Cases

The opinion of the court was delivered by WECKER, J.A.D. Defendant, M.S., appeals from orders entered on July 10, 1998, and August 17,1998, and portions of an order entered on January 13,1999.1 This ease is an example of a tragic but recurring dilemma in certain family court cases involving allegations of child sexual abuse. On the one hand, there are clearly

MEMORANDUM ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Spirit Realty, L.P., formerly known as Cole Operating Partnership II, L.P. (“Spirit Realty”) moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(A) for expenses it incurred resulting from five disputes with defendant GH&H Mableton, LLC (“GH&H”) during the discovery phase of this action.1

Opinion BISHOP, J. In this personal injury action, the plaintiff, Zofia Mroczek, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a juiy verdict in favor of the defendant, Tadeusz Kret. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly barred her engineering expert from testifying that in his opinion, the area in which the plaintiff fell was unsafe.1

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Castern District DIVISION TWO GREGORY J. EVERS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ) No. ED107523 EVERS TRUST DATED 5/19/2016, ET AL., — ) ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Jefferson County vs. ) ) Honorable Mark T. Stoll CHRISTOPHER CHOATE AND JANET ) CHOATE, ) ) Appellants. ) FILED: November 19, 2019 Introduction Christopher and Janet Choate (the “Choates”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment establishing a road maintenance agreement in a residential subd

Opinion HEALEY, J. The pro se plaintiff, Richard A. Heim, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered subsequent to its granting of the motion to strike filed by the defendant Reiner, Reiner and Bendett, P.C., a Connecticut law firm.1 This action involves the circumstances and conduct of the parties, especially that of the defendant banks, First Nationwide Mor

Opinion KATZ, J. The issue in this appeal is the validity of an automobile insurance policy’s exclusion from uninsured motorist coverage for government owned vehicles when the insurance carrier that issued the government’s policy is insolvent. The substitute plaintiff, the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association *797(association),

DRONEY, Circuit Judge: On September 14, 2010, David H. Brooks was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Seybert, J.) after a jury trial on multiple counts of offenses relating to securities fraud, mail and wire fraud, and obstruction of justice. He was also convicted of related tax offenses based on his guilty pleas, which occurred after the jury’s verdict. Shortly before trial,

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions, Respondent, v. CDM Corporation, Inc. and Guardian Fiduciary Services, LLC, Petitioners. Appellate Case No. 2025-001557 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Georgetown County Joe M. Crosby, Master-in-Equity Opinion No. 28342 Heard May 20, 2026 – Filed July 15, 2026

ORDER RE COPYRIGHTABILITY OF CERTAIN REPLICATED ELEMENTS OF THE JAVA APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This action was the first of the so-called “smartphone war” cases tried to a jury. This order includes the findings of fact and conclusions of law on a central question tried simultaneously to the judge, namely the extent to which, if at all

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 12-DEC-2024 08:26 AM Dkt. 84 SO CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX (co

*365 Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. Cross-petitions for certification were granted in this matter to address issues related to the application of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA or Act), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -14, to so-called

976 F.Supp. 84 (1997) Susan ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants. Civ. Action No. 96-12267-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 3, 1997. Steven T. Sager, Marc Redlich, Law Offices of Marc Redlich, Boston, MA, Richard P. Goodkin, Framingham, MA, for Susan M. Rosenberg. Bar

952 A.2d 115 (2008) 109 Conn.App. 591 Christopher B. KENNEDY v. Leanna L. KENNEDY. Nos. 27274, 28217. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued March 17, 2008. Decided August 5, 2008. *117 Christopher B. Kennedy, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). Ira A. Jacobs, East Hartford, for the

995 A.2d 243 (2010) 2010 ME 45 STATE of Maine v. Duane Christopher WATERMAN. Docket: Oxf-09-417 Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: April 14, 2010. Decided: May 25, 2010. *246 John S. Jenness, Jr., Esq. (orally), South Paris, ME, for Duane Christopher Waterman. Janet T. Mills,

CUÉLLAR, J. *648 A jury convicted defendant Christopher Spencer of murdering James Madden. ( Pen. Code § 187 ; all further undesignated references are to this code.) It also found true the special circumstance allegations that Spencer murdered Madden while robbing him and burglarizing his pl

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On August 16, 2013, the Plaintiff Christopher Saldin filed this appeal of a decision dated August 25, 2011 pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “SSA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). That decision denied the Plaintiffs application for Social Security Disability (“SSD”) Benefits under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the SSA. On June

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOOGLE’S MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER THREE TO EXCLUDE PORTIONS OF DR. COCKBURN’S REVISED DAMAGES REPORT WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. INTRODUCTION In this patent and copyright infringement action involving Java and Android, defendant challenges plaintiffs revised expert damages report. For the following reasons, the motion is Granted in Part and

995 F.Supp. 190 (1998) Susan ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 96-12267-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 26, 1998. Steven T. Sager, Marc Redlich, Law Offices of Marc Redlich, Boston, MA, Richard P. Goodkin, Framingham, MA, for Susan M. Rosenberg. Barry Y.

PER CURIAM *1084By Order dated January 22, 2018, this Court announced that the Pennsylvania Congressional Redistricting Act of 2011, 25 P.S. §§ 3596.101 et seq . (the "2011 Plan"), clearly, plainly and palpably violates the Pennsylvania Constitution. This adjudication was based upon the uncontradicted evidentiary record developed

Cordy, J. Christopher Carleton is hearing impaired. He was denied employment as a fire fighter by the city of Marlborough (city) due to his inability to pass a hearing test based on standards promulgated by the Commonwealth’s division of human resources (division) at the direction of, and later approved by, the Legislature. See G. L. c. 31, § 61A. As a result, he commenced this action against the Commonwealth, the personnel admin