Cases

941 F.Supp. 765 (1996) Clarence FLOWERS, Petitioner, v. Craig HANKS, Respondent. No. 3:96-CV-0483 AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. September 17, 1996. *766 *767 Clarence Flowers, Wabash Valley Correctional Institution, Carlisle, IN, pro se. Cornell Co

528 N.E.2d 57 (1988) Clarence FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 79S00-8612-CR-1020. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 13, 1988. *58 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender, David P. Freund, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, for appellant. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Richard C. Webster, Deputy Atty

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Stephenson, including the deposition testimony of Dr. Steven A. Siciliano, Dr. Kern Carlton and Dr. Jeffrey Ewert, and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their

The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner William Bost and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award, except with the modification of Findings of Fact #16, Conclusions of Law #8 and Award #4 and #5.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANDREW MATTIODA, No. 22-15889 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:20-cv- v. 03662-SVK CLARENCE WILLIAM NELSON II; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND OPINION SPACE ADMINISTRATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States Distric

NANCY F. ATLAS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This employment dispute was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dena Palermo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) by Order [Doc. # 9] entered November 13, 2017. On November 13, 2018, Magistrate Judge Palermo issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 39], re

Goolsby, Judge: This action involves the review under the South Carolina Administrative Procedures Act, S.C. Code, Ann. §§ 1-23-310 et seq. (1986), of a decision by South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation that an outdoor advertising sign owned by Eugene M. Flowers, Steve Flowers, Frederick A. Miller, III, Gerald L. Millis, and Fred A. Miller, Jr., doing business as Stuckey’s of Coosawhatchi, Inc.

BOYD, Justice. Clarence T. Flowers is appealing directly to this Court his conviction in the Seminole County Court. The conviction was for falsely reporting the commission of a crime in violation of Section 817.49, Florida Statutes. During proceedings in the trial court he challenged the statute’s constitutional validity. The trial judge upheld it. We have jurisdiction of the appeal. Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Con

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00368-CR Clarence Donald, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 05-904009, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

880 So.2d 887 (2004) STATE of Louisiana v. Crondell FLOWERS. No. 04-KA-190. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. July 27, 2004. Honorable Harry J. Morel, Jr., District Attorney, David L. Chaisson, Assistant District Attorney, Hahnville, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Mark A. Marino, Destrehan, LA, for Defendant/Appellant. Panel composed of Judges

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00368-CR Clarence Donald, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICI

535 F.Supp.2d 765 (2008) Thomas FLOWERS, et al., Plaintiffs v. REGENCY TRANSPORTATION, IN and Timothy Foster, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06CV610TSL-JCS. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. January 25, 2008. *766 Lisa Mishune Ross, Lisa M. Ross, Attorney, Jackson, MS, for Plaintiffs. Jennif

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00468-CR Clarence Macvey Donald, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00468-CR Clarence Macvey Donald, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-04-205413, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPI

GARRETT, J. In this community property partition case, the ex-husband appeals from a judgment which was amended by the trial court to increase the amount he owed his ex-wife by more than $11,000. He claims that the amendment was substantive and thus prohibited under La. C.C.P. art. 1951. We affirm the trial court's amended judgment. FACTS Pamela S. Smith and James H. Smith were marr

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00555-CR Clarence Jones, Appellant v.

714 N.E.2d 577 (1999) 306 Ill. App.3d 259 239 Ill.Dec. 658 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur J. FLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 3-97-0689. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. July 14, 1999. *578 Daniel D. Yuhas, Deputy Defender (Court-appo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Submitted on Briefs February 14, 2006 CHARLES C. WILEY v. CLARENCE WILLIAMS, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 05-6-221 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor No. E2005-02518-COA-R3-CV - FILED APRIL 10, 2006 The issues presented in this appeal are whether the trial court

14 July 1999 No. 3--97--0689 _________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 1999 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE ) Appeal from the Circuit Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: This diversity case involves only the question whether, under Mississippi law, a radio transmission tower, affixed by the tower’s lessee to a concrete base on leased real estate, became a fixture so that, on termination of the real estate lease for nonpayment of rental, the tower became the landowner’s