Cases

41 A.3d 664 (2012) 135 Conn.App. 232 In re CHRISTOPHER L.[*] No. 33803. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 31, 2012. Decided April 17, 2012.[**] *666 Eric H. Gaston, with whom was Alison Gaston, for the appellant (respondent mother). Stephen G. Vitelli, ass

Barnes, Presiding Judge. Following his conviction for two counts of armed robbery, hijacking a motor vehicle, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and two counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, Carltavieus Stephens appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial. On appeal, Stephens contends that the trial court erred in allowing the State to correct peremptory strikes it had previously made dur

Judgment rendered July 6, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,604-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** ALPHONSO B. WILLIAMS

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. SUMMARY Pending before this Court are four motions: Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike or Alternatively Sever the Third Party Complaint and Motion to Stay Filing of Responsive Pleading ("Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike") (ECF No. 28); Defendant's Motion to Stay ("Motion to Stay") (ECF No. 48); Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Declaration of Ale

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

PER CURIAM: We affirm the District Court’s judgment of September 23, 2013, granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss because, as the District Court stated, plaintiff failed to file a response contesting the motions. Doc. 10. AFFIRMED.

OPINION PORTLEY, Judge. ¶ 1 Petitioners, who are members of the broadcast and print media, challenge a ruling closing the penalty phase of a capital murder trial to the press, as well as to the public. *369As a result, we must decide whether a “clear and present danger” exists under Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure (“Rule”) 9.3 that justifies exc

*673 OWEN, Circuit Judge: The principal question in this appeal is the proper construction of the phrase “respecting the debtor’s ... financial condition” as it appears in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(2)(B). Because we agree with the bankruptcy court’s interpretation and find no clear error in that

[Cite as Lunar Lagoons, L.L.C. v. Stephens, 2025-Ohio-2389.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY LUNAR LAGOONS LLC, CASE NO. 10-24-11 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE v. GREG STEPHENS, OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY D

OPINION OF THE COURT SOYBEL, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of one specification of attempted carnal knowledge, one specification of attempted sodomy of a child, and one specification of committing an indecent act upon a female under the age of 16 years, in violation of Articles 80 and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 934. The appellant was charged with commit

OPINION PER CURIAM These are attempted appeals from orders signed February 24, 2015 and April 6, 2015. Because the orders do not dispose of all parties and all claims and because no statute provides for- an appeal from either of these interlocutory orders, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.,

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT GRANTED; COSTS IMPOSED COMBS, J.: 1 1 This cause is before the Court pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 0.8.2011, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, for consideration of Petitioner, Kathryn Hope Christopher's, September 18, 2013, petition for reinstatement to membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA). Petitioner was originally admitted to practice law in O

JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This is an interlocutory appeal from an order granting motions to dismiss by two defendants in a securities class action against Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Ji-angbo”), its principal officers, and its audit firm. The district court found that plaintiffs Christopher Brophy and Tara Lewis (collectively, the “investors”) failed to plead sufficiently

351 S.W.3d 381 (2011) STURGIS AIR ONE, L.L.C., Appellant, v. HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee. No. 14-09-00891-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). March 24, 2011. *382 Jayash M. Chadha, Andrius R. Kontrimas, Stephen A. Kuntz, Houston, for Appellant. Mario L. Dell'Osso, Houston, for Appellee.

OPINION Sharon McCally, Justice Garden Ridge, L.P. is a commercial tenant of Clear Lake Center, L.P. Garden Ridge sued Clear Lake Center for breach of the lease, claiming that Clear Lake Center overcharged common area maintenance (CAM) costs by including a fee paid to a third party for managing the entire property rather than just the common area.' In a

OPINION Tracy Christopher, Justice In this appeal from the judgment rendered after a bench trial in a legal-malpractice case, the appellant attorney Derrick M. Saulsberry argues, inter alia, that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the finding that he had a continuing attorney-client relationship with appellee Wendy Ross or t