Cases

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2025 VT 38

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

No. 126,127 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS REGINA M. ROGERS, as Administratrix of the ESTATE OF CRAIG ROGERS, SR., Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Kansas district courts are courts of gener

Filed 9/27/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GINA M. GRAY et al., H049324, H049433 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 1-14-CV263333) v.

546 F.3d 839 (2008) CLASSIC CHEESECAKE COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-3910. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 25, 2008. Decided October 17, 2008. Rehearing Denied November 4, 2008. *840 Steven

Page 244 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL February 8, 2022 430 FEBRUARY, 2022 341 Conn. 430 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lorson WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. ERIC LORSON ET AL. (SC 20194) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria,

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 09-SEP-2024 10:03 AM Dkt. 68 AMO

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Although I acknowledge that this is a close case, I cannot agree with my colleagues that Barbara Fawcett's complaint should be dismissed as a matter of law for failure to state a claim. Fawcett insists that, at a minimum, she is entitled to seek *141information about the rationales and factual basis for Citize

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 20-JUN-2024 10:39 AM Dkt. 42 OP

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1312 ___________________________ CitiMortgage, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellant v. Equity Bank, N.A. Defendant - Appellee ___________________________ No. 18-1313 ___________________________ CitiMortgage, Inc. Plaintiff - Cross A

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises out of a suit by defaulting borrowers who seek to assign fault to the manner in which a creditor foreclosed on its collateral, in this instance a multimillion dollar home located on Martha’s Vineyard. For the following reasons, we reject the borrowers’ fusillade of ehal-lenges to the creditor’s conduct, except that we find that the credi

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE GOODMAN’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOSE E. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Jonathan Goodman, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 13]. Magistrate Judge Goodman filed a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 37], recommending that the Motion be

*395 SMITH, Circuit Judge. Ninety-two plaintiffs 1 filed suit against PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC), alleging, among other things, (1) violations of Missouri’s Uniform Fiduciaries Law (UFL); (2) aiding and abetting the breach of fiduciary duties; (3) cons

Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION + T1 We are asked to determine whether filing an action to foreclose a judgment lien tolls the expiration of the underlying judgment. Appellant Bruce Gildea filed an action against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., seeking to foreclose his judgment lien against property owned by Wells Fargo.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge. In West Virginia, lender liability suits have taken a strange turn that threatens to uproot basic principles of contract law. The plaintiffs in these suits, homeowners tied to mortgages, have concocted a novel theory of injury. That theory is as follows: refinancing a home for more than its fair market value is one-sided and overly harsh against

ORDER ANNE C. CONWAY, United States District Judge This cause comes before the Court for consideration of the Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s (the “Bank”) Motion for Final Summary Judgment, filed on' June 30, 2015 (Doc. No. 85), and Plaintiff William M. Freeman’s (“Freeman”) Memorandum in Opposition, filed on July 30, 2015 (Doc. No: 95). Freeman filed this action based on di

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGG COSTA, District Judge. The real estate at issue in this proposed class action is part of an 800-acre development along the mid-Gulf Coast of Texas. But the allegations of fraud reach back to decisions made in Washington and Wall Street during the height of the financial crisis in the fall of 2008. In the spasm of bank merger activity that occurred during that period, whe

Opinion PERLUSS, P. J. —Marina Ivanoff appeals the order dismissing with prejudice her complaint against Bank of America, N.A., after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the bank’s demurrer to Ivanoff s complaint for violations of the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA) (15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.) and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) (Bu

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. #178] AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. #185] AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. #181] AS TO DEFENDANT’S FIRST COUNTERCLAIM VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge. This is an action filed against Connecticut Community