Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN, District Judge. These cases are before the Court on numerous motions for summary judgment (Docs. 422, 423, 424, 427, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436), a motion to dismiss a counterclaim (Doc. 400), a motion to disregard the deposition testimony of Dennis B. Griffin (Doc. 541), plaintiffs’ joint motion for leave to file a surreply (Doc. 553), and objectio

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Richard W. Berg v. Hon. Christopher J. Christie (A-71/72-14) (074612) Argued March 14, 2016 – Decided June

OPINION Marc. W. Brown, Justice Once again, this court considers whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion in which appellants—the Branch Law Firm L.L.P. and Turner Branch—sought to compel appellee W. Shane Osborn to arbitrate his claims. The Branch Parties relied upon an arbitration clause in a settlement agreement among a pharmaceutical company, participating claimants, and participa

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-29128-9, Deborah Fleck, J., entered November 9, 1995. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Ellington, J.

Matter of Judi B. (Osborn) (2025 NY Slip Op 03189) Matter of Judi B. (Osborn) 2025 NY Slip Op 03189 Decided on May 28, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

872 F.Supp. 679 (1994) Freda OSBORN, Plaintiff, v. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES INC., Defendant. No. 94-0598-CV-W-BC. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. December 13, 1994. *680 Christopher R. Williams, Kansas City, MO, for plaintiff. Frederick H. Riesmeyer, II, J. Dale Youngs, Spradley &

Affirmed and Opinion Filed January 27, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00153-CV AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Appellant V. CHRISTOPHER SHERWOOD A/K/A CHRISTOPHER J. SHERWOOD A/K/A CHRIS SHERWOOD, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-2131 LT Case No. 2022-CF-037124-A _____________________________ CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL OSBORNE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Samuel Bookhardt, III, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public

NEALON, J, Defendant, Progressive Insurance Company, has filed preliminary objections seeking to dismiss those claims which have been filed by plaintiff, Michael Olsofsky, charging Progressive with bad faith liability pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. §8371 and wanton misconduct under 75 Pa.C.S. §1797. Progressive contends that it cannot be held liable for punitive damages under 42 Pa.C.S. §8731 or treble damages under 75 Pa.C.S. §

DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 4, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00666-CR DEYLAN CHRISTOPHER WALKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0038-14 CHRISTOPHER ADRIAN MILLER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS TARRANT COUNTY H ERVEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

02/22/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 16, 2018 CHRISTOPHER JAKE REYNOLDS v. KEVIN GENOVESE ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hickman County No. 16-CV-28 Joseph Woodruff, Judge ___________________________________

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0270p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD37406 ) CHRISTOPHER BROCK MANUE

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A23-1259 Tax Court Moore, III, J. Took no part, Hennesy, J. Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators, vs. Filed: June 5, 2024

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM. McMillan, P.J., and Baschab and Wise, JJ., concur. Shaw, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: In exchange for the transfer of certain lands to be used for park purposes, the State agreed to permit the grantor the exclusive right, along with State vehicles, to operate his vehicles on the transferred land following vesting of title in the State. This exchange was the result of arm’s length negotiations between the parties, fundamental to the contract and which uniquely benefited the grantor

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed October 12, 2020 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00760-CR CHRISTOPHER DAMON HARRELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

The court delivered a PER CURIAM opinion, in which COLE, C.J., and BOGGS, BATCHELDER, MOORE, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, JJ„ joined, and CLAY, J. joined in the result. CLAY, J. (pp. 633-36), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. OPINION PER CURIAM. The federal statutes prohibiting the sa

USCA11 Case: 19-14597 Date Filed: 05/03/2022 Page: 1 of 21 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-14597 ____________________ OMNIPOL, A.S., a Private Limited Company, ELMEX PRAHA, A.S., a Private Limited Company,