Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cleveland v. Evans”
Cleveland v. Evanspublic domain
[Cite as Cleveland v. Evans, 2014-Ohio-4567.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100721 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Cleveland Evans v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2022 Ark. 31 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-21-415 Opinion Delivered: February 17, 2022 CLEVELAND EVANS PETITIONER PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF V. MANDAMUS FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT FOR EXPEDITED STATE OF ARKA
Cleveland v. Eagletonpublic domain
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cleveland v. Eagleton, No. 4:14-cv-
State v. Evanspublic domain
MELODY J. STEWART, J.: {¶ 1} Federal agents in California attached a GPS tracking device to a package of marijuana that had been shipped to the Cleveland area. That package found its way into a vehicle driven by defendant-appellant Keisha Evans, leading to her conviction on a single count of drug possession. In this appeal, she complains: (1) that there was insufficient evidence to sho
City of Cleveland v. Martinpublic domain
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.: {¶ 1} The city of Cleveland appeals from the interlocutory judgment granting Calvin Martin's motion to suppress all evidence obtained during a traffic stop. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. {¶ 2} Martin was charged with violations of R.C. 4511.33, marked lane violations; R.C. 4510.11(A), driving under a suspended license; and R
Lancaster v. Evanspublic domain
DONALDSON, Judge. Harold Lancaster and Candy Lancaster appeal from a summary judgment of the Tallapoosa Circuit Court (“the trial court”) denying their claim- seeking an injunction against Walter S. Evans and Traci E. Evans. The Lancasters alleged that the Ev-anses had violated restrictive covenants applicable to certain property by building a boathouse (“the boathouse”)1 and by planting trees and
Darnell Cleveland v. State of Indianapublic domain
Baker, Judge. [1] Darnell Cleveland appeals his convictions for Class A Misdemeanor Carrying a Handgun Without a License 1 and Class A Misdemeanor Possession of Marijuana, 2 arguing that (1) the trial court should have excluded all evidence obtained from his search and
Cleveland v. Groceryworks.com, LLCpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION This case is before the Court on a motion for partial summary judgment by Defendant Groceryworks.com, LLC d/b/a Safeway.com and Vons.com (“Grocery-works”) as to claims by Plaintiff Darren Cleveland that Groceryworks violated the California L
Blackmon v. Evans (In Re Evans)public domain
410 B.R. 317 (2009) In re Cleveland EVANS, Jr., Debtor. Aletha W. Blackmon, Plaintiff, v. Cleveland Evans, Jr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 6:08-bk-03099-KSJ. Adversary No. 6:08-ap-137. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. May 28, 2009. *318 Julius L. Williams, Winter Park, FL, for Plaintiff. A
Evans v. Statepublic domain
PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice. | TAppellant Cleveland Evans appeals from his conviction for capital murder and his sentence to life imprisonment without parole. His sole point on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We affirm Evans’s conviction and sentence. On the evening of October 8, 2008, police responded to a call from
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondents, Nancy Anne Zoller, of Lyndhurst, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0037933, and Edward James Mamone, of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney *126 Registration No. 0039310, were both admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1987. Both were associates in the Cleveland law firm of G
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondents, Nancy Anne Zoller, Attorney Registration No. 0037933, of Lyndhurst, Ohio, and Edward James Mamone, Attorney Registration No. 0039310, of Cleveland, Ohio, were both admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1987. Both were associates in the Cleveland law firm of Gurney, Miller & Mamone (“GM&M”)
Imaginary Images, Inc. v. Evanspublic domain
612 F.3d 736 (2010) IMAGINARY IMAGES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Paper Moon; BTF3, L.L.C., d/b/a Paper Moon; Papermoon-Springfield, Incorporated, d/b/a Paper Moon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Pamela O'Berry EVANS, in her official capacity as Chair of the Virginia Alcohol Beverage Control Board; Susan R. Swecker, in her official capacity as Member of the Virginia Alcohol Control Board; Esther H. Vassar, in her official capacity as Member of the Virginia Al
Evans-Hoke v. Paulsonpublic domain
503 F.Supp.2d 83 (2007) Elinore EVANS-HOKE, Plaintiff, v. Henry M. PAULSON, Jr.,[1] et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-556 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 31, 2007. *84 Elinore Evans-Hoke, Shaker Heights, OH, pro se. Beatriz T. Saiz, U.S. Department of Justice, Carmen M. Guerr
IMAGINARY IMAGES INC. v. Evanspublic domain
(2008) IMAGINARY IMAGES INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pamela O'Berry EVANS, et al., Defendants. Action No. 3:08-CV-398. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. December 19, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES R. SPENCER, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dock
Cleveland v. Viacom Inc.public domain
SMITH, Circuit Judge.* Plaintiffs, independent video retailers, sued Blockbuster Inc. (“Blockbuster”), its parent company Viacom Inc. (“Viacom”), and the home-video affiliates of the seven major Hollywood movie studios,2 alleging price discrimination and antitrust violations. The claims turn largely on the studios’ output revenue-sharing agreements with Blockbuster, whe
Evans v. Midland Funding LLCpublic domain
(2008) Madlyn EVANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:08-CV-180. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 28, 2008. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SEVERANCE AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge. This matter is b
Evans v. Walter Industries, Inc.public domain
(2008) Isaiah EVANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WALTER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV-05-BE-1017-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. September 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE, District Judge. This case comes before the court on the following motions: "Defendant U.S. Pipe and Foundry Compan
Pakeer v. Clevelandpublic domain
[Cite as Pakeer v. Cleveland, 2023-Ohio-4213.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA KIRANMAI PAKEER, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 112489 v. : CITY OF CLEVELAND, ET AL., :
Evans v. Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc.public domain
735 F.Supp.2d 785 (2010) Jeffrey EVANS, Plaintiff, v. HANGER PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 09-cv-1344. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 18, 2010. *787 Matthew P. Mullen, Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty, Canton, OH, John P. Maxwell, Krugliak, Wilkins,