Cases

163 P.3d 540 (2007) 2007 OK 52 Timothy N. TOMA, Administrator of the estate of Margaret E. Meszaros, Plaintiff, v. Claire Henrietta TOMA, Matthew C. Toma, and Jill Renee Toma, f/k/a Jill Renee Eddy, Defendants, and Claire Henrietta Toma, in her capacity as settlor and trustee of the Claire Henrietta Toma Revocable Trust u/a dtd 12/30/2003, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Timothy N. Toma, in his individual capacity and

CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Petitioners appeal from decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their applications for withholding of deportation under section 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h), and for asylum under section 208 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1158.

VILLANTI, Chief Judge. Erie Insurance Exchange appeals the trial court’s order that denied its motion to dismiss Albert Christopher Larose’s complaint, which was based on the argument that the Florida courts did not have personal jurisdiction over Erie, an out-of-state insurance company that does no business in Florida. 1

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/21/2017 08:07 AM CST - 521 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 24 Nebraska A ppellate R eports IN RE INTEREST OF ELIJAH P. ET AL. Cite as 24 Neb. App. 521

Kulik, J. ¶1 Guardianship is a statutory alternative to termination of parental rights. Guardianship is designed to establish permanency for children in foster care through the appointment of a guardian and dismissal of the dependency. RCW 13.36.010. The Department of Social and Health Services (Department) filed a petition to appoint a guardian for D.S. Prior to the petition, the Department’s permanency plan for D.S. was reuni

VIGIL, Judge. {1} The district court upheld the decision of the Director of the New Mexico Human Services Department, Medical Assistance Division (HSD/MAD) to recoup Medicaid payments made to Princeton Place (Princeton), a nursing home located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The claim was that Princeton was not entitled to Medicaid payments for services provided to a resident, J.F., because

PER CURIAM Petitioners (Central Oregon LandWatch and Tomas Finnegan Ryan) seek review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that affirmed in part a decision of the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners to adopt certain amendments to the county’s comprehensive plan (post-acknowledgment plan amendments) and zoning ordinances pertaining to destination resorts. The assignments of error raised by Central Oregon La

OPINION Opinion by Justice LONGORIA. By thirteen issues, appellant Eric Christopher Gonzalez a/k/a Eric Christobal Gonzalez challenges his convictions for felony murder (Count I), aggravated assault (Count II), evading arrest (Count III), and possession of a controlled substance (marijuana) (Count IV). See Tex. Penal

282 S.W.3d 1 (2009) AMERICAN FIRST FEDERAL, INC., Respondent, v. BATTLEFIELD CENTER, L.P., et al., Appellants. No. ED 90672. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. January 20, 2009. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 10, 2009. Application for Transfer Denied May 26, 2009.

2005 UT 86 State of Utah, Plaintiff and Petitioner, v. Tomas G. Rojas-Martinez, Defendant and Respondent. No. 20030668. Supreme Court of Utah. FILED November 22, 2005. This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter. Mark L. Shurtleff, Att'y Gen., Christopher D. Ballard, Asst. Att'y Gen., Salt Lake City, for plai

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL CHRISTOPHER DÍAZ Apelación procedente del Apelada Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala v. Superior de Guaynabo

*43 OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. This case arises out of the sale of a portfolio company by one private equity firm to another. The portfolio company was Double E Parent LLC (“Double E” or the “Company”). The principal sellers were Prairie Capital, III, L.P. and Prairie Capital III

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the following: 1. Motion to Dismiss by Katherine Fernandez Rundle (DE 60); 2. Motion to Dismiss by Tomás Regalado (DE 61); 3. Motion to Dismiss by Robert Fielder (DE 62);</

12/16/2015 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS NOTICE OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS 12/16/2015 1:37:35 PM

*198 MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Tomas Lemus Amaya worked for six years as a kitchen hand at the Polio Granjero restaurant in Washington, D.C. In this suit, he seeks to recover from the restaurant and its owner unpaid minimum and ov

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PRAIRIE CAPITAL III, L.P., a Delaware ) limited partnership, on behalf of SELLERS ) OF DOUBLE E PARENT, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 10127-VCL ) DOUBLE E HOLDING CORP., a Delaware ) corporation,

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 5, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00826-CV TOMAS TINOCO, Appellant V. TROY CAPITAL, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas

Order filed February 11, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-20-00826-CV ___________ TOMAS TINOCO, Appellant V. TROY CAPITAL, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Tomas Alcides Ventura seeks to recover from a construction company and its owner unpaid overtime compensation for his work as a concrete installer. Despite having been served by first-class mail in accordance with the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs

Opinion PREMO, J. Respondent Susan E. Harris is the principal at Peterson Middle School (Peterson), which is part of the Santa Clara Unified School District. Appellant Christopher Stampolis, a board member of the school district, has a son who attends Peterson. In October 2014, Harris obtained a civil harassment restraining order (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.6) <