Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
3 opinions for “Clark v. Welspun Tubular LLC”
Pineda v. Manpower International, Inc.public domain
Robert J. Gladwin, Judge, dissenting. I concur with the majority that the Commission retains jurisdiction to determine the dual-employment issue and that Welspun Pipes, Inc., is a dual employer of appellant. However, I dissent from the holding that substantial evidence supports the Commission’s finding that Welspun Pipes, Inc., and Welspun Tubular, LLC, are a single entity. I
In re: Sanford Law Firm v.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2682 ___________________________ In re: Sanford Law Firm; Josh Sanford lllllllllllllllllllllAppellants ____________ Appeal from United States District Court
Stupp Corporation v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 20-1857 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 07/15/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ STUPP CORPORATION, A DIVISION OF STUPP BROS., INC., WELSPUN TUBULAR LLC USA, IPSCO TUBULARS, INC., MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee HYUNDAI STEEL COM