Cases

PER CURIAM: *255Background The Lynyrd Skynyrd band . Lynyrd Skynyrd was a rock band founded in the 1960s by Ronnie Van Zant ("Ronnie"), Gary R. Rossington, and Allen Collins. "The name Lynyrd Skynyrd was chosen as a spoof on the name of their high school gym teacher and is pronounced [as if it were spelled] Leonard S

301 B.R. 840 (2003) In re Cleopatra JONES, Debtor. No. 03-62325. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 12, 2003. *841 *842 John C. Lange, Gold, Lange & Majoros, PC, Southfield, MI, for Debtor. David Wm. Ruskin, Office of the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee,

391 F.Supp.2d 1064 (2005) Cleopatra JONES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and Sonic-Montgomery FLM, Inc., d/b/a Friendly Ford Lincoln Mercury, et al. Defendants. No. 204CV692FWO. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. April 22, 2005. *1065 C. Kn

Opinion NEEDHAM, J. Appellant L.M. was declared a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 6021 and was placed in a Southern California residential treatment program several hundred miles away from his home. The goal of his case plan was reunification with his father, and monthly visits were ordered as part of the plan. Appellant filed a motion to requi

HULL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants Cleopatra Jones and Delois Pritchett (“Plaintiffs”) brought this action against Defendant-Appellee Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc. (“Heard Chevrolet”), for alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1638(a)(2)(B)(iii), and TILA’s implementing regulation, Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.18(c)(l)(iii). Plaintiffs appeal

964 P.2d 484 (1998) 192 Ariz. 283 James BARNES and Rose Mary Martinez-Barnes, husband and wife; Naomi Martinez Outlaw, in her individual capacity; Isaac Martinez, in his individual capacity, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. James OUTLAW, Jr. and Cleopatra Outlaw, husband and wife; Andrew Outlaw, in his individual capacity; the Church of Jesus, an Arizona non-profit corporation, Defendants/Appellants. No. CV-9

REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Background Plaintiffs, Irene Stone O’Neal and Linda Hughes, brought this § 1983 action against the Mississippi State Board of Nursing, its executive director, and the board members in their official and individual capacities, for allegedly violating their Fourteenth Amendment Due Process rights when their license

577 S.W.2d 891 (1979) DON L. TULLIS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent, v. Vance K. GOVER et al., Appellants. No. 10555. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. January 18, 1979. As Modified on Motion February 9, 1979. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer Denied February 20, 1979. Application to Transfer Deni

177 Cal.App.4th 645 (2009) In re L.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. L.M., Defendant and Appellant; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, Objector and Respondent. No. A124299. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five. September 9, 2009. *647

MOSK, J. I dissent. Three significant questions are raised by the major issue in this case—the meaning and effect of the standard suicide exclusion clause in life insurance policies. They are: (1) whether the clause is ambiguous; (2) what the phrase “suicide, sane or insane” means; and (3) which party bears the burden of proving suicide. The majority correctly answer the first and third questions. Their answer t

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3374-14T3 IN THE MATTER OF TANAYA TUKES, TINA MUCHERSON, TYESHA CUFF, SARAH PATTERSON, JAYNET PETERSON, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION ERICA HENDERSON, NICOLE BUTLER, TAMARA PEYTON, TRACY BAILEY

The defendant, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereinafter "Pacific Mutual"), appeals from judgments, entered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiffs, Cleopatra Haslip, Cynthia Craig, Alma Calhoun, and Eddie Hargrove. All four plaintiffs are employees of Roosevelt City (hereinafter the "City"), a small incorporated community in western Jefferson County. As many small communities do, Roosevelt City allowed its employees to purchase a group health insurance policy t

17-2849-cv Ronnie Van Zant, Inc. v. Artimus Pyle UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2017 Argued: May 10, 2018 Decided: October 10, 2018

The plaintiff, Cleopatra Abston, appeals from a summary judgment entered against her in the Circuit Court of Mobile County. We affirm. Robert Rodgers purchased a 1979 automobile from Treadwell Ford, Inc., on June 30, 1979. Rodgers, as purchaser, and Abston, as co-maker, executed an installment sales contract and security agreement to Central Bank of the South (hereinafter "Central") and Central financed the purchase price of the automobile. The contract executed by Absto

Trump v Trump (2023 NY Slip Op 23180) [*1] Trump v Trump 2023 NY Slip Op 23180 Decided on June 9, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

MOYLAN, J. In mortgage foreclosure law, as elsewhere, society’s interest in finality and repose is a weighty one. As with statutes of limitations generally, procedural deadlines for raising certain challenges are established and strictly enforced. An unexcused failure to comply with a clear deadline may doom what might otherwise have

586 S.E.2d 639 (2003) SMITH v. The STATE. No. S03A0968. Supreme Court of Georgia. September 15, 2003. Reconsideration Denied October 17, 2003. *641 Steven H. Sadow, Atlanta, Bobby Lee Cook, Cook & Connelly, Summerville, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Bettieanne C. Hart, Elizabeth A. B

768 F.Supp. 405 (1991) HARRISON CONFERENCE SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. DOLCE CONFERENCE SERVICES, INC., Marenzana Group, Inc., Dolce Conference Services of Connecticut, Inc., and Dolce Company, Defendants. No. 90 C 4459. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 29, 1991. Solin & Breindel, P.C. (Howard Breindel, of counsel), New York City, for plaintif

People v White 2026 NY Slip Op 04475 July 16, 2026 Appellate Division, First Department Kapnick, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. The People of the state of New York, Appellant, v Frederick White, Defendant-Respondent. <

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Cesar A. Ramirez appeals from Judge McMahon’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his petition, Ramirez asserted four federal constitutional claims for relief: (i) ineffective assistance of trial counsel, (ii) erroneous evidentiary rulings amounting to a denial of confrontation rights and a fair trial, (iii) prosecutorial misconduct amounting to a denia