Eowe, instituted his equitable action against the bankrupt and his wife, seeking to have set aside and canceled a certain deed from the husband to the wife. He alleged that such deed was made to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of J. E. Eowe. By her answer the wife practically placed herself in the position *

*443ORDER MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Senior Judge. This action is brought by former employees of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) under the Separation Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5597 (1994). Plaintiffs assert that defendant promised separation pay incentives to AAFES employees who applied for involuntary early retirement and retired after the Depa

758 F.Supp.2d 389 (2010) VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC., et al. v. SAP AMERICA, INC. and SAP, AG. Case No. 2:07-CV-153-CE. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. December 21, 2010. *391 Samuel Franklin Baxter, McKool Smith, Marshall, TX, Douglas Carleton Edwards, Joel Lance Thollander, John Michael Shumaker, Joshua

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s denial of their request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we need not recount it here. “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on th