Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS; No. 23-15087 TORO CASTANO; SARAH CRONK; JOSHUA DONOHOE; MOLIQUE D.C. No. 4:22-cv- FRANK; DAVID MARTINEZ; 05502-DMR TERESA SANDOVAL; NATHANIEL VAUGHN, ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; SAN FRANC

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS; No. 23-15087 TORO CASTANO; SARAH CRONK; JOSHUA DONOHOE; MOLIQUE D.C. No. FRANK; DAVID MARTINEZ; 4:22-cv-05502- TERESA SANDOVAL; DMR NATHANIEL VAUGHN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCI

Filed 7/21/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS, Plaintiff and Appellant, A164180 v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN (San Francisco County FRANCISCO, et al., Super. Ct. No. CPF-18-516456)

RUSHING, P.J. PREMO, J.

12 Cal.Rptr.3d 798 (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 233 Linda PETTYE et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. A103129. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four. April 30, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 25, 2004. Review Denied July 21, 2004.</

Filed 8/11/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE SAN DIEGO et al., D080199 Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 37-2021- 00024590-CU-MC-CTL and 37- CITY OF SAN DIEGO et al., 2021-

Opinion RUVOLO, P. J. I. INTRODUCTION In this petition for writ of mandate, appellant Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island (CSTI) contends that respondents City and County of San Francisco (City) 1 and respondent and real party in interest Trea

Filed 12/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE JOBS & HOUSING COALITION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, A158977 v. (Alameda County CITY OF OAKLAND, Super. Ct. No. RG19005204) Defendant and Appellant. A gro

BROWN, J., Dissenting. Americans are a diverse group of hard-working, confident, and creative people molded into a nation not by common ethnic identity, cultural legacy, or history; rather, Americans have been united by a dream—a dream of freedom, a vision of how free people might live. The dream has a history. The idea that property ownership is the essential prerequisite of liberty has long been “a fundamental tenet of Anglo-Am

Filed 6/30/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff and Respondent, A158645 v. (City & County of San Francisco ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN Super. Ct. No. CGC-19-573230) THE MATTER OF PROPOSIT

18 F.3d 1482 GOLDEN GATE HOTEL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and Brad Paul,Defendants-Appellants.GOLDEN GATE HOTEL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and Brad Paul, Defendants,andTenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.GOLDEN GATE HOTEL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and Brad Paul, Defenda

Filed 5/24/17; pub order 6/20/17 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SJJC AVIATION SERVICES, LLC, H041035 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 1-13-CV-246405) v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Defendants and Respondents; SI

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge: Appellants appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment on their challenge to the Census Bureau’s count of homeless persons during the 1990 census. Appellants lack standing, and therefore we affirm. I. The Census Bureau

ALDISERT, Senior Circuit Judge: The City and County of San Francisco, the Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. and the North of Market Planning Coalition (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s declaration that the City’s residential hotel conversion ordinance violates the Fifth Amendment’s proscription against taking private property without just compensation. After granting partial summary judgment in favor of

Filed 1/22/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IMHOTEP MUSTAQEEM, D085750 Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 24CU007380C) v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Carolyn M. Caietti, Judge. Reversed and r

864 F.Supp. 917 (1993) GOLDEN GATE HOTEL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., North of Market Planning Coalition, and Brad Paul, Defendants. No. C-91-3386-JPV. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 21, 1993. *918 *919 Viole

Filed 4/2/19; On transfer CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION et al., C079835 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 847 OPINION County of San Diego (County) paid benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program to Catherine Lamb's minor daughter, Sarah, after Sarah left Catherine's home and had a baby.1 Catherine appeals from a judgme

Filed 10/3/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE SAN DIEGO et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, D084969 v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 37-2021- CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS ACTION 00024590-CU-MC-CTL & NETWORK et al.,

OPINION PER CURIAM. These consolidated election law appeals present constitutional challenges to Ohio’s strict application of its disqualification rules for nonconforming provisional ballots to those caused by poll-worker error, as well as issues involving the validity of a federal court’s consent decree that abrogates state law without finding violations o