Cases

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of a personal injury action for failure to prosecute and for failure of plaintiffs’ counsel to comply with orders of the court. The first issue before us concerns our appellate jurisdiction. The district court’s order of dismissal wa

MEMORANDUM CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief Judge. This is a consolidated civil action filed by plaintiffs Clark Distribution Systems, Inc. (“CDS”) and Clark Group, Inc. (“Clark”) against American Logistics Group, Inc., operating as ALG Direct, Inc. (“ALG”). CDS, a freight forwarder, alleges that ALG, a logistics provider and distributor of printed materials, breached the parties’ Transportation Se

MARINELIS SENA, ADMINISTRATRIX (ESTATE OF TYRONE O. TILLMAN), ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE OF CONNECTICUT, INC., ET AL. (SC 19971) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Vertefeuille, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 28-13 [a]), ‘‘[n]either the state nor any political subdivi- sion of the state . . . complying with or attempting to comply with [c

MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. (“MRIS”) filed suit against Defendants American Home Realty Network (“AHRN”) and AHRN CEO Jonathan Cardella on March 28, 2012, alleging copyright infringement, violations of the Lanham Act, and tortious conversion and unjust enrichment. Doc. No. 1. MRIS’s claims are based on AHR

628 Argued and submitted January 15; decision of Court of Appeals affirmed, decision of circuit court reversed, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings July 9, 2020 Scott Raymond BUSCH, Respondent on Review, and Deanne Marie BUSCH, Plaintiff, v. McINN

OPINION OF THE COURT Leonard B. Austin, J. I. Preliminary Matters A. The Pleadings This action was commenced by plaintiff, National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. (NMHC), alleging five causes of action against its former employee, defendant, Joseph Fallarino. The trial of this matter addressed the first two causes of action which sought rescis

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants brought this action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., against defendant-appellee American Medical Response, Inc. (“AMR”), alleging (1) in a qui tam claim, that AMR made false statements and submitted false claims to

OPINION Thomas P. Griesa, U.S. District Judge In this employment discrimination action, the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment and partial summary judgment on plaintiffs claims under *731the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2012), and under the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”), N.Y. City Admin.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge. Gerardo Campos, his wife Yadira Veguilla-Rosario, their legal conjugal partnership, and their minor child C.C.V. initiated the instant action under Puerto Rico law against Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.; Makita USA, Inc.; National Rental and Sales, Inc.; and Tool Box, Inc., seeking redress for damages arising out of Campos’ alleged exposure to a chemical

Opinion by RONALD J. STUBBLEFIELD, Judge: T1 This is an appeal by a workers' compensation insurance carrier from the Trial Court's order granting summary judgment to a third-party tortfeasor in carrier's action seeking to recover workers' compensation benefits paid to an injured worker. The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Okla. Sup.Ct. R. 1.36, 12 0.9.2001, ch. 15, app. 1. Based

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER P.K HOLMES, III, Chief Judge. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. 12) and brief in support; Defendant American Medical Systems, Inc.’s (“AMS”) Response in Opposition *902(Doc. 18); and Defendant Johnson Regional Medical Center’s (“JRMC”) Response in Opposition (Doc. 19). For the reasons di

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 65]. This case arises from the surgical implantation of a medical device and the injuries sustained from its failure and removal.1 For the reasons described below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 65] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.2

43 A.3d 111 (2012) 304 Conn. 585 G. Berry SCHUMANN v. DIANON SYSTEMS, INC. No. 18655. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued May 18, 2011. Decided May 1, 2012. *114 Gregory A. Castanias, pro hac vice, with whom were Leon F. DeJulius, Jr., pro hac vice, Daniel A. Schwartz, Hartford, and, on t

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FIRSTSTRING RESEARCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0332-KSJM ) JSS MEDICAL RESEARCH INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Da

(2007) NEOTONUS, INC., Plaintiff v. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION and American Urological Association, Defendants. Civil No. 1:04-CV-2050-TTC. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 3, 2007. ORDER JACK T. CAMP, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on Defendant American Medical Associati

808 So.2d 999 (2001) KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY-AMERICA, INC., et al. v. INTEGRATED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 1000580. Supreme Court of Alabama. July 6, 2001. *1001 William A. Scott, Jr., Wayne Morse, and Bradley J. Smith of Clark & Scott, P.C., Birmingham, for appellants. Tom Burgess, Thomas S. Hale, and Murray H. Gibson, Jr.,

651 So.2d 209 (1995) AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner, v. William Grady OSBORNE, Sr., and Pamela Phillips Osborne, his wife, Respondents. No. 94-04354. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 1, 1995. *210 Sharon Lee Stedman, Sharon Lee Stedman, P.A., Orlando, for petitioner. Gordon James, III

Krauser, C.J. The issue before us is whether Western Surety Company, the appellee, is bound by the mandatory arbitration clause of an agreement between Schneider Electric Buildings Critical Systems, Inc., the appellant, and National Control Services, Inc. (“NCS”), as that agreement was later incorporated by reference into a subcontract

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. DUFFIN, U.S. Magistrate Judge I. Introduction Plaintiffs Jerome Janusz, Sharon Jan-usz, and Patrice Jardanowski filed the present action against various entities, including Symmetry Medical, Inc. (Symmetry), which was allegedly involved in the design, testing, manufacture, sale, distribution, marketing, or similar actions of the M-Cor Modular Hip Syste

ADKINS, J. In this case we must determine the relevance of, and how to prove, a hospital’s alleged retaliatory animus in refusing to renew a physician’s privileges on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (“HCQIA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 11101-11152 (1994). After Harford Memorial Hospital (“Harford”) declined to renew the privileges of Dr. Linda Freilich,1