Cases

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: This matter came before the Court for a jury trial beginning on February 2, 2015. On February 27, 2015, the jury returned a unanimous verdict in Plaintiffs favor on claims of fraudulent conveyance, aiding and abetting fraudulent conveyance, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. The jury a

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. The Court and the parties in In re Refco Securities Litigation have hugely benefitted from the extraordinary services rendered by the Special Masters, Professor Daniel Capra of Fordham Law School and former United States Magistrate Judge Ronald Hedges. It is rare that this Court has found itself in disagreement with their procedural rulings

MEMORANDUM ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. On September 5, 2011, 2011 WL 4035819 Special Master Daniel J. Capra issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in the above-captioned cases on the omnibus issue of the applicability to plaintiffs’ claims of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”). Pub.L. No. 105-353, 112 Stat. 3227. After both the plaintiffs and defe

MEMORANDUM DECISION CHIN, District Judge. In this foreclosure action, defendant Board of Managers of the OTIC Professional Condominium (“OTIC”) seeks an order requiring the court-appointed receiver to pay the monthly condominium common charges that have accrued on the subject property during the period of receivership and as they become due in the future until the foreclosure sale. Plaintiffs R

KEARSE, Circuit Judge: The present appeal, brought by plaintiffs Kenneth M. Krys and Margot Macln-nis as, inter alia, Joint Official Liquidators of the SPhinX Ltd. family of hedge funds (“SPhinX” or “SPhinX Funds”), et al., challenges a partial final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Jed S.

*1122ORDER Stephen M. McNamee, Senior United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts 1 and 2 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint, which is fully briefed. (Docs. 12, 15, 16.) Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated the minimum wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). After reviewing all of the

696 F.Supp. 567 (1987) Robert E. ABNEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. William R. PATTEN, et al., Defendants. No. CIV-84-44-A. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. August 24, 1987. Richard R. Thomas, Christopher Lee and Alfred W. Ricciardi, Beus, Gilbert, Wake & Morrill, Phoenix, Ariz., J.R. Randy Baker, McKinney, Stringer & Webster, Oklahoma City, Okl., Mic

696 F.Supp. 570 (1987) Robert E. ABNEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. William R. PATTEN, et al., Defendants. No. CIV-84-44-A. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. October 2, 1987. Supplemental Opinion November 16, 1987. Second Supplemental Opinion April 19, 1988. *571 Richard R. Thomas, Christop

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE TERRELL P. FADELY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. ENCOMPASS HEALTH VALLEY OF THE SUN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 21-0478 FILED 6-28-2022 Appeal from the Superio

779 F.Supp.2d 372 (2011) In re REFCO SECURITIES LITIGATION. Kenneth M. Krys, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Christopher Sugrue, et al., Defendants. Kenneth M. Krys, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert Aaron, et al., Defendants. Kenneth M. Krys, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard Butt, Defendant. No. 07 MDL 1902(JSR). Nos. 08 Civ. 3065(JSR), 08 Civ. 3086(JSR), 08 Civ. 7416(JSR), 08 Civ. 8267(JSR). <

OPINION PER CURIAM. On September 4, 2013, relator Immobili-ere Jeuness Establissement filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex.R.App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Elaine Palmer, presiding judge of the 215th District

OPINION Sharon McCally, Justice In this legal malpractice case, a company asserts claims derivatively against the lawyers and law firm that represented two partnerships in which the company was a partner. The lawyers and law firm represented the partnerships pursuant to a written representation agreement, which contained a broad arbitration clause. After

622 F.3d 806 (2010) AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICROPLASTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-3764. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 21, 2010. Decided September 20, 2010. *807 Katherine Streicher Arnold, Attorney (argued), Tressler LLP, Chicago, IL, f

171 Ariz. 286 (1992) 830 P.2d 807 ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Marcia Weeks, Renz D. Jennings and Dale H. Morgan, as members of said Commission, Petitioners, v. STATE of Arizona ex rel. Grant WOODS, the Attorney General, Respondent, and The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, US West New Vector Group, Inc., Arizona Sierra Utility Company, First National Utilities, Inc., Be

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BARD IVC FILTERS No. 22-15872 PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, D.C. No. 2:15- md-02641-DGC ------------------------------ DORIS JONES; et al *, OPINION Plaintiffs, and LAW OFFICES OF BEN C.

570 F.Supp.2d 521 (2008) In re PARMALAT SECURITIES LITIGATION. This document relates to: 04 Civ. 0030. Master Docket No. 04 MD 1653 (LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 7, 2008. Catherine A. Torell, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Marlon Quintanilla Paz, Graham, Miller, Neandross, Mullin & Roonan, L.L.C., Michael Svetkey Feldber

182 Ariz. 586 (1995) 898 P.2d 964 GUST, ROSENFELD & HENDERSON, an Arizona partnership, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant/Appellant. No. CV-94-0098-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. June 22, 1995. *587 Beus, Gilbert & Morrill

943 P.2d 782 (1997) 189 Ariz. 422 MONTHOFER INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership; The E.M.W. Family Trust; Wolfgang Monthofer and Nancy J. Monthofer, husband and wife, Third-Party Plaintiffs/ Appellants, v. Mark R. ALLEN and Jane Doe Allen, husband and wife; Mark R. Allen, P.C., an Arizona professional corporation, Third-Party Defendants/ Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 93-0366.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER Gary L. Sharpe, Senior District Judge I. Introduction Following a three-day trial in July 2015, see Dkt. Nos. 359-65, a jury found that Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC willfully infringed PPC Broadband, Inc.’s (“PPC”) U,S. Patent No. 6,558,194 (“194 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,848,940 (“940 Patent”). (Dkt. No. 358.) Before trial, Corning

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket Nos. 46144 & 46147 FIRST SECURITY CORPORATION, an ) Idaho corporation, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v. ) Boise, August 2019 Term ) BELLE RANCH, LLC, an Idaho limited )