Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-98-00475-CV Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellant

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D16-3084 _____________________________ KEITH CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Appellant, v. RETIA KELLY and CHARLES P. JOHNSON, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. Michael S. Sharrit, Judge. August 7, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFF

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1436 CA 14-00242 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF ZACHARY JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GUTHRIE MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, INGRID STERLING, M.D., PRE-EMPTION FAMILY MEDICINE, J. MICHAEL BELL, M.D., P.C., CY

OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge; Defendant Christopher Johnson (“Johnson”) appeal’s his obstruction of justice conviction under 18 U.S.C, § 1512(b)(3). The basis for Johnson’s prosecution was his failure to include material 'information about the use of force upon an inmate in several reports documenting the encounte

KELLER, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which KEASLER, J. joined. Miriam Karr paid her rent by depositing a money order for $535 in the night drop at her apartment complex, but the apartment complex never .received the payment. It was later determined that the money order had been “washed” so that the names of the payee an

Case: 14-10049 Document: 00512995490 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 7, 2015 No. 14-10049

PER CURIAM. At issue in this premises liability case is whether a homeowner’s “don’t slip” statement to a mail carrier was adequate as a matter of law to warn him of an icy sidewalk. The trial court determined that it was and granted summary judgment to the homeowner defendants. The court of appeals reversed. Because we agree with the trial court, we reverse the court of appeals

ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge. Following a more than two-week trial in this contentious and expensive patent ease, the jury found for Defendant. During trial, one of Plaintiffs experts gave contradictory testimony, causing the Court to disallow it, a ruling which has now been affirmed on appeal. Post-trial it was found that one of Defendant’s expert witnesses also likely gave false tri

Affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Victoria A. Roberts, United States District Judge *805I. INTRODUCTION In this ballot access case, Christopher Graveline ("Graveline") and three of his supporters ("Plaintiff-Voters"; collectively "Plaintiffs") challenge three Michigan statutes which they say operate in combination to deprive them of substantial associational an

BISHOP, J. The plaintiffs, Mary Beth Farrell and Vincent Farrell, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a jury trial, in favor of the defendants Brian J. Hines, M.D., and Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, LLC (Urogynecology).

ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge. During the trial of this patent case, plaintiffs expert, Dr. Thomas Beebe, testified for the first time on cross-examination that he had followed an undocumented protocol for his Shore D testing that is entirely inconsistent with the procedures disclosed in his expert report. This caused defendant Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (“JJVC”)

MELANSON, Chief Judge. Christopher A. Pentico appeals from the district court’s order on intermediate appeal af&rming the magistrate’s summary dismissal of Pentico’s petition for post-conviction relief. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE Beginning in 2007, the Idaho Capitol

WILLHITE, J. *116After taking Motrin, an over-the-counter ibuprofen medication manufactured and sold by McNeil Consumer Healthcare (McNeil), plaintiff Christopher Trejo suffered a reaction in the form of a rare skin disease, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, and the more severe variant, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (collectively SJS/TEN).

OPINION ON REHEARING 1 Opinion on Rehearing by Justice PERKES. On May 29, 2014, we issued an opinion and judgments for these cause numbers. The State timely filed a motion for rehearing. After reviewing the motion and appellant’s response thereto, we grant the State’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opini

NAHMIAS, Justice. Appellant Stephen Randall Johnson challenges the trial court's order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to felony murder. Appellant claims that his plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because he was intoxicated when he entered it and that the trial court applied an erroneous standard of review in ruling on his motion. We affirm. 1. The record shows that after an initial indi

CRONE, Judge. Case Summary [1] Judi Simek brings an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of her motion to reconsider its previous denial of her motion to dismiss the claims filed against her by Christopher Nolan d/b/a Lakeside Farm, LLC, and William P. McCall, III (collectively “the Plaintiffs”). Specifically, Simek asserts that dismissal i

*992543 U. S. 1146; 543 U. S. 1187; *993No. 04-697. No. 04-796. No. 04-824. No. 04-826. No. 04-862. No. 0

*992543 U. S. 1146; 543 U. S. 1187; *993No. 04-697. No. 04-796. No. 04-824. No. 04-826. No. 04-862. No. 0