Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Clark v. Jewish Child Care Association, Inc.”
Clark v. Jewish Childcare Ass'npublic domain
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Sheniece Clark (“Plaintiff’ or “Clark”) brings this Action against Defendant Jewish Childcare Association, Inc. (“JCCA” or “Defendant”), alleging that Defendant engaged in discriminatory practices under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq. (the “ADA”). Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion For S
LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewishpublic domain
Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-19-2007 LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewish Precedential or Non
LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewish Community Center Ass'npublic domain
OPINION ROTH, Circuit Judge: In this employment discrimination case, a former employee of the Lancaster Jewish Community Center claimed discrimination on the basis of religion (evangelical Christianity) and retaliation for protected EEO activity. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer. *221We first f
368 F.Supp.2d 416 (2005) CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF MARYLAND, INC., et al. Plaintiffs v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al. Defendants No. CIV. PJM 03-162. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 24, 2005. *417 *418 Steven H. Aden, Esquire, Annandale, VA, H. Robert Showers,
in the Interest of K.I.B.C., a Childpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 23, 2014 Session MICHELLE RYE, and her Husband, RONALD RYE v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC d/b/a RUCH CLINIC, a Tennessee for-profit Limited Liability Company, and DIANE LONG, M.D. Interlocutory Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000920-09 Gina C. Higgins, Judge No. W2013
Bonnie Peltier v. Charter Day School, Inc.public domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1001 Doc: 134 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 103 ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.
Bonnie Peltier v. Charter Day School, Inc.public domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1023 Doc: 128 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 103 ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.
State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc.public domain
[As amended by order of the Supreme Court February 21, 2017.] Gordon McCloud, J. ¶1 The State of Washington bars discrimination in “public . . . accommodation [s]” on the basis of “sexual orientation.” RCW 49.60.215(1) (Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD)). Barronelle Stutzman owns and operates a place of public accommodation in our state: Arlene’s Flowers Inc. Stutzman and her public business, Arlen
New Hope Family Servs., Inc. v. Poolepublic domain
Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff New Hope Family Services, Inc. ("New Hope") commenced this civil rights action on December 6, 2018 challenging the constitutionality of the New York Office of Children and Family Services ("OCFS") interpretation and application of 18 N.Y.C.R.R. § 421.3(d). See Dkt. No. 1. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff's motion for
ACCEPTED 13-14-00756-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 3/2/2015 4:08:08 PM
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2392 Doc: 38 Filed: 01/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 34 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2392 ALIVE CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, INC., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
Schwarz v. Villages Charter School, Inc.public domain
AMENDED ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE comes before the Court as a disability discrimination action brought pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3603, et seq., and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794, et seq. Plaintiffs are thirty-two deaf pers
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commissionpublic domain
2024 WI 13 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP2007 COMPLETE TITLE: Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc., Barron County Developmental Services, Inc., Diversified Services, Inc., Black River Industries, Inc. and Headwaters, Inc., Petitione
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Johnson v. AutoZone, Inc.public domain
768 F.Supp.2d 1124 (2011) Peter JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. AUTOZONE, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. CV-09-S-0786-NE. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division. February 24, 2011. *1127 Temple D. Trueblood, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantazis PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. A. Kent Gieselmann, Jr.,
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.public domain
Held Invalid 26 C.F.R. § 54.9815-2713 (a)(1)(iv); 29 C.F.R. § 2590.715-2713 (a)(1)(iv);
SKMDV Holdings, Inc. v. Green Jacobson, P.C.public domain
ROY L. RICHTER, Judge Green Jacobson, P.C. (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment on a jury verdict, finding Appellant negligent and liable for the difference between the amount of money the jury believed Appellant’s former client, DataVerify, should have received under a contract, and the amount it did receive, based on an admitted error in drafting the contract. W
Liberty University, Inc. v. Jacob Lewpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ, Judge DAVIS, and Judge WYNN wrote the opinion. MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges: Liberty University and certain individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action challenging two provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: the “individual mandate,” which requires individuals to purc