Cases

J^PETTIGREW, J. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the trial court granting a motion for partial summary judgment in favor of defendant, dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for punitive and exemplary damages. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS On August 28, 1993, Betsy Pike was a guest passenger in a vehicle driven by Clifton Dunaway. Judy Dunaway was also a passenger in the Dun

[Cite as Clifton v. Johnson, 2016-Ohio-8120.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY RONALD L. CLIFTON, et al., : : Case No. 15CA30 Plaintiffs-Appellees, : : vs. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT : ENTRY PEARL K. JOHNSON, et al., :

SILVER, J. [¶ 1] Jeffrey P. Buhrman, the sole trustee of the Clifton M. Pike Family Trust, a testamentary trust established under Clifton’s will, appeals the decision of the Cumberland County Probate Court (Mazziotti, J.) granting the petition of the two adult children of Clifton and Doris M. Pike to combine the assets of Doris’s estate into Clifton’s trust, terminate both parents’ trusts, and direct that the assets

OPINION BROWN, Judge. Ray Clifton appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Ruby McCammack. Clifton raises five issues, which we consolidate and restate as whether the court erred in granting summary judgment. We reverse and remand. 1 F

Supreme Court No. 2025-21-Appeal. (PC 24-249) Clifton Peasley : v. : City of Providence, by and through : its Treasurer, Shomari Husband. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are reque

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED State of West Virginia, Plaintiff Below, Respondent October 11, 2019 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01645-COA ESTATE OF SHERMAN WARD AND LINDY APPELLANT SPEIGHTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE OTHER WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF SHERMAN WARD v. CLIFTON WILLIAMS, M.D. APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/30/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MICHAEL M. TA

Opinion of the Court CRAWFORD, Judge: In February and March 1990, appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Fort Carson, Colorado. Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of rape and burglary, in violation of Articles 120 and 129, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920 and 929,. respectively. Appellant was sentenced to a bad-conduct d

954 S.W.2d 250 (1997) 330 Ark. 354 Barbara J. BEATTY, Individually and as Natural Guardian of Kristi BEATTY, and Kristi Beatty, Appellants, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Appellee. No. 97-349. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 31, 1997. *251 George E. Pike, Jr., Deborah Pike Bliss, Clifton H. Hoofman, No

975 S.W.2d 860 (1998) 63 Ark.App. 155 Jim GIBSON, Appellant, v. Jim HERRING, d/b/a The Gem Shop, Appellee. No. CA 98-181. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I. October 7, 1998. *861 Margaret M. Newton, Mel Sayes, Little Rock, for Appellant. George E. Pike, Jr., Deborah Pike Bliss, North Little R

851 S.W.2d 437 (1993) 312 Ark. 550 Barbara J. BOX, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. John T. BOX, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 92-928. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 19, 1993. *438 Hubert Alexander, Jacksonville, for appellant. Clifton H. Hoofman, No. Little Rock, George E. Pike, Little Rock, for appe

GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Chief Judge. This case involves an appeal from a District Judge’s grant of appellee Benchmaster’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. The judgment set aside a products liability award of $93,800 entered in favor of the plaintiff after a full jury trial. It is undisputed that plaintiff Estol Pike lost portions of four

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT RADCLIFFE; CHESTER No. 11-56376 CARTER ; MARIA FALCON ; CLIFTON C. SEALE, III; ARNOLD LOVELL, JR., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:05-cv-01070- DOC-MLG CHRISTY DRIVER ; IVONNE MARTINEZ; KELLY J. PORTER ; LISA BRISBANE; BRENDA MELENDEZ; RALPH MICHAEL PORTER , Objectors-Appellants,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT RADCLIFFE; CHESTER No. 11-56376 CARTER ; MARIA FALCON ; CLIFTON C. SEALE, III; ARNOLD LOVELL, JR., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:05-cv-01070- DOC-MLG CHRISTY DRIVER ; IVONNE MARTINEZ; KELLY J. PORTER ; LISA BRISBANE; BRENDA MELENDEZ; RALPH MICHAEL PORTER , Objectors-Appellants,

MAIN, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The parties agree that venue is proper in Bullock County where the plaintiffs filed suit. Additionally, Pike County, the neighboring county, is also a proper venue, and it has a strong connection to Ben F. Hicks and Imogene W. Hicks’s claims. Nevertheless, I do not agree that Bullock County’s connection to the claims is so weak that the “interest of justice

Richard Thompson, 610-436-5582, P.O. Box 463, West Chester, PA 19380 In the Twelfth Court of Appeals 1517 W. Front St., Suite 354 Tyler, Texas 75702 Tel 903 593 8471, Fax 903 593 8474-

[Cite as Ma v. Gomez, 2023-Ohio-524.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA SIMON MA, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111465 v. : ALBERTO GOMEZ, ET AL., : Defendants-Appellant

972 F.2d 1304 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2313, 122 Lab.Cas. P 35,693,1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 9 Robert A. MUNIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.Jay E. ALBRECHT; Bert D. Alton, III; Roy L. Ashlock, Sr.;Marc Bergman; Merwyn L. Bickler; Jorge A. Blackwood;Walter Blayney, Jr.; Ervin Byler; John B. Cassidy;Eufemio R. Castillo; H.J. Chellon; Bruce A. Curry; Ralp

HARLACHER SIBUM, J., This matter comes before us on defendants’ National General Assurance Company, GMAC Direct Insurance Company, and GMAC Insurance Company Online, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. On December 7, 2007, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants for injuries sustained following a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff was a passenger in the vehicle driven by defendant Santiago

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-23-00066-CV ________________ DAVID VANVELZER, Appellant V. AMERICAN BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO., d/b/a ABC SUPPLY CO., INC., Appellee ___________