Cases

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(m)(l)(B) (2008).

41 So.3d 958 (2010) Domenic L. MASSARI, III, Appellant, v. Thomas K. BOURKE, Appellee. No. 3D09-2251. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 21, 2010. Rehearing Denied August 30, 2010. Cohen, Foster and Romine and Todd Foster, Tampa, for appellant. Goldstein, Tanen and Trench and Richard M. Goldstein, Miami, for appellee.</

White, J. This case comes to us as an appeal by the State pursuant to *122Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2315.01 (Reissue 1989) of an order entered by the district court for York County, Nebraska, which sustained in part the defendant’s motion to quash the information charging him with terroristic threats. The court’s order declared that part of the state terroristic threats st

318 S.W.2d 310 (1958) Joseph COHEN, Margaret Cohen, Louis Cohen, Bella Cohen, Harry Sircus, Ann Sircus, Leo Pollock, Adele Pollock, E. R. Klein, Fay Klein, and Josephine M. Goldberg and Commerce Trust Company, Co-Trustees of Charles E. Milens Trust, Appellants, v. Hugh R. ENNIS, Thomas C. Bourke, David W. Childs, Clair H. Schroeder, and Luther Willis, members of and constituting the Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, Missouri, Kansas City

308 S.W.2d 669 (1958) Joseph COHEN, Margaret Cohen, Louis Cohen, Bella Cohen, Harry Sircus, Ann Sircus, Leo Pollock, Adele Pollock, E. R. Klein, Fay Klein, and Josephine M. Goldberg, and Commerce Trust Company, Cotrustees of Charles E. Milens Trust, Appellants, v. Hugh R. ENNIS, Thomas C. Bourke, David W. Childs, Clair H. Schroeder, and Luther Willis, members of and constituting the Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, Missouri, Kansas City

SPERRY, Commissioner. This is an appeal by neighboring property owners from a judgment affirming a decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, whereby the Board granted the application of Continental Baking Company to use two vacant lots owned by it, for a truck turnaround and driveway into its bakery building. This appeal was, originally, to the Supreme Court, on the theory that a constitu

124 Cal.App.2d 225 (1954) CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, v. SAMUEL COHEN, Appellant. Civ. No. 19707. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. Mar. 29, 1954. Samuel Cohen, in pro per., for Appellant. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, and James A. Doherty, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

SULLIVAN, J. This is an appeal from an order of the probate court confirming a referee’s report recommending that decedent's will dated November 27, 1942, be admitted to probate and that decedent’s later will dated January 27, 1961, be refused admission to probate as a lost or destroyed will. The above order was made January 4, 1963. On the same day the court made a second order admitting the will to probate and appointing execu

Cox, J. This is a bill in equity for an accounting by the defendants, including Isaac Simon and his wife, Rose, of transactions in relation to certain real estate alleged to have been purchased in such circumstances that although the title was taken in the name of the defendant Isaac Simon, hereinafter referred to as Simon, nevertheless he held as trustee for the plaintiff’s mother, who died prior to the bringing of the bill lea

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge. This appeal concerns a controversy between Clyde Bourke, trustee in bankruptcy of Roger Craig, Inc., and Benjamin Krick over the proceeds from the sale *502 of certain real property located in Montgomery County, Maryland. Determination of the issue is wholly dependent on Maryl

CRICHTON, J., dissents in part. hi dissent from the majority opinion solely as to the remedy imposed. The majority reverses the decision of the trial court based upon the trial judge’s articulation of race-neutral reasons under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Before hastily employing the drastic remedy of reversing *40

CLARK, Justice. * | TThis is a direct appeal under La. Const, art. V, § 5(D) by the defendant Lamondre-Tucker. 1 In November 2008, a Caddo Parish grand jury indicted the defendant for the first degree murder of Tavia Sills, in violation of La. R.S. 14:30.' After a

Memorandum Opinion ANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Presently before the Court are Defendant’s two motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (D.1.17, 20). The issues have been fully briefed. (D.I. 18, 21, 28, 25, 27, 28). The Court held oral argument on April 22, 2016. (D.I. 30). For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion as to patentable subject matter and dismiss as m

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. The Constitution promises libertyto all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity. The petitioners in these cases seek to find that liberty by marrying someone of the same sex and having their marriages deemed lawful on the same te

SUTTON, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COOK, J., joined. DAUGHTREY, J. (pp. 421-37), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. This is a case about change — and how best to handle it under the United States Constitution. From the vantage point of 2014, it would now seem, the question is not whether American law will allow gay couples to marr

RADER, Circuit Judge. Bayer brought two separate actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia asserting that Elan Pharmaceuticals Research Corp. (Elan) infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,264,446 (the '446 patent). The first action asserted that Elan infringed by filing an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) with the Food and Drug Administration (

153 F.Supp.2d 101 (2001) CONNECTICUT PIPE TRADES HEALTH FUND, et al., v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC., et al. No. 397CV1305(JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 21, 2001. *102 Melvyn I. Weiss, Michael C. Spencer, Beth A. Kaswan, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach, New York City, Robert M. Cheverie, Cheverie &

ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Amy Sandler and Nikole (“Niki”) Quasney, ask this court to grant a temporary restraining order requiring the state of Indiana to recognize their out-of-state marriage. The court held a hearing on April 10, 2014, and issued a bench ruling GRANTING the temporary restraining order, which expires 28 day

816 F.Supp.2d 798 (2011) Frederick SCHIFF, Plaintiff, v. The CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendant. No. C 08-4627 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 8, 2011. *803 Thomas Kevin Bourke, Law Office of Thomas K. Bourke, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff. Lauren Marie Monson, San Francisco

Maletz, Judge: In this case the court is called upon to determine the proper tariff classification of certain cotton canvas shoe uppers that were exported from Japan in 1972 and entered at the port of New York during the same year. Upon entry, the merchandise, described on the invoices as “Canvas Shoe Uppers,” was classified by the government under item 380.00 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as “* * *