Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cobb v. Albany International”
Auburn Medical Center, Inc. v. Cobbpublic domain
(2008) AUBURN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. Sue Bell COBB, in her official capacity as Chief Justice, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:03cv1225-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 21, 2008. OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. This case is a recent chapter in a long-standing dispute betw
Optigen, LLC v. International Genetics, Inc.public domain
777 F.Supp.2d 390 (2011) OPTIGEN, LLC, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL GENETICS, INC., Genetic Fulfillment USA, LLC, Pinpoint DNA Tech., Inc., and Richard B. Dobbins, Defendants, International Genetics, Inc., Genetic Fulfillment USA, LLC, Pinpoint DNA Tech., Inc., and Richard B. Dobbins, Counter-Claimants, v. Optigen, LLC, Counter-Defendant, Optigen, LLC, Plaintiff, v. International Genetics, Inc., Genetic Fulfillment USA, LLC
Johnson v. City of Albany, Ga.public domain
413 F.Supp. 782 (1976) Johnnie JOHNSON, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF ALBANY, GEORGIA, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 1200. United States District Court, M. D. Georgia, Albany Division. May 6, 1976. *783 *784 C. B. King, King & Phipps, Herbert E. Phipps,
Whiton v. Albany City Insurancepublic domain
Gray, J. The clause in each of these policies, by which the vessel insured was “ prohibited from all guano islands,” except the Peruvian or Chinchas, was a warranty, any breach of which defeated the policy, without regard to the question whether it did or did not increase the risk. Odiorne v. New England Insurance Co. 101 Mass. 551. Cobb v. Lime Rock Insurance Co. 58 Maine 326. The issue submit
Wright v. Goordpublic domain
554 F.3d 255 (2009) Melvin M. WRIGHT, Jr., as Administrator of the Affairs of Melvin O. Wright, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, Commissioner; A. Dire, Corrections Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility; M. Dermutt, Corrections Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility; M. Kasunic, Corrections Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility; Gary H. Filion, Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility; Tiberis, Corrections Officer
People v. Harrisonpublic domain
People v Harrison (2021 NY Slip Op 07445) People v Harrison 2021 NY Slip Op 07445 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Sangi v. Sangipublic domain
Sangi v Sangi (2021 NY Slip Op 04270) Sangi v Sangi 2021 NY Slip Op 04270 Decided on July 8, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Matter of Baxton v. Annuccipublic domain
*1236 Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. After petitioner’s urine twice tested positive for marihuana, he was charged
Matter of Payne v. Stanfordpublic domain
Matter of Payne v Stanford (2019 NY Slip Op 05242) Matter of Payne v Stanford 2019 NY Slip Op 05242 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Matter of Espinal v. New York State Bd. of Parolepublic domain
Matter of Espinal v New York State Bd. of Parole (2019 NY Slip Op 04080) Matter of Espinal v New York State Bd. of Parole 2019 NY Slip Op 04080 Decided on May 23, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by N
Nevius v. Palomarespublic domain
193 Argued and submitted January 15, reversed and remanded September 1, 2021 John NEVIUS and Mary Von, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Efrain PALOMARES and Robyn Palomares, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents. W
Sloth v. Constellation Brands, Inc.public domain
DECISION and ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Vicky Sloth (“Sloth”), brings this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, (“ADEA”) (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.); 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the New York State Human Right
Matter of Elizabeth St. Garden, Inc. v City of New York (2023 NY Slip Op 03434) Matter of Elizabeth St. Garden, Inc. v City of New York 2023 NY Slip Op 03434 Decided on June 27, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New Y
Matter of Elizabeth St. Garden, Inc. v City of New York (2023 NY Slip Op 03434) Matter of Elizabeth St. Garden, Inc. v City of New York 2023 NY Slip Op 03434 Decided on June 27, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New Y
Matter of JHK Dev., LLC v. Town of Salinapublic domain
Matter of JHK Dev., LLC v Town of Salina (2024 NY Slip Op 06467) Matter of JHK Dev., LLC v Town of Salina 2024 NY Slip Op 06467 Decided on December 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur
Jackson v. McCurrypublic domain
CLAY D. LAND, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE *1371This case began when two administrators at Chattahoochee County Middle High School ("CCMHS") searched a student's cell phone without a warrant during their investigation of alleged threats made against the student. The matter escalated when the student's father, who was upset by the search o
Hodgen v. Forest Oil Corp.public domain
862 F.Supp. 1560 (1994) Jerry B. HODGEN and Bobbie Sue Hodgen v. FOREST OIL CORPORATION, Ronald J. Doucet, A & A Boats, Inc., and C & G Marine Service, Inc. Civ. A. No. 93-0322. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette-Opelousas Division. May 27, 1994. *1561 Jerry G. Jones, Jones & Alexander, Cameron, L
Cea v. O'Brienpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Margaret Cea appeals the district court’s denial of her motion for a new trial. All other grounds for appeal — such as the purported need for a warrant preceding the strip search and challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence concerning reasonable suspicion, the denial of Cea’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, and the denial of Cea’s motion for an amended judgment — have been insuff
Hodgen v. Forest Oil Corp.public domain
862 F.Supp. 1567 (1994) Jerry B. HODGEN and Bobbie Sue Hodgen v. FOREST OIL CORPORATION, Ronald J. Doucet, A & A Boats, Inc. and C & G Marine Service, Inc., et al. Civ. A. No. 93-0322. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette-Opelousas Division. September 15, 1994. *1568 *1569<
Hodgen v. Forest Oil Corp.public domain
862 F.Supp. 1552 (1994) Jerry B. HODGEN and Bobbie Sue Hodgen v. FOREST OIL CORPORATION, Ronald J. Doucet, A & A Boats, Inc. and C & G Marine Service, Inc. Civ. A. No. 93-0322. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette-Opelousas Division. April 26, 1994. *1553 *1554 Jerry