⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Cleveland Anderson”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-10-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2013 Ohio 4710
[Cite as Cleveland v. Anderson, 2013-Ohio-4710.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99688 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-01-24 · Published · cited 3× · 2013 Ohio 165
[Cite as Cleveland v. Anderson, 2013-Ohio-165.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97787 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 223 F. App'x 652
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Larry Charles Cleveland appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003), and we vacate and remand in light
Ohio Court of Claims · 2018-10-19 · Published · cited 11× · 2018 Ohio 4596
[Cite as Anderson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 2018-Ohio-4596.] JASON A. ANDERSON Case No. 2018-00593PQ Requester Judge Patrick M. McGrath v. JUDGMENT ENTRY GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Respondent {¶1} On January 18, January 23, and March 29 of 2018, requester Jason Anderson and representatives acting on hi
Ohio Court of Claims · 2018-08-21 · Published · cited 9× · 2018 Ohio 3653
[Cite as Anderson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., 2018-Ohio-3653.] JASON A. ANDERSON Case No. 2018-00593PQ Requester Special Master Jeffery W. Clark v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Respondent {¶1} Ohio’s Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, provides a remedy for production of records under R.
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 356 F. Supp. 3d 1215
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss *1219Counts 1 and 5 of the Indictment, filed September 24, 2018 (Doc. 72)("Motion"). The primary issues are whether: (i) a Navajo Nation Department of Public Safety ("NDPS") officer, Houston Largo, was a fe
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017-09-27 · Published · cited 9× · 342 Ga. App. 888; 805 S.E.2d 636; 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 430
McFadden, Presiding Judge. Jameila Anderson appeals the award of OCGA § 9-11-68 costs and attorney fees to Kathleen Laureano. Because the $801.99 award does not meet the statutory threshold of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) for filing a direct appeal in an action for damages, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. So we must dismiss. Anderson filed a complaint for d
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ohio 837
[Cite as Anderson v. Jack Cleveland Casino, L.L.C., 2026-Ohio-837.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA WILFRED ANDERSON, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 115393
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2000-02-24 · Published · cited 10× · 90 F. Supp. 2d 906; 90 F. Supp. 906; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4705; 2000 WL 374503
90 F.Supp.2d 906 (2000) Johnny L. ANDERSON, Abe Hayes, Jr., Wendell Maupin and Timothy L. Winder, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE, Defendant. No. 1:99-CV-56. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. February 24, 2000. Bob E Lype, James R McKoon, Douglas N Blackwell, II, McKoon, Billings, Gold & Presley, P.C., Chattanooga, TN,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-08-04 · Published · cited 0× · 330 F. App'x 39
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Cleveland appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and a subsequent order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-08-04 · Published · cited 0× · 330 F. App'x 39
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Cleveland appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and a subsequent order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-01-03 · Published · cited 1× · 410 F. App'x 578
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Cleveland appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on Cleveland’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and a subsequent order denying Cleveland’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 809 S.E.2d 260
Andrews, Judge. The appellant, Teena Anderson, commenced this action to recover for injuries sustained when her automobile collided with a vehicle owned by Clarence Lewis and driven by his grandson, Dana Brown. The trial court dismissed Brown as a party because of lack of service and subsequently granted summary judgment for Lewis on the grounds that Brown's dismissal was fatal to the d
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992-08-03 · Published · cited 7× · 611 N.E.2d 439; 82 Ohio App. 3d 63; 1992 Ohio App. LEXIS 3814
On July 17, 1990, the defendants-appellants, twenty-six abortion protestors, pled no contest to a single charge of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor under Cleveland Municipal Ordinance 605.03. Appellants were sentenced by the trial court to the maximum allowable fine of $100 plus costs, with costs suspended. After hearing the sentence of the court, the appellants informed the court that although they had the ability to pay the fine they would not pay the fine because of religious
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016-01-28 · Published · cited 2× · 545 B.R. 209
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION1 ARTHUR I. HARRIS, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This adversary proceeding involves a pro se debtor, whose Ohio law license has been suspended, and a pro se' creditor, whose Ohio medical license has been revoked. Luann Mitchell, the pro se debtor, seeks damages against Wilfred Anderson, the pro se creditor, for prosecuting m
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-02-02 · Published · cited 2× · 881 F.3d 483
OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. In this death penalty case out of Ohio, Danny Hill asserts in his habeas petition that he may not be executed because he is “intellectually disabled,” as now defined in three Supreme Court cases decided in the past fifteen years.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014-04-15 · Published · cited 122× · 749 F.3d 499; 2014 WL 1465040; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6952
OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Arthur Tyler, an Ohio inmate sentenced to death for the 1983 murder of Sander Leach, filed in the district court in 2013 an amended motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). The judgment from which Tyler sought relief was entered in 2002. In his amended motion, Tyler req
Carter v. Andersonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009-10-30 · Published · cited 62× · 585 F.3d 1007; 74 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1392; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23904; 2009 WL 3486383
585 F.3d 1007 (2009) Clarence CARTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-3372. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: August 5, 2009. Decided and Filed: October 30, 2009. *1009 ARGUED: Joseph E. Wilhelm, Federal Public Defender's Office, Cleveland, Ohio, fo
People v. Clevelandpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2004-03-25 · Published · cited 271× · 86 P.3d 302; 11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 236; 32 Cal. 4th 704; 4 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2531; 2004 Daily Journal DAR 3715; 2004 Cal. LEXIS 2547
11 Cal.Rptr.3d 236 (2004) 86 P.3d 302 32 Cal.4th 704 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Dellano Leroy CLEVELAND and Chauncey Jamal Veasley, Defendants and Appellants. No. S024416 Supreme Court of California March 25, 2004 Rehearing Denied June 9, 2004 Certiorari Denied January 10, 2005
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2002-04-30 · Published · cited 9× · 562 S.E.2d 696; 38 Va. App. 199; 2002 Va. App. LEXIS 249
562 S.E.2d 696 (2002) 38 Va. App. 199 Kenneth Charles CLEVELAND v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 0379-01-3. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Salem. April 30, 2002. Grady W. Donaldson, Jr. (Schenkel & Donaldson, P.C., on brief), Lynchburg, for appellant. Robert H. Anderson, III, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Randolph A. Bea