Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Massey”
RANDY KELLEY v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANYpublic domain
FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., BROWN and HODGES, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June 29, 2022
Cincinnati Insurance v. Centech Building Corp.public domain
286 F.Supp.2d 669 (2003) The CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, the Cincinnati Casualty Company, and the Cincinnati Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs, v. CENTECH BUILDING CORPORATION, William Massey & Associates A.K.A. William Massey & Associates, Inc., William H. Massey, Dynamic Development Group, LLC., BB & T Bank of South Carolina, Betty Harbin Little, and Lanneau William Lambert, Jr., Defendants, and Dynamic Development Group, LLC, Def
Massey v. Graypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant District of Columbia’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 9. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND
EDITH GARRIDO v. SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANYpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 12, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-151 Lower Tribunal Nos. 17-16701 CC & 20-150 AP ________________ Edith Garrido, Appellant,
State ex rel. Cincinnati v. Indus. Comm.public domain
[Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati v. Indus. Comm., 2023-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. City of Cincinnati, : Relator, : No. 21AP-702 v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., :
State ex rel. Cincinnati v. Indus. Comm.public domain
[Cite as State ex rel. Cincinnati v. Indus. Comm., 2024-Ohio-4915.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. City of Cincinnati, : Relator, : No. 22AP-431 v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., :
*1278 MILBURN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff University of Cincinnati appeals the district court’s grant of defendant Arkwright Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment in this diversity action in which plaintiff seeks a declaration that the insurance policy it obtained from defendant covered
Barnes, Presiding Judge. *81 Gloria Silva appeals the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company ("Liberty Mutual") on Silva's uninsured / underinsured motorist ("UM") claim, which arose in the context of Silva's personal injury suit to recov
In the Estate of J.W. Massey v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-22-00127-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG HOWARD ADAMS, Appellant, v. MICHELLE CAROL ATKINSON, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF J.W. MASSEY, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 130TH DISTRICT COURT OF MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS NUMBER 13-22-00128-CV
336 F.Supp.2d 552 (2004) THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, the Cincinnati Casualty Company, and the Cincinnati Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs, v. DYNAMIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC., and BB & T Bank Of South Carolina, Defendants. No. 1:00CV00280, No. 1:00CV00281, No. 1:00CV00282, No. 1:00CV00283, No. 1:00CV00284. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. September 17, 2
SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER and COOMER, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules September 2, 2
ORDER HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon appeal from the judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. Appellants argue that the bankruptcy court erred by finding that Massey, Seeskin and Associates was not an actual partnership or a partnership by estoppel. The determinative issue of law presented
Miller v. University of Cincinnatipublic domain
ENTRY AND ORDER CERTIFYING A CLASS CONSISTING OF ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI WOMEN’S ROWING TEAM, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS. (DOC. 7). ROSE, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class. Doc. 7. Therein, Plaintiffs request that the Court certify a class consisting of “All present, prospective and future participa
Tommy Morgan v. New York Life Insurance Companypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0096p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - TOMMY G. MOR
Muffley Ex Rel. NLRB v. Massey Energy Co.public domain
(2008) Gary W. MUFFLEY, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-00073. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division. April 14, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION &
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana Garvin Street Warehouse, LLC and KSAB, LLC, FILED Appellants-Plaintiffs Jul 15 2026, 10:39 am CLERK v.
Glover v. Masseypublic domain
PATTON, J., This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from a jury verdict that awarded plaintiff Frances Glover the sum of $24,696 as compensation for injuries she sustained when she slipped and fell in defendant Joseph Massey's basement. Defendant appeals from that verdict and assigns the following errors for review: I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT GRANTING DEFENDANT-APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR A DIRECTED VER
Massey v. Akron City Board of Educationpublic domain
82 F.Supp.2d 735 (2000) Joshua MASSEY, et al., Joseph Labay, et al., Brian Devericks, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AKRON CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Nos. 5:99-CV-1350, 5:99-CV-1351, 5:99-CV-1996. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. January 19, 2000. *736 *737
Fox v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.public domain
*657 ORDER COOK, Chief Judge. In 1993, Varity Corporation (Varity) unilaterally modified a retirement health program that had been established for the benefit of its employees through the collective bargaining process prior to its acquisition of the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, Masseyr Ferguson, Inc. (Massey-Ferguson). Varity’s administ
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Rutherfordpublic domain
On Direct Appeal Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 Danny Rutherford suffered extensive injuries when the work van he was driving was hit by a vehicle that had run a red light. Mr. Rutherford sought compensation from both his employer’s workers’ compensation insurer and Truck Insurance Ex