Cases

</

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-245-CR CHRISTOPHER L. ADAMS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE -

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: This case arises from a dispute over attorney’s fees that were generated in an underlying bankruptcy case. Okin Adams & Kilmer L.L.P., (“OAK”) made a request for attorney’s fees in the bankruptcy court for the legal services it provided when representing debtors in Chapter 11 proceedings. The bankruptcy court awarded OAK only a portion of its overall attorney’s fees request. OAK appea

601 F.3d 1 (2010) Bernard L. ADAMS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Lee B. ADAMS, Defendant, Appellant. No. 09-1443. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 8, 2009. Decided March 31, 2010. *2 Christopher A. Duggan with whom H. Reed Witherby and Smith & Duggan LLP were on brief for appellant.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 21, 2024 No. 04-24-00394-CV Stephanie GONZALEZ, as Successor Councilmember of Converse to Jacqueline Angulo; Kassandra Leon, as Successor Councilmember of Converse to Nancy Droneburg; and Stacy L. Adams, Sr., as Successor Councilmember of Converse to Christopher L.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00394-CV Stephanie GONZALEZ, as Successor Councilmember of Converse to Jacqueline Angulo; Kassandra Leon, as Successor Councilmember of Converse to Nancy Droneburg; and Stacy L. Adams, Sr., as Successor Councilmember of Converse to Christopher L. Clark,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 11, 2004 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER L. WILLIAMS, COREY A. ADAMS, AND ORTEGA WILTZ Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2001-C-1673 Cheryl Blackburn, Judge No. M2003-00517-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 16, 2005 The appellants, Christopher

OPINION APPLIES TO BOTH ACTIONS DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge: Moving to dismiss Plaintiffs claims, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Defendants essentially maintain that Plaintiffs failed to state a plausible claim against them simply because Defendants are high-ranking supervising officials, and Plaintiffs’ facts lack the particulari

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4360 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOHN ADAMS, a/k/a L.J., a/k/a Little Johnny, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00547-RDB-11)

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of September 2016 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

257 P.3d 470 (2011) 2011 UT App 163 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Verbery ADAMS, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20090793-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. May 19, 2011. *471 Sherry Valdez and David P.S. Mack, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff and Christopher D. Ballard, Salt Lak

Reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Judges WILKINSON and MOTZ joined. PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: In 2013, Michael Anthony Dilworth was a pretrial detainee at North Carolina’s New Hanover County Detention Facility. While awaiting trial, Dilworth spent a total of 85 days in disci

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Judge. |2This is a suit by a bank on a promissory note, in which the district court granted the bank’s motion for summary judgment, finding that one of the guarantors of the note is liable for the amounts incurred, and granting attorney’s fees in amount of $10,000 to the bank. The defendant appeals and the bank answers the appeal. We affirm. FACTS On June 23, 200

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED February 8, 2024 CHRISTOPHER R. STILES, C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK Plaintiff Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: While being temporarily segregated in an attorney visitation booth, Norman F. Hicks, Sr., punched Harris County Detention Officer Christopher Pool in the face, prompting a responsive punch from Pool. As Hicks fell down, he struck his head on a concrete ledge in the booth. There were two other officers on the scene, one of whom looked throug

Prost, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Dewayne F. Adams et al. (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal from the order of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) granting the government’s partial motion to dismiss pursuant to Court of Federal Claims Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned

*587MEMORANDUM ** Bryan Pringle (“Plaintiff’) appeals the district court’s decision granting summary judgment to Defendants and its order of sanctions against Plaintiff under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Defendants cross-appeal the district court’s refusal to impose sanctions on Plaintiff and his counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurring. {¶ 47} I concur with the majority that the order appealed from is not a final, appealable order. However, I believe that the majority’s suggestion to the appellant, Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services (“agency”), that it file a motion for a final order of disposition under R.C. 2151.415(A) may be inadequate given the trial court’s past failures to adh

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-01041-COA MICHAEL L. ADAMS, JR. APPELLANT v. REBECCA TAYLOR ADAMS APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/08/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RHEA HUDSON SHELDON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAMAR COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR

OPINION MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice. On May 11, 2012, relator, USA Waste Management Resources, L.L.C., filed a pe *95 tition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex.R.App. P. 52. In the petition,