Cases

PER CURIAM. Robert Clayborne, Jr. appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal of his pro se complaint asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a claim of disability discrimination, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (

789 F.Supp.2d 873 (2011) CITY OF LANCASTER, Plaintiff, v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:10-CV-1041. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 6, 2011. *874 Bridget A. Purdue Riddell, Drew H. Campbell, Bricker & Eckler LLP, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Joseph R. Miller, Jonatha

306 F.Supp.2d 1160 (2003) Loretta McCLURE, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON COUNTY, ALABAMA, Houston County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Lamar Glover, individually and in his official capacity, and The Estate of Eric Sewell, Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-T-1223-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. December 30, 2003.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. Plaintiff James W. Bailey (“Bailey”) filed this lawsuit in response to allegedly unconstitutional deprivations of rights while Bailey was in custody in the Houston County Jail. Currently pending in this case are three motions to dismiss: Doc. # 32 — Motion to Dismiss by Andy Hughes, Commander Reed;

Opinion RICHMAN, Acting P. J. —Representing himself, appellant Donald T. Grappo filed a complaint purporting to allege 10 causes of action. Seven of the causes of action were set forth in one paragraph, the other three ranging from two paragraphs to five—a complaint, we note, that as framed could not have withstood a demurrer. Grappo had the complaint served on Kenneth McKean, a man named in the caption but no

2009 SD 2 L. S., Petitioner and Appellant, v. C. T., Respondent and Appellee. L. S., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. C. T., Defendant and Appellee. Nos. 24636, 24840 Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs on November 3, 2008 Opinion Filed January 14, 2009. RICHARD A. JOHNSON, GREGORY T. BREWERS of Strange, Farrell & Johnson,

682 S.E.2d 549 (2009) 278 Va. 286 Kelly BURDETTE v. BRUSH MOUNTAIN ESTATES, LLC. Record No. 082079. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 18, 2009. *550 Frank K. Friedman (Kendall O. Clay; Woods Rogers, on briefs), Roanoke, for appellant. Edwin C. Stone (Stone & Kellerman, on brief), Christiansbu

ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] Former wife commenced actions for a protection order and for modification of the visitation provisions of her divorce decree, alleging that her former husband was sexually abusing the parties’ child during visitations. The circuit court found that former wife failed to prove her allegations and denied relief. Because the circuit court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, we affirm.

112 F.Supp.2d 1260 (2000) Natalie SIMS, a minor, By and Through her parents and next friends Charles and Sheila SIMS, Plaintiff, v. Ashley FOREHAND, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 98-D-623-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. September 5, 2000. *1261 John L. McClung, Lindsey & McClung, Elba,

Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM. The five appellants challenge their convictions and sentences on various counts of *339 criminal activity involving drugs, guns and violence. For the reasons set out below, we affirm their convictions and their sentences

Appellee, Jim Ashlock, instituted this suit against appellant, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company of Texas, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him as the result of negligence of appellant, its agents, servants, and employes. The grounds of negligence alleged and submitted to the jury as the proximate cause of appellee's injuries, were: (1) The practice of mail clerks, in unloading mail at Whitewright, of throwing mail sacks from a moving trai

This opinion was filed January 10, but remittitur held up on petition for rehearing until March 8, 1907. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Circuit Judge, acting Associate Justice, in place of MR. JUSTICE JONES, disqualified. On the 11th day of May, 1905, the defendant, W. Gill Wylie, obtained from the plaintiffs, Thos. M. and John H. Fitzpatrick, a written option, whereby the plaintiffs, upon the consideration therein stated, agreed that said defendant should have the ex

Maxwell, J. In September, 1883, tbe defendant in error brought an action against the plaintiff in error to recover damages sustained by the death of one Clayborn Crockett. The peti*571tion, when filed, contained two counts, but on the motion of the defendant below the plaintiff was required to elept upon which count she would rely, and thereupon she selected the secon

559 F.2d 31 181 U.S.App.D.C. 254, 1 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1203 UNITED STATES of Americav.Harry R. HALDEMAN, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.John D. EHRLICHMAN, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.John N. MITCHELL, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Harry R. HALDEMAN and John D. Ehrlichman, Appellants.Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441.United States Court of Appe