⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Clark v. Ryan”

Clark v. Ryanpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 1350; 197 L. Ed. 2d 535
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Clark v. Ryanpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 941; 126 S. Ct. 435
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014-12-30 · Published · cited 3× · 2014 WY 169; 340 P.3d 288; 2014 Wyo. LEXIS 192; 2014 WL 7403823
BURKE, Chief Justice. [T1] Appellants, Fern and Travis Clark, brought an action against the Ryan Park Property and Homeowners Association seeking an order, pursuant to the Wyoming Nonprofit Corporation Act, requiring the Association to allow the Clarks to inspect and copy certain corporate records. The district court entered the order, but denied the Clarks' request to recover cos
Clark v. Ryanpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987-05-15 · Published · cited 18× · 818 F.2d 1102; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6364
818 F.2d 1102 106 Lab.Cas. P 12,362 Hugh B. CLARK, Trustee; Jack L. Thomas, Trustee; RoanokeIron Workers Trust Fund; Roanoke Iron WorkersPension Fund; and Roanoke Iron WorkersApprentice Fund, Appellants,v.A.A. RYAN, Jr., Appellee. No. 85-2395. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued Dec. 11, 1986.Dec
Clark v. Ryanpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 818 F.2d 1102
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants Clark and Thomas, trustees of three trust funds established by Local 697, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, brought suit against A.A. Ryan to recover $22,534.29 in unpaid trust fund contributions on behalf of his non-union workers. The trial court held that Ryan was obliged to make payments for his union workers only. We believe that the distric
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-1788, 24-2168 & 24-2388 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEPHON DEMUS, RYAN CLARK, and MARLON BARKSDALE Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from t
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-10-19 · Published · cited 0× · 62 N.E.3d 460; 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 384; 2016 WL 6107867
PYLE, Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Following his participation in a horrific home invasion, Ryan Clark (“Clark”) was convicted of the following sixteen offenses: (1) two counts of rape as Class A felonies; (2) three counts of criminal deviate conduct as Class A felonies; (3) five counts of confinement as Class B felonies; (4) one count of robbery as a Cl
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 16‐3560 & 16‐3644 ESTATE OF RYAN L. CLARK, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. BRUCE WALKER and TINA KUEHN, Defendants‐Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States
Arizona Supreme Court · 2018-08-23 · Published · cited 49× · 425 P.3d 230
JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court: ¶1 The negligence claimant here recovered damages for dog-bite injuries he received when a law enforcement officer intentionally released a police dog against him. We today hold that plaintiffs cannot assert a negligence claim based solely on an officer's intentional use of physical force. The appropriate state-law claim is for battery, and an off
Coddington v. Clarkpublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 429 P.3d 649
REVERSED. REMAND.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017-10-25 · Published · cited 1× · 806 S.E.2d 280; 344 Ga. App. 58
Branch, Judge. *58 A jury found Jeremy Hilley guilty of using a computer Internet service to seduce a person he believed to be a child as well as two counts each of attempted aggravated child molestation and attempted child molestation. On appeal from his conviction for these crimes in Case N
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-12-10 · Published · cited 11× · 134 A.D.3d 1259; 21 N.Y.S.3d 469
*1260 Clark, J. Appeals (1) from two orders of the Family Court of Warren County (Breen, J.), dated September 19, 2013, which, among other things, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, denied petitioner’s motion to consolidate and vacated a prior order directing counseling, (2) from an order
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-03-29 · Published · cited 2× · 546 S.W.3d 268
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice This is an appeal from the award of costs related to a discovery motion. We affirm the district court as to its decision to make the award, but we vacate the order based on two problems with its form. FACTUAL SUMMARY Lori Vae Clark and Richard Alan Clark were divorced on November 26, 2011. In addition to dividing the couple's assets, the final dec
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-10-06 · Published · cited 2× · 143 A.D.3d 1030; 40 N.Y.S.3d 193
Garry, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller denying petitioner’s application for enhanced disability retirement benefits. Petitioner was employed as a highway maintenance worker for the New York State Department of Trans
Ryan v. Crumppublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-08-23 · Published · cited 0× · 68 So. 3d 359; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13231; 2011 WL 3676991
PER CURIAM. The Court has determined that the January 10, 2011, Order on Motion to Dismiss is not a final order. See Dedge v. Crosby, *360914 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. HAWKES, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013-09-30 · Published · cited 4× · 731 F.3d 66; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19925; 2013 WL 5422292
HOWARD, Circuit Judge. A federal law enforcement officer makes a lawful traffic stop and sees that the driver of the stopped car is intoxicated. He arrests the driver, even though the officer is outside of the jurisdiction in which he is authorized to make arrests. At the driver’s trial, does the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against “unreasonable searches and seizures” require t
Clark v. Bridgespublic domain
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 211 F. Supp. 3d 731; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135284; 2016 WL 5539530
OPINION AND ORDER Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge On August 27, 2014, Plaintiff Christine Clark (“Plaintiff’ or “Clark”) filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in the Court of Common Pleas for Laurens County, South Carolina, alleging that Defendants Brian K. Bridges (“Bridges”), Justin Moody (“Moody”), Robert R. Wilkie (‘Wilkie”), Ryan Abernathy (“Abernathy”), Brandon Scott (“Scott”), and Kenn
Clark v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2015-02-16 · Published · cited 21× · 296 Ga. 543; 769 S.E.2d 376; 2015 Ga. LEXIS 128
Nahmias, Justice. Appellant Constance Clark was convicted of malice murder and a firearm offense as a party to the shooting death of her husband, William Eric Clark. On appeal, she argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support her convictions and that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to offer unsworn testimony during the State’s opening
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-05-18 · Published · cited 19× · 856 F.3d 1248; 2017 WL 2174546
OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: This case arises from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)’s approval of a right-of-way on federal lands in Nevada for the construction of an industrial solar project, known as Silver State South, and the project’s possible impact on the desert tortoise. Plaintiff Defenders of Wildlife (DOW) contends that the Department
Clark v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014-12-10 · Published · cited 1× · 267 Or. App. 544; 340 P.3d 757; 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1701
GARRETT, J. In this post-conviction case, petitioner alleges that he received ineffective and inadequate assistance of counsel when his trial attorney made a statement on the record that contradicted petitioner’s own representations to the court. The post-conviction court rejected petitioner’s argument and denied the petition for relief. We affirm. Petitioner was indicted on one count of third-degree rape an