Cases

215 F.Supp.2d 1195 (2002) Lisa Y. JONES, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 01-2017-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 20, 2002. *1196 Steven D. Steinhilber, Charles H. McKenzie, Accurso Law Firm, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff. Christopher Allman, Office of United States Attorney, K

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Appellants brought claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), as well as various common-law claims including fraud, civil conspiracy, and breach of the employment contract, against their former employer Mobil Oil Corporation, based on Mobil’s 1984 amendment of its employee benefit plan and alleged failure to disclose to appella

418 F.Supp.2d 252 (2005) Tyneshia BROWN, Plaintiff v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 04-CV-6399-CJS. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 29, 2005. *253 Catherine M. Callery, Louise Tarantino, Rochester, NY, for Plaintiff. Kathleen Mehltretter, Acting United States Att

403 F.Supp.2d 239 (2005) Lewis IANNI, Plaintiff, v. Joanne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 02-CV-74A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 18, 2005. *240 *241 Toohey Clary & Bax, LLP (Dennis A. Clary, of Counsel), Lewiston, N

364 F.Supp.2d 1272 (2005) Kimberlin W. MCKITRICK, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 04-2377-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 12, 2005. *1273 Sharon J. Meyers, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff. Christopher Allman, Office of United States Attorney, Kans

356 F.Supp.2d 359 (2005) Lula M. HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Defendant. No. 00CIV.8689(RLE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 15, 2005. *360 Charles E. Binder, Binder & Binder, New York City. Lorraine S. Novinski, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorne

443 F.Supp.2d 411 (2006) Nettie RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 03-CV-6382L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. July 6, 2006. *412 *413 Gregory T. Phillips, Segar & Sciortino, Rochester, NY, for Plaintiff.

413 F.Supp.2d 199 (2006) Gilberto AGUDO-MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 05 CV 6125 CJS. United States District Court, W.D. New York. February 7, 2006. *200 *201 Richard A. Goldberg, Esq., Rochester, NY, for plaintiff. Kathleen

OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Charles Gayheart applied for Social Security disability insurance benefits (DIB) in December 2005 due to manifestations of anxiety, panic disorder, bipolar disorder, and depression. After an initial denial of his application and three separate hearings, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found that the limitations ca

291 F.Supp.2d 1290 (2003) A.J. TAFT COAL COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security; Michael H. Holland, et al., Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund, Defendants. No. CV 03-P-1390-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. November 14, 2003.

*1009 RILEY, Circuit Judge. Cathleen Raney (Raney) appeals the district court’s 1 decision upholding the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (Commissioner) denial of supplemental security income (SSI) benefits following a hear

PER CURIAM. The defendant, T.C. Crum Roofing and General Contractors, LLC, appeals a final judgment awarding damages to the plaintiff, Manuel Olvera-Casas. Finding no reversible error, we affirm as to the issues raised in the main appeal. On cross-appeal, the plaintiff argues, and the defendant concedes, that the trial court erred in denying the plaintif

344 F.3d 809 Paul Anderson, Jr., Appellant,v.Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee. No. 02-4119. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 14, 2003. Filed: September 29, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Ruth M. Carter, argued, Sioux City, IA (Roger L. Carter,

308 F.3d 876 Diane K. DOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-3910. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 14, 2002. Filed: October 21, 2002. Thomas A. Krause, argued, Des Moines, IA, for appellan

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Danny Depover applied for disability insurance benefits based on a back injury and related surgery, visual limitations, and high blood pressure. The Social Security Administration denied his application initially and on reconsideration. After holding a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that Mr. Depover was not disabled, an

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Naomi Tellez appeals the district court’s 1 order upholding the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Commissioner) denying supplemental security income (SSI) benefits following a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ), and a subsequent denial of review by the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SCHELL, District Judge. CAME ON TO BE HEARD this day defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. After considering the motion, the response in opposition, the reply to the response in opposition, the exhibits, and the affidavits, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be DENIED.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING (1) LEAD PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND APPROVAL OF PLAN ALLOCATION (ECF NO. 100) AND (2) LEAD PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION EXPENSES (ECF NO. 101) LINDA V. PARKER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE This class action lawsuit brought under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”) alleges misrepresentations an

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Green-Younger appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Christopher F. Droney, J.), accepting the recommended ruling of Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel to affirm the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denying Green-Younger’s application for social security disability benefits. O

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL COMPLAINT SCHELL, District Judge. CAME ON TO BE CONSIDERED Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Original Complaint. After reviewing the motion, the response in opposition, the reply to the response in opposition, the letters submitted by both sets of parties, and the pleadings of recor