Cases

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 24, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Cle

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 651–728 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 651–728 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 3, 2012 Decided July 20, 2012 No. 10-1252 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION'S CLEAN AIR PROJECT, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, ET AL.,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 17); CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 23); AND STAYING CASE. LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case arises under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a). Plaintiffs, a coalition of environmental and labor interests, allege that Defendant VWR International, LLC, (“VWR”), a labor

Case: 24-60209 Document: 113-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-60209 FILED

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2023 Decided April 9, 2024 No. 22-1081 STATE OF OHIO, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS ADVANCED ENERGY UN

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 1, 2024 Decided June 20, 2025 No. 23-1177 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 23-1240, 23-1243, 23-1246, 2

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 25, 2020 Decided July 16, 2021 No. 19-1023 GROWTH ENERGY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENTS AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, ET AL., INTERVENOR

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 100–145 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 19, 2023 Decided July 18, 2023 No. 22-1015 WYNNEWOOD REFINING COMPANY, LLC AND COFFEYVILLE RESOURCES REFINING & MARKETING, LLC, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 22-1051, 22-1053 On Petitions for Review of

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 16, 2020 Decided May 19, 2020 No. 18-1285 STATE OF MARYLAND, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-1287, 18-1301

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 6, 2019 Decided October 25, 2019 No. 18-1114 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH ITS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA AND CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIR

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2020 Decided January 19, 2021 No. 19-1140 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENTS AEP GENERATING COMPANY, ET AL.,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 20, 2019 Decided September 6, 2019 No. 17-1258 AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT SMALL RETAILERS COALITION, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-1027, 18-1040, 1

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 11-1474 UPPER BLACKSTONE WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. No. 11-1610 CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC. Petitioner, v. UPPER

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 6, 2019 Decided October 25, 2019 Reissued November 14, 2019 No. 18-1114 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH ITS GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA AND CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Chief Judge: Several states and state regulatory agencies, together with corporations and industrial associations, petition for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s rule entitled “Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide,” and of the subsequent denial of petitions for reconsideration of the standard. Petitioners c

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 16, 2024 Decided July 26, 2024 Reissued August 14, 2024 No. 22-1073 SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY LLC AND SINCLAIR CASPER REFINING COMPANY LLC, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AMERICAN COALITION FOR ET