Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED January 2024 Term May 9, 2024 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK

WORKMAN, Justice: Petitioner/plaintiff below Christopher Adkins (hereinafter “petitioner”) appeals the Circuit Court of. Kanawha County’s August 30, 2013, order granting summary judgment to respondenVdefendant below American Mine Research, Inc. (hereinafter “AMR”) in this case brought pursuant to West Virginia Code § 21-5-1 et seq., (2013 Repl.Vol.) the “Wage Pa

FILED October 6, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OF WEST VIRGINIA

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED CHRISTOPHER F., March 9, 2016 Petitioner Below, Petitioner released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY, II CLERK

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED May 23, 2024 JAMES WILEY D/B/A WILEY’S CONSTRUCTION, ASHLEY N. DEEM, DEPUTY CLERK Defendant Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2022 Term FILED _____________________ November 3, 2022 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK No. 21-0263 SUPREME COURT OF APP

Hutchison, Justice: This appeal arises from a habeas corpus proceeding and was brought by Christopher J. (hereinafter "Petitioner") from the October 6, 2017, order of the Circuit Court of Berkeley County. 1 In this appeal the Petitioner argues that the circuit court erred in finding (1) that he could not be co

FILED April 20, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. ^Plaintiffs, Thelma, and Richard Berry, appeal a judgment in favor of defendant, the Parish of Jefferson, finding that the Parish’s action in calling for a zoning and land use study of a 23-acre area in Terry-town, Louisiana, that included the Berrys’ immovable property, which ultimately resulted in rezoning of the'Berrys’ property, was not arbitrary and capricious, and thus did'not constitute ¿'reg

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG NUMBER 13-09-00112-CR CHADRICK B. PATE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas Coun

68 P.3d 513 (2002) Christopher M. COLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA), Defendant-Appellant. No. 01CA2542. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. October 10, 2002. Certiorari Denied May 12, 2003.[*] *514 Law Firm of Richard P. Ranson, Richard P. Ranson, Colorado Spring

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2014 Term FILED September 18, 2014 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK No. 14-0233

Riley, Judge. [1] Appellant-Plaintiff, Collins Asset Group, LLC (CAG), filed a petition for rehearing, requesting us to reconsider our memorandum decision issued on December 6, 2018. In our decision, we affirmed the trial court's dismissal, finding that CAG's action was barred by the six-year statute of limitation pursuant to

GRISBAUM, Judge. This opinion arises out of a matter which was remanded to us from the Louisiana Supreme Court for the sole purpose of addressing the assignments of error raised by the Celotex Corporation (Celotex), the worker’s compensation intervenor 601 S.2d 1349. We amend in part and affirm in part. PACTS Plaintiff, Godfrey Cosse, was injured during the course and scope of his empl

FILED Feb 17 2020, 11:59 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED September 30, 2025 DAVID R., ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Respondent Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

GRISBAUM, Judge. This appeal concerns a products liability matter arising out of an industrial accident at Celotex’s Marrero plant in which the plaintiff, Mr. Godfrey Cosse (Celotex employee), sustained serious injuries. We reverse. The pivotal issue presented is whether the trial court committed reversible error in finding the plaintiff (employee) five percent at fault. FACTS

SUZETTE M. CHAISSON * NO. 2021-CA-0669 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE * COMPANY, ZURICH FOURTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN INSURANCE * COMPANY, CRESCENT STATE OF LOUISIANA CROWN DISTRIBUTING, LLC, * * * * * * * JOHNNY J. PARKER, JR., AND GARRETT S. GILLEN, JR. APPEAL FROM