Cases

OPINION REGARDING MOTION TO INTERVENE ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Alleging misconduct in home mortgage practices, the United States and numerous *117 State attorneys general sued major mortgagees including Citigroup, Ine.; Citibank, N.A.; and CitiMortgage,

Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge: This case is one of dozens seeking to recover for harm allegedly resulting from a conspiracy among major banks to manipulate the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), a set of benchmark interest rates that affect financial transactions worth trillions of dollars. Plaintiffs-Appellants Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab Bank, N.A., Charles Sch

646 F.Supp.2d 489 (2009) ADELPHIA RECOVERY TRUST, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 9050(LMM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 29, 2009. *491 Andrew Weissmann, Richard Ferdinand Ziegler, Jenner & Block LLP, David M. Friedman, Michael Craig Harwood, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. John Calon obtained a $20,001 home equity loan from Countrywide Home Loans in November 2000. Bank of America acquired or took over Countrywide in early 2008. In December 2014, Calon filed a pro se complaint asserting five causes of action against Bank of America, N.A. and affiliates (collectively, "Bank of America"). At the district court's direction, Calon filed a

Margulies, J. *727Tobias Kahan purchased property in Richmond, California at a foreclosure sale. Shortly before the sale, the City of Richmond (City) had recorded a "special assessment" lien against the property for unpaid garbage collection fees, pursuant to a municipal ordinance. When Kahan later sold the property, he had to pay the delinquen

Filed 5/23/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE TOBIAS KAHAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, A150866 v. CITY OF RICHMOND, (Contra Costa County Super.

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The City of Miami has brought an ambitious fair housing lawsuit against Bank of America, 1 alleging that it engaged in a decade-long pattern of discriminatory lending in the residential housing market that caused the City economic harm. The City claims that the bank targeted black and Latino custo

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2018 UT 58 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellant, v. LORAINE SUNDQUIST and JOHN DOE/JANE DOE/ OCCUPANT DOUG KAHLER, an individual,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOKESH B. VUYYURU, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:21-cv-762 (TNM) BANK OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Lokesh B. Vuyyuru brought this suit alleging Defendants acted unlawfully throughout a 2016 foreclos

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Phillip Francis Luke Hughes, on behalf of the Estate of Jane K. Hughes, Petitioner, v. Bank of America National Association, Respondent. Appellate Case Nos. 2021-001339 and 2022-000079 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Spartanburg County R. Keith Kelly and Grace Gilchrist Knie, Circuit Court Judges Opinion No. 28187 Heard March

PRESENT: All the Justices TAMARA E. YOUNG-ALLEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 181313 JUSTICE TERESA M. CHAFIN APRIL 2, 2020 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Lisa Bondareff Kemler, Judge Tamara E. Young-Allen contends that the Circuit Court of the

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Phillip Francis Luke Hughes, on behalf of the Estate of Jane K. Hughes, Petitioner, v. Bank of America National Association, Respondent. Appellate Case Nos. 2021-001339 and 2022-000079 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Spartanburg County R. Keith Kelly and Grace Gilchrist Knie, Circuit Court Judges Opinion No. 28187 Heard March

MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDREWS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ursala A. Garnett appears pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. She commenced this employment discrimination action against Defendant Bank of America on July 14, 2014. (D.I. 2). The complaint alleges employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U

On Direct Appeal Justice Durham, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶1 This case involves a nonjudicial foreclosure sale conducted in violation of Utah Code section 57-1-21, which requires the trustee of the sale to maintain a physical office location within the state. Today we answer the question left open in

DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Appellants purchased financial instruments, mainly issued by the defendant banks, that carried a rate of return indexed to. the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), which approximates the average rate at which a group of designated banks can borrow money. Appellees, 16 of the world’s largest banks (“the Banks”), were on the panel of banks that determined LIBOR each business day based, in par

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for misappropriation of funds and fraud, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Troia, J.), dated June 23, 2014, as granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint and denied that branch of their cross motion which was for relief pursuant to CPLR 5222 (c).

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. The matter comes before the Court on the MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 6) filed by Parallon Enterprises, LLC (misnamed in the Complaint as HCA). The defendant also challenges the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction over Jones’ Title VII and ADA retaliation claims, though the motion does not make the challenge

MEMORANDUM OPINION LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Bank of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 13]. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND This civil action concerns pro se plaintiff Joseph A. Stallard’s allegations that defendant Bank of America (“Bank” or the “defenda

WAGNER, Senior Judge: Appellants, Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of America Corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as Bank of America or the Bank), appeal from an order of the trial court denying the Bank’s motion to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) of the District of Columbia’s claims for damages for losses incurred as the result of a protract

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN T. COPENHAVER, JR., District Judge. Pending is plaintiffs’ motion to remand, filed May 31, 2011. Also pending are the motion of defendant Thomas A. Zamow (“nondiverse defendant”) to dismiss, filed *969September 8, 2011, and the motion of defendants Bank of America, N.A. (“Countrywide”), BAC Home Loans