Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Christopher Erick Axe”
Navelski v. International Paper Co.public domain
ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, CHIEF UNITED'STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on five motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, ECF No. 61; (2) Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony from *1284Tom Fruitticher, MAI, ECF No. 77; (3) Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony from Mark Ross, Ph.D., P.E., ECF
State of Tennessee v. Randy Clayton Normanpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RANDY CLAYTON NORMAN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 16988 Jim T. Hamilton, Judge No. M2009-01246-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 2, 2010 The defendant, Randy Clayton Norman, was convicted by a Maury County Circuit Court jury of
in Re Stephanie Riospublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-15-00557-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/4/2015 7:00:05
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
United States v. Burrpublic domain
MARSHALL, Chief Justice, remarked that it was not in the power of the marshal to summon more than twenty-four, as the act of assembly authorized1 only that number. If he should summon twenty-five, the last would not have power to act; and the marshal would have no power to displace any one of the others, to put-the last in his place. When the panel had been completed by the marshal, its deficiencies co