Cases

PER CURIAM. In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and respondent have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). In the Agreement, respondent admits *567misc

ROBINSON, J. In this appeal, we consider whether a Workers' Compensation Commissioner may reinstate an employer or insurer as a party to proceedings pending on the asbestos docket of the Workers' Compensation Commission (commission) when the claim against that party was dismissed prior to a determination of the claimant's compensability or date of final exposure. The defendant Connecti

OPINION BY OLSON, J.: Appellants, Christopher Adams and, his wife, Margaret A. Adams appeal from the order entered on April 17, 2015, sustaining preliminary objections filed by Hellings Builders, Inc. (Hellings) and dismissing Appellants’ complaint. Upon careful review, we vacate the order and reinstate the complaint against Hellings.

73 P.3d 809 (2003) 2003 MT 186 Robert W. OLSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. James R. JUDE, Sallye Jude, Big Horn Properties, L.P., and Christopher Jude, Defendants and Respondents. No. 01-169. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs August 30, 2001. Decided July 15, 2003. *810 Lisa A

Opinion by Judge ROMAN. In this probate proceeding, petitioners, Nancy Olson and Joyce Hill, appeal the district court order denying their petition to vacate an order of intestacy requested by the personal representative, Alice Nugent, in favor of the heirs, Laurel Evarts, David Evarts, and Eileen Fayle. Eileen Fayle, an heir and the mother of petitioners, does not participate in this appeal. We vacate the or

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff, as executor of his father’s will, commenced this wrongful death action after his father (decedent) was fatally injured by a bull while hunting on defendant’s dairy farm. Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to General Obligations Law § 9-103 (1) (a). Defenda

Toal, Justice: This appeal arises from the trial court’s retroactive application of Bailey v. The State of South Carolina, — S.C. —, 424 S.E. (2d) 503 (1992), to award attorney fees in excess of the State’s statutory fee obligation for death penalty defense. We reverse. FACTS Christopher Olson was appointed in July 1991 to defend Larry Eugene Hall for a murder trial in which the St

*869MEMORANDUM * Defendant David Keith Olson (“Olson”) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) decision reversing the bankruptcy court’s discovery sanction excluding all Plaintiffs’ exhibits, expert testimony, and evidence of damages, and dismissing Plaintiffs’ adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction and we affirm. The dis

121 B.R. 346 (1990) In re Stanley N. OLSON and Margaret M. Olson, Debtors. Edward F. SAMORE, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley N. OLSON, Margaret M. Olson, Winther, Stave and Company, Merlyn Winther, Defendants-Appellants, and Internal Revenue Service and Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance, Defendants-Appellees. No. C 89-4078. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, W.D.<

OPINION BY BOWES, J.: C.S. appeals from the dispositional order entered in this matter following her adjudication of delinquency for acts constituting a violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 3701(a)(l)(v), robbery-force however slight and theft. We affirm. The juvenile court delineated the salient facts as follows. On September 10, 2011, Cornelius McMullen (McMullen) was w

OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: B.A.S., Jr. (Father), appeals from the order entered December 15, 2016, in the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County, which terminated involuntarily his parental rights to his minor son, C.A.S. (Child). We vacate and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We summarize the relevant

668 A.2d 1355 (1995) Robert BRZOSKA and Mary Ann Brzoska, his wife, et al., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Edward P. OLSON, Administrator of the Estate of Raymond P. Owens, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 284, 1994. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 25, 1995. Decided: September 8, 1995. Marla Rosoff Eskin (argued), and Thomas C. Crumplar, J

Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In 1997, with enactment of Chapter 113 of the Laws of New Jersey, the Legislature granted to members of the public pension funds a “non-forfeitable right to receive benefits,” a right defined to mean that benefits could not be reduced once the right to them had attached. See N.J.S.A. 43:

Filed 1/17/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX MARK OLSON, 2d Civ. No. B324465 (Super. Ct. No. 20CV02207) Plaintiff and Appellant, (Santa Barbara County) v. PATRICK SAVILLE, Defendant and Respondent. In this personal injury case, we hold the doctrin

[Cite as State v. Olson-Graf, 2024-Ohio-2291.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 29988 : v.

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1530 OPINION This appeal arises out of an action by plaintiff San Jose Construction, Inc. (SJC) against its former employee, Richard Foust, and Foust's new employer, S.B.C.C., Inc., doing business as South Bay Construction Company (South Bay). The trial court granted a motion by South Bay for su

100 B.R. 458 (1989) In re Stanley N. OLSON and Margaret M. Olson, Debtors. Edward F. SAMORE, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Stanley N. OLSON; Margaret M. Olson; Winther, Stave & Company; Merlyn Winther; Internal Revenue Service and Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 85-02333S, Adv. No. X88-0127S. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa, W.D. Ap

PER CURIAM. Mozelle Olson (Mozelle) appeals from judgments entered in the estate of her late husband, A.J. Olson (A.J.). On appeal, she raises a variety of issues. We hold that the first of the judgments she here appeals from was final and should have been appealed from some years ago. Accordingly, we dismiss that part of her appeal arising from that judgment. We are unpersuaded by her remaining issues and affirm the other judgme

PER CURIAM. Stanley N. and Margaret M. Olson, debtors in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case, and their accountants, Winther, Stave & Company, appeal a judgment of the district court,1 affirming an order of the bankruptcy court,2 which held that property abandoned by the trustee during the pendency of a bankruptcy case is not a sale or exchange of assets which gives ris