Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Clifford P. HARRINGTON”
Harrington v. Richterpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
OPINION Hon. David T. Thuma, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss this § 510(b)1 subordination proceeding for lack of standing. The Court concludes that the Plaintiff did not have standing to bring the action in the first instance, and further concludes that the plan confirmed in this case gave the reorganized debtor the sole ri
State v. Cliffordpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Clifford, 2020-Ohio-5095.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. W. Scott Gwin, J. Hon. Craig R. B
Harrington v. City of Biddefordpublic domain
583 A.2d 695 (1990) Robert W. HARRINGTON et al. v. CITY OF BIDDEFORD et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs October 30, 1990. Decided December 6, 1990. Lloyd P. LaFountain, III, LaFountain & LaFountain, Biddeford, for plaintiff. Erland B. Hardy, Woodman & Edmands, Biddeford, for Diane Johnson. Michael Cantara, Caron & S
Laux v. Harringtonpublic domain
MEAD, J. [¶ 1] Robert J. Laux and Cynthia A. Moran-Laux (collectively Laux) appeal, and Ralph Harrington cross-appeals,1 from a judgment of the Superior Court (Oxford County, Clifford, J.) declaring the continued existence and location of a road easement in favor of Harrington over Laux’s property located in the Towns of Newry and Hanover, and awarding Harrington nominal damages for Laux
United States v. Harrington (Main)public domain
08-4088-cr United States v. Harrington (Main) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term 2008 (Argued: May 11, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009) Docket No. 08-4088-cr -----------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States v. Clifford (In Re Clifford)public domain
255 B.R. 258 (2000) In re Eugene E. CLIFFORD, Debtor. United States of America, Appellant, v. Eugene E. Clifford, Appellee. Nos. 99-CV-40214-NMG, 00-CV-40158-NMG, 00-CV-40159-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 21, 2000. *259 *260 Malcolm J. Barach, Barach & B
Klaus P. Schmueser and Ursula v. Schmueser, Cross-Appellees v. The Burkburnett Bank, Cross-Appellantpublic domain
SHAW, Chief District Judge: OPINION In 1985, Klaus P. Schmueser and Ursula V. Schmueser (“the Sehmuesers”) entered into a contract to sell their home to Clayton and Loretta Graef (“the Graefs”). Pursu *1028 ant to the contract, the Graefs executed a monthly installment n
People of Michigan v. Walter Edward Harringtonpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Huff v. FirstEnergy Corp.public domain
O’Donnell, J., concurring in judgment only. {¶ 23} The issue in this case is whether Ohio Edison and Asplundh Tree Expert Company intended to make Huff and other members of the public third-*203party beneficiaries of a contract that required Asplundh to conduct its work in a manner that adequately safeg
Clifford Corp., N v. v. Ingberpublic domain
713 F.Supp. 575 (1989) CLIFFORD CORPORATION, N.V., Plaintiff, v. Alfred INGBER, Defendant. No. 88 Civ. 3405 (JMW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 27, 1989. Philip LeB. Douglas, Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, New York City, for plaintiff. James J. Harrington, Haythe & Curley, New York City, for defendant. MEMOR
Hickory Neighborhood Defense League v. Skinnerpublic domain
ORDER ROBERT D. POTTER, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Petition for Fees and Litigation Costs, filed February 26, 1990. On March 12, 1990, the Defendants filed a Brief in Opposition. The Court briefly will summarize the litigation of this case. The Plaintiff, Hickory Neighborhood Defense League (HNDL), originally filed this action seeking to enjoin the p
Hickory Neighborhood Defense League v. Skinnerpublic domain
731 F.Supp. 207 (1990) HICKORY NEIGHBORHOOD DEFENSE LEAGUE, Plaintiff, v. Samuel K. SKINNER, Secretary of Transportation; Ray A. Barnhardt; James E. Harrington; and George E. Wells, Defendants. No. C-C-88-195-P. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. February 27, 1990. *208 Michael S. Scofield, Mar
Cary v. Town of Harringtonpublic domain
534 A.2d 355 (1987) Campbell CARY v. TOWN OF HARRINGTON.[1] Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued November 18, 1987. Decided December 9, 1987. *356 William B. Talbot, Sr. (orally), Talbot & Lovit, Machias, Bruce W. Smith, Drummond, Woodsum, Plimpton & MacMahon, Portland, for plaintiff. Earle S. Tyler,
Settling Devotional v. Copyright Royalty Boardpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. MILLETT, Circuit Judge: Cable operators’ retransmission of religious and devotional programming from 2000 to 2003 produced a pool of royalties that Congress charged the Copyright Royalty Judges with distributing to the copyright owners. The Appellant Settling Devotional Claimants (“Devotional Claim
Hickory Neighborhood Defense League v. Burnleypublic domain
703 F.Supp. 1208 (1988) HICKORY NEIGHBORHOOD DEFENSE LEAGUE, Plaintiff, v. James BURNLEY, Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation; Robert E. Farris, Administrator of Federal Highway Administration; James Harrington, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Transportation; George E. Wells, North Carolina State Highway Administrator, Defendants. No. C-C-88-195-P. United States District
Chapman & Drake v. Harringtonpublic domain
545 A.2d 645 (1988) CHAPMAN & DRAKE v. Granville HARRINGTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued May 5, 1988. Decided July 12, 1988. Jeffrey M. White, (orally), Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith & Lancaster, Portland, for plaintiff. *646 James M. Bowie, (orally), Hunt, Thompson & Bowie, Portland, for d
Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc.public domain
810 A.2d 929 (2002) 2002 ME 168 JENKINS, INC., v. WALSH BROTHERS, INC., et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs: July 22, 2002. Decided: November 22, 2002. *930 David P. Ray, Esq., Mary DeLano, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, P.A., Portland, ME, for plaintiff. Robert W. Har
Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc.public domain
776 A.2d 1229 (2001) 2001 ME 98 JENKINS, INC. v. WALSH BROTHERS, INC. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: January 10, 2001. Decided: June 29, 2001. *1231 David P. Ray, Esq., (orally), Mary Delano, Esq., Bernstein Shur Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, for plaintiff. Robert W. Harrington, Esq., (or
State v. Perrigopublic domain
640 A.2d 1074 (1994) STATE of Maine v. Jeffrey P. PERRIGO. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs March 2, 1994. Decided April 25, 1994. *1075 Geoffrey Rushlau, Dist. Atty., James E. Diehl, Leane Zainea, Asst. Dist. Attys., Belfast, for State. Samuel Nesbitt, Law Offices of John E. Harrington, Jr., Winterport