Cases

SILBERMAN, Judge. In September 2014, Sylvia Willis was walking on a paved pathway in Sun City Center when she was hit' by an underin-sured golf cart. Her underinsured/unin-sured motorist (UM) insurance carrier, Arnica Mutual Insurance Company, denied benefits because the golf cart was not an “uninsured motor vehicle” under a policy exclusion. Arnica and Willis took the dispute to cour

fermont Superior Court Filed Washington 25 VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit

Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered June 19, 2014 in Albany County, which, among other things, granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint(s). Plaintiffs own a three-level home in the Town of Colonie, Albany County; plaintiffs previously utilized the main and second floors of the structu

RULING ON THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL MARTINEZ, United States Magistrate Judge. This is a bad faith action against an insurer for failing to settle an insurance claim. Presently pending before the court is a discovery dispute in which the court is called upon to decide whether the defendant must produce documents containing the confidential advice and work product of its attorney.

PER CURIAM: We affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion, dated October 6, 1988, filed October 7, 1988, and attached hereto as an Appendix. APPENDIX Paul M. Matia and Wendy L. Matia, Plaintiffs, v. Carpet Transport, Inc., and Continental Insurance Co., Defendants.

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. The principal issue in this automobile accident diversity case is whether a Rhode Island statute requires that an insurer pay prejudgment interest over and above its policy limits to the plaintiff. We hold that the statute does so require. Some background facts are necessary. I. Plaintiff-appellee, Melin

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 952 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 953 OPINION This case is before this Court as a consolidation of three appeals, Docket Nos. 870488-CA, 880032-CA,

ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 32; Report), entered by the Honorable Patricia D. Barksdale, United States Magistrate Judge, on February 9, 2015. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Barks-dale recommends that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 8; Motion to Remand) be denied. S

Batchelder, J. The defendants appeal a declaratory judgment granted by the Superior Court {Goode, J.) in favor of Amica Mutual Insurance Company (Amica). The issue is whether the insurance company is obligated to provide coverage for and defend defendant Timothy Zinck as a “person insured” under his parents’ Amica automobile insurance policy with respect to an automobile accident in which Timothy was driving a “nonowned”

MAIN, Justice. Following an automobile accident in which Tracy Mitchell was injured when the vehicle in which she was an occupant was struck by a vehicle being driven by Amy Kirk, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), Mitchell’s insurer, paid Mitchell’s medical expenses, among other coverage payments, and then sought, through subrogation, reimbursement from Kirk’s insurer, Cotton States Mutual Insura

958 A.2d 620 (2008) MERRIMACK MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ronald H. DUFAULT et al. No. 2007-196-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. October 17, 2008. *621 Kathryn Hopkins, Cranston, for Plaintiff. Wayne Resmini, Providence, for Defendants. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, J

964 N.E.2d 796 (2012) Hannah LAKES, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee (Defendant below). No. 89S05-1109-CT-531. Supreme Court of Indiana. March 20, 2012. *797 David W. Craig, Scott A. Faultless, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Carolyn M. Trier, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorney for

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 93-1641 MELINDA RYAN ARMACOST, Plaintiff, Appellee, v.

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2021 ME 12 Docket: Pen-20-18 Argued: February 10, 2021 Decided: March 16, 2021 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. PHILIP L. CLARK JABAR, J. [¶1] Philip L. Clark appeals from a judgment of

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

114 F.Supp.2d 51 (2000) Ellen M. PECK, Plaintiff, v. PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 3:99CV886 (GLG). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 31, 2000. *52 Thomas C. Clark, Tyler Cooper & Alcorn, Hartford, CT, John W. Mills, Murphy & Karpie, Bridgeport, CT, for plaintiff. Thomas

OPINION GARBARINO, Judge. ¶ 1 This is a declaratory judgment action filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Its insured, Jack Boyle, drove his friend, Bobby Sims, to Sims’ automobile. Sims, who was drunk, drove and caused an accident in which the appellant’s wife was killed. The question is whether the accident was the result of the use of Boyle’s vehicle within the meaning of Boyle’s ins

*564On February 10, 2006, a water pipe burst in the second floor of the plaintiff’s house, causing extensive water damage. The home was covered by a homeowners’ insurance policy issued by the defendants Encompass Insurance Company of America and Encompass Insurance Company (hereinafter together Encompass). Following the occurrence, the plaintiff filed an insurance claim with Encompass. However, aft

*564On February 10, 2006, a water pipe burst in the second floor of the plaintiff’s house, causing extensive water damage. The home was covered by a homeowners’ insurance policy issued by the defendants Encompass Insurance Company of America and Encompass Insurance Company (hereinafter together Encompass). Following the occurrence, the plaintiff filed an insurance claim with Encompass. However, aft

PRESENT: All the Justices FRANK JONES, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 032632 JUSTICE G. STEVEN AGEE September 17, 2004 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK Everett A. Martin, Jr., Judge The sole issue in this appeal is whether territorial restrictions on coverage for medical expenses under c