Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 29, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D20-1154 and 3D20-1197 Lower Tribunal Nos. 20-2464, 20-2466 ________________ BREA 3-2 LLC, etc., et al., Appella

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. D

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, No. 15-16585 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:14-cv-04785- EMC AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a limited liability company, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Vermont Unit Docket No. 74-6-13 Vtec In re Connor Group, LLP Major Site Plan and Conditional Use Application DECISION ON THE MERITS This appeal concerns a new development proposed for the property located at 13 Maiden Lane in the City of Saint Al

GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, CHIEF JUDGE This limitation action arises out of an alleged accident on Tenkiller Ferry Lake in northeastern Oklahoma. Before the court is the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 14] filed by claimant Katie Lee Osborn. She contends, inter alia , that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction because the lake is not a "navigable waterway" for purposes of federal admiralty jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth be

Slip Op 20-80 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE DAK AMERICAS LLC, INDORAMA VENTURES USA, INC., and NAN YA PLASTICS CORPORATION, AMERICA, Plaintiffs, v. Before: Gary S. Katzmann, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 18-00238 Defendant, PUBLIC VERSION and

447 B.R. 1 (2011) In re WOLVERINE, PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, LLC, Debtor. Lynne F. Riley, Chapter 7 Trustee of Wolverine, Proctor & Schwartz, LLC, Plaintiff v. Tencara, LLC, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 06-10815-JNF. Adversary No. 07-1179. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. January 21, 2011. *4 Annapoorni Sankar

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-SA-01088-SCT THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, THE HONORABLE MICHAEL WATSON v. JOHN BRET ALDRICH, CITY OF BILOXI, BILOXI PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/23/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES B. PERSONS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: BEN HARRY STONE GINA BARDWELL TOMPK

653 F.3d 241 (2011) PERNOD RICARD USA, LLC, Appellant v. BACARDI U.S.A., INC. No. 10-2354. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued February 9, 2011. Filed: August 4, 2011. *243 David H. Bernstein [argued], Carl J. Micarelli, Debevoise & Plimpton, Eric R. Hubbard, Margaret C. Lu, Vincent N. Palla

SELYA, Circuit Judge. As the millennium dawned, American financial markets soared to new heights. One of the vehicles that propelled this dizzying flight involved the bundling and securitization of residential mortgage loans. 1 But all good things come to an end, cf. Geoffrey Chaucer, Troilus and Crise

OPINION AND ORDER SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. Commenting on the importance of speaking clearly and listening closely, Phillip Roth memorably quipped, “The English language is a form of communication! ... Words aren’t only bombs and bullets — no, they’re little gifts, containing meanings!”1 What is true in love is equally true at law: Lawyers and their clients need to c

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ‘ THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Padilla’s Motion for Summary' Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity, filed April 10, 2015 (Doc. 25)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on October 9, 2015. The primary issue is whether Defendant Pablo Padilla, a police officer with

Filed 3/27/23 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT PACIFIC PALISADES B306658 RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION, INC., Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS174471 Petitioner and Appellant,

Filed 3/8/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT PACIFIC PALISADES B306658 RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION, INC., Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BS174471 v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents; RONY SHRAM et al

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0023 ══════════ Jonathan Timothy Noyes, Petitioner, v. The State of Texas ex rel. Samantha Jo Voges, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for t

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) DAVID L. de CSEPEL, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. )

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. This is a case about abuse of governmental power by senior officials, in the federal government. Although technically framed as a request for disclosure of certain information in the files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation- (“FBI”) pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act *503(“FOIA”), at bottom

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT SAINT LUKE’S HOSPITAL OF ) KANSAS CITY, ) ) Appellant-Respondent, ) WD83388 v. ) (Consolidated with WD83418,

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant-Movant Robert L. Hammons' Motion to Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed June 24, 2016 (CIV Doc. 6)(CR Doc. 114)("Motion"); (ii) the United States Magistrate Judge's Proposed Finding

USCA11 Case: 19-10308 Date Filed: 01/13/2021 Page: 1 of 27 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10308 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 2:16-cv-08101-CLS, 2:9