Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cleveland Anderson”
Cleveland v. Andersonpublic domain
[Cite as Cleveland v. Anderson, 2013-Ohio-4710.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99688 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Cleveland v. Andersonpublic domain
[Cite as Cleveland v. Anderson, 2013-Ohio-165.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97787 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Cleveland v. Andersonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Larry Charles Cleveland appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003), and we vacate and remand in light
Anderson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.public domain
[Cite as Anderson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 2018-Ohio-4596.] JASON A. ANDERSON Case No. 2018-00593PQ Requester Judge Patrick M. McGrath v. JUDGMENT ENTRY GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Respondent {¶1} On January 18, January 23, and March 29 of 2018, requester Jason Anderson and representatives acting on hi
Anderson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.public domain
[Cite as Anderson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 2018-Ohio-3653.] JASON A. ANDERSON Case No. 2018-00593PQ Requester Special Master Jeffery W. Clark v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Respondent {¶1} Ohio’s Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, provides a remedy for production of records under R.
United States v. Clevelandpublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss *1219Counts 1 and 5 of the Indictment, filed September 24, 2018 (Doc. 72)("Motion"). The primary issues are whether: (i) a Navajo Nation Department of Public Safety ("NDPS") officer, Houston Largo, was a fe
Anderson v. Laureanopublic domain
McFadden, Presiding Judge. Jameila Anderson appeals the award of OCGA § 9-11-68 costs and attorney fees to Kathleen Laureano. Because the $801.99 award does not meet the statutory threshold of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) for filing a direct appeal in an action for damages, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. So we must dismiss. Anderson filed a complaint for d
Anderson v. Jack Cleveland Casino, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Anderson v. Jack Cleveland Casino, L.L.C., 2026-Ohio-837.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA WILFRED ANDERSON, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 115393
Anderson v. City of Cleveland, Tenn.public domain
90 F.Supp.2d 906 (2000) Johnny L. ANDERSON, Abe Hayes, Jr., Wendell Maupin and Timothy L. Winder, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE, Defendant. No. 1:99-CV-56. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. February 24, 2000. Bob E Lype, James R McKoon, Douglas N Blackwell, II, McKoon, Billings, Gold & Presley, P.C., Chattanooga, TN,
Cleveland v. Abernathypublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Cleveland appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and a subsequent order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the
Cleveland v. Abernathypublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Cleveland appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and a subsequent order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the
Cleveland v. Seneca SCpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Cleveland appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on Cleveland’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and a subsequent order denying Cleveland’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
ANDERSON v. LEWIS Et Al.public domain
Andrews, Judge. The appellant, Teena Anderson, commenced this action to recover for injuries sustained when her automobile collided with a vehicle owned by Clarence Lewis and driven by his grandson, Dana Brown. The trial court dismissed Brown as a party because of lack of service and subsequently granted summary judgment for Lewis on the grounds that Brown's dismissal was fatal to the d
City of Cleveland v. Andersonpublic domain
On July 17, 1990, the defendants-appellants, twenty-six abortion protestors, pled no contest to a single charge of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor under Cleveland Municipal Ordinance 605.03. Appellants were sentenced by the trial court to the maximum allowable fine of $100 plus costs, with costs suspended. After hearing the sentence of the court, the appellants informed the court that although they had the ability to pay the fine they would not pay the fine because of religious
Mitchell v. Anderson (In re Mitchell)public domain
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION1 ARTHUR I. HARRIS, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This adversary proceeding involves a pro se debtor, whose Ohio law license has been suspended, and a pro se' creditor, whose Ohio medical license has been revoked. Luann Mitchell, the pro se debtor, seeks damages against Wilfred Anderson, the pro se creditor, for prosecuting m
Danny Hill v. Carl Andersonpublic domain
OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. In this death penalty case out of Ohio, Danny Hill asserts in his habeas petition that he may not be executed because he is “intellectually disabled,” as now defined in three Supreme Court cases decided in the past fifteen years.
Arthur Tyler v. Carl Andersonpublic domain
OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Arthur Tyler, an Ohio inmate sentenced to death for the 1983 murder of Sander Leach, filed in the district court in 2013 an amended motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). The judgment from which Tyler sought relief was entered in 2002. In his amended motion, Tyler req
Carter v. Andersonpublic domain
585 F.3d 1007 (2009) Clarence CARTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-3372. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: August 5, 2009. Decided and Filed: October 30, 2009. *1009 ARGUED: Joseph E. Wilhelm, Federal Public Defender's Office, Cleveland, Ohio, fo
People v. Clevelandpublic domain
11 Cal.Rptr.3d 236 (2004) 86 P.3d 302 32 Cal.4th 704 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Dellano Leroy CLEVELAND and Chauncey Jamal Veasley, Defendants and Appellants. No. S024416 Supreme Court of California March 25, 2004 Rehearing Denied June 9, 2004 Certiorari Denied January 10, 2005
Cleveland v. Commonwealthpublic domain
562 S.E.2d 696 (2002) 38 Va. App. 199 Kenneth Charles CLEVELAND v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 0379-01-3. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Salem. April 30, 2002. Grady W. Donaldson, Jr. (Schenkel & Donaldson, P.C., on brief), Lynchburg, for appellant. Robert H. Anderson, III, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Randolph A. Bea