Cases

OPINION MERIDETH A. JURY, Bankruptcy Judge. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ELIGIBILITY OPINION A major creditor of the City of San Bernardino, the California Public Employee Retirement System, objected to the eligibility of the City to file a petition under chapter 91 of the Bankruptcy Code on the grounds that it did not desire to effect a plan of adjustment and did no

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE ISSUANCE OF THIRD PARTY INJUNCTION IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 9 PLAN Meredith A. Jury, United States Bankruptcy Judge Facing a cash flow crisis of significant magnitude in the summer of 2012 with no end in sight, the City of San Bernardino (“City”) declared an emergency under state law and filed a petition under Chapter 91 in the Bankrup

OPINION OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Appellant San Bernardino City Professional Firefighters Local 891 (“Firefighters”) appeals from the bankruptcy court’s order denying its motion for relief from stay (“Stay Motion”). The bankruptcy court held that the Firefighters could not pursue an action in state court against Debtor-Appellee City of San Bernardino

*492OPINION OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Appellant San Bernardino City Professional Firefighters Local 891 (the “Union”) appeals the “Order Denying Motion of San Bernardino City Professional Firefighters For Relief From the Automatic Stay” entered by the United State Bankruptcy Court for the Central District o

OPINION OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Appellant San Bernardino City Professional Firefighters Local 891 (the “Union”) appeals an order from the United State Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Riverside Division, that granted in part and denied in part the City of San Bernardino’s (the “City”) motion to reject a memorandum of understanding bet

OPINION OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED ' STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Appellants Raymond Newberry, Patricia Mendoza, Maria Aboytia, Juana Pulido, Jesus Pulido, Jonathan Pulido, Richard Gonzalez Lozada, Melinda McNeal, Bertha Lozada, Mildred Lytwynec, Nicholas Lytwynec, Gloria Basua, Lizabeth Banue-los, and Carlos Ochoa (collectively “New-berry”) appeal from an order denying them relie

ORDER RE APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL AND MOTION REQUESTING CERTIFICATION FOR DIRECT APPEAL TO NINTH CIRCUIT DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Appellant California Public Employees’ Retirement -System’s (“CalPERS”) motion for leave to appeal and motion requesting 'certification for direct appeal to the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci

CODRINGTON, J. I. INTRODUCTION This matter relates to a proposed development in the Highland Hills area of the City of San Bernardino that has been pending in various permutations for decades. Plaintiffs and appellants The Inland Oversight Committee (IOC), CREED-21, and Highland Hills Homeowners Association (HOA) filed the present lawsuit in 2015, contending that proposed changes to the project violate the Californ

Filed 11/25/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANTONIO JUAREZ et al., D084517 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Super. Ct. No. CVRI2203422) SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of th

Filed 8/10/22; Certified for Publication 9/6/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO C.I., a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, E076212 v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1725293) SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED

Filed 5/24/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, C092003 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-20

Filed 9/14/18; Certified for Publication 9/27/18 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE INLAND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE et al., E064836 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1509296

LIU, J., Concurring and Dissenting.—I agree with today’s opinion that the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act (CANRA; Pen. Code, § 11166) imposed on the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department (Sheriff’s Department) a mandatory duty to inform the county child welfare agency of Christy Kinney’s 911 report of child abuse. (Pen. Code, § 11166, subd. (k); all undesignated statutory references are

JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge. Pravin D. Patel and twenty other named plaintiffs sued the city of San Bernardino, California for damages stemming from the city’s enforcement of an unlawful tax. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. I. The plaintiffs are owners and operators of hotels in the city of Sa

325 F.Supp.2d 1087 (2004) La France HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants. No. ED CV 00-107-RT. United States District Court, C.D. California, Eastern Division. July 7, 2004. Benjamin E. Wizner, Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Joe H. Freeman, *1088 III, Robe

75 Cal.Rptr.3d 353 (2008) 43 Cal.4th 400 181 P.3d 159 MANTA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Cross-complainant and Respondent, v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Cross-defendant and Appellant. No. S144492. Supreme Court of California. April 24, 2008. *355 Arias, Lockwood & Gray, Arias & Lock

BAXTER, J., Concurring and Dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the judgment insofar as it reverses the judgment of the Court of Appeal. I concur in the judgment insofar as it affirms that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeal holding that the City of San Bernardino (the City) retains the right to administer prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). I do not agree that the Legislature

69 Cal.Rptr.3d 917 (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 749 Edward C. NORTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. No. G038697. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three. January 4, 2008. *918 Law Offices of Granowitz, White and Weber and

107 F.Supp.2d 1239 (2000) La France HAMILTON v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et. al. No. EDCV00-107RT(RNBX). United States District Court, C.D. California. August 9, 2000. *1240 Daniel P. Tokaji, Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Robert A. Seeman, Joe H. Freeman, Seeman and Freeman, Glendale,

174 Cal.App.4th 953 (2009) P.S., a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. M.A., a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. C.R., a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. M.V.,