⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Cole v. American Specialty Health Network, Inc.”

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 16, 2013 Session GEORGE R. VRANEY, M.D. v. MEDICAL SPECIALTY CLINIC, P.C. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 65204 Tony A. Childress, Chancellor by Interchange No. W2012-02144-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 9, 2013 This is a breach of contract case. Appellant, a medical doctor, was h
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TORRENT PHARMA, INC., ) QBE UNDERWRITERS LTD., ) LIBERTY CORPORATE CAPITAL ) LTD., HAMILTON MANAGEMENT ) AGENCY LTD., RIVERSTONE ) MANAGING AGENCY LTD., BRIT ) SYNDICATES LTD., and ARGO ) MANAGING AGENCY LTD., ) C.A. No. N18C-05-094 CEB
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2014-07-31 · Published · cited 25× · 117 Fed. Cl. 137
United States Transportation Command; Past Performance Evaluation; Performance Price Tradeoff; Commercial Marketplace; Global Privately-Owned Vehicle Contract. OPINION HORN, J. Protestor, American Auto Logistics, LP, filed a post-award bid protest on February 5, 2014, challenging the award by the United States Transportation Command
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3663 ___________________________ John S. Hahn, Special Master Bader Farms, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellee Bill Bader
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-10-07 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-2453 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, th
District Court, D. Maine · 2008-01-02 · Published · cited 13× · 532 F. Supp. 2d 153; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 309; 2007 WL 4480639
532 F.Supp.2d 153 (2007) IMS HEALTH CORP., et al., Plaintiffs v. G. Steven ROWE, Attorney General of the State of Maine, Defendant. No. CV-07-127-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 21, 2007. As Amended January 2, 2008. *154 *155
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-08-12 · Published · cited 10× · 45 F.4th 479
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1492 AZURITY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. EDGE PHARMA, LLC, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-12-09 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN DOE, One; JOHN DOE, Two; No. 19-15074 JOHN DOE, Three; JOHN DOE, Four; on behalf of themselves and all D.C. No. others similarly situated; JOHN DOE, 3:18-cv-01031- Five, EMC Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION CVS PHARMACY, INC.; CAREMARK, LLC; CAREMARK CALIFORNIA SPE
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-12-09 · Published · cited 89× · 982 F.3d 1204
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN DOE, One; JOHN DOE, Two; No. 19-15074 JOHN DOE, Three; JOHN DOE, Four; on behalf of themselves and all D.C. No. others similarly situated; JOHN DOE, 3:18-cv-01031- Five, EMC Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION CVS PHARMACY, INC.; CAREMARK, LLC; CAREMARK CALIFORNIA SPE
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008-09-26 · Published · cited 28× · 255 F.R.D. 179; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74431; 2008 WL 4453108
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The plaintiffs in this case are reinsurance companies (the “Reinsurers”)1 seeking to compel arbitration of certain disputes relating to, or to obtain a declaratory judgment establishing, the rights and liabilities arising from reinsurance certificates. The defendants are Huntsman Corporation (“Huntsman”), the insured, an
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-12-12 · Published · cited 2× · 348 F. Supp. 3d 967
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs bring this putative class action alleging that they have been discriminatorily denied benefits under their employer-offered prescription drug benefit plans. The complaint names two sets of defendants: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Caremark, LLC., and Caremark California Specialty Pharmacy, LLC (collectively "CVS"), and Amtrak, Lowe's Companies, and Time Warner, Inc. (collectively "Employ
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-12-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00114-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS NO. 15-24-00114-CV 12/9/2025 4:20 PM CHRISTOPHE
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-12-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00114-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/9/2025 6:21 PM No. 15-24-00114-CV CHRISTOPHE
California Court of Appeal · 2016-10-28 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/28/16 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VIRGINIA BIGLER-ENGLER, as D063556 Administrator, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. GIC870982) BREG, INC. et al., Defendants and Appe
District Court, N.D. California · 2001-01-29 · Published · cited 9× · 130 F. Supp. 2d 1109; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4673; 2001 WL 98391
130 F.Supp.2d 1109 (2001) State of CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, v. SUTTER HEALTH SYSTEM, Alta Bates Medical Center, and Summit Medical Center, Defendants. No. C99-03803 MMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. January 29, 2001. *1110 *1111 SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: ORDER D
California Court of Appeal · 2020-09-02 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 9/2/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE FLAGSHIP THEATRES OF PALM B292609 DESERT, LLC, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. SC090481) v. CENTURY THEATRES, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.
California Court of Appeal · 2020-10-02 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/2/20 (on rehearing) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE FLAGSHIP THEATRES OF B292609 PALM DESERT, LLC, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. SC090481) v. CENTURY THEATRES, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellant
District Court, N.D. California · 2000-01-05 · Published · cited 3× · 84 F. Supp. 2d 1057; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 424; 2000 WL 194832
84 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2000) State of CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, v. SUTTER HEALTH SYSTEM, Alta Bates Medical Center, and Summit Medical Center, Defendants. No. C99-03803 MMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. January 5, 2000. *1058 *1059 John G. Donhoff, Jr., Attorney General, Thomas Gree