Cases

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Attorney Christopher C. Myers contends that the district court lacked the authority to assess jury costs against him once his client was unable to pay those costs within the time frame established by the lower court. Yet as we will explain, Myers waived this challenge to the court’s authority by failing to raise any objection to the assessment

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 19 2020, 8:31 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

TYSON, Judge. *725 Stanley and Ruby Clodfelter ("Defendants") appeal from the trial court's grant of a perpetual prescriptive easement in favor of Jack L. Myers and Anna Bianca Coe ("Plaintiffs"). We affirm. I. Background Coe Road inter

Eleanor L. Ross, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 18] and the United States of America's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 23]. I. Background A. Procedural History and Facts Plaintiff Steven J. Myers filed the instant complaint1 asking the Court

J-S22022-23 2023 PA Super 127 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : CHRISTOPHER JAMES MYERS : : Appellant

PER CURIAM: Christopher Gill pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon, .18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and was sentenced to 80 months in prison followed by three years supervised release. That sentence was within his guidelines range. He contends that the district court erred in calculating his guidelines range because, according to Gill, the government failed to show that h

BROWN, Circuit Judge, concurring: I join Parts I, II-A and II-B of the opinion. I write separately because I believe special factors foreclose plaintiffs from bringing a Bivens action and because I disagree that the term “person” limits the scope of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”). I Under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau o

MEMORANDUM** Oregon state prisoner Peter Franks appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition, challenging his conviction for burglary in the first degree and robbery in the third degree. Reviewing de novo the district court’s decision to deny Franks’ habeas petition, Himes v. Thompson, 336 F.3d 848, 852 (9th Cir.2003), and applying standards set forth by the Antite

Myers, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant 11320 Chester LLC ("Chester") has appealed from the trial court's entry granting judgment in the amount of $13,626.14 to plaintiff-appellee The Murphy Elevator Company ("Murphy") on Murphy's claim for breach of contract. {¶ 2} Because the trial court used the wrong measure of damages when calculating the damages owe

*129STARCHER, Justice, dissenting. (Filed June 25, 2004) I agree with the principles of statutory construction that are recited by the majority opinion. But I disagree with their application in the instant case. “Strict construction” of a statute means that if there is any plausible reading of the statute that goes ag

628 S.E.2d 761 (2006) 360 N.C. 460 Gail M. MYERS, Ancillary Administratrix of the Estate of Darryl Myers, Plaintiff v. Shirley McGRADY, Thomas W. Higgins, Michael P. Murphy, James F. Foust, William A. Spencer, Jr., and Verian Ladson, Successor Representative for the Estate of J.C. Myers, Jr., Defendants, and Shirley McGrady, Thomas W. Higgins, James F. Foust, William A. Spencer, Jr., and Verian Ladson, Successor Repres

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of September 2005 by Plaintiff (Gail M. Myers) for Extension of Time to File Brief:"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Gall M. Myers) shall have up to and including the 21st day of November 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court In conference this the 4th day of October 2005."

293 F.Supp.2d 845 (2003) Lisa WHISBY-MYERS, Christopher Myers, for themselves as next friends of Kenny Whisby, Kenshell Whisby, and Christian Myers, Plaintiffs, v. Robert KIEKENAPP, Defendant. No. 03 C 2909. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 26, 2003. *846 *847</

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30159 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cr-00045-JLQ-1 CHRISTOPHER RAY MYERS, AKA Christopher Myers, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Third-Party Defendant on the 12th day of July 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

OPINION and ORDER Judge James T. Moody, United States District Judge Plaintiff Newton Arnold alleges violations of his civil rights arising out of a traffic stop which culminated in the seizure of more than $11,000 in cash. (DE # 12.) He brings this case against defendant police officers Mark Brown, John Drummer, and Sonia Atienzo as well as the City of Fort Wayne. Defendants have moved for summary jud

Hamilton, Circuit Judge. Anthony Gant brought this action against three police officers and the City of Fort Wayne for injuries he sustained as he fled from an armed robbery. Gant's operative First Amended Complaint alleges several constitutional violations and seeks damages under 42

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Encompass Indemnity Company ("Encompass"), appeals the decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas to grant summary judgment on an insurance-coverage issue to plaintiff-appellee, Robert Douglas Myers. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause for the reasons outlined below. {¶ 2} Appellee incurred damage at his home when water entered his basement after a series of events occurred both off and on his pr

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG. This appeal arises from a default judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of appellee Duffy McKenzie against appellants Christopher Utz; Evans Environmental Contracting, L.L.C.; Utz Environmental Services of Dallas, L.L.C.; and Utz Environmental Services of Austin, Inc. Appellants filed a motio

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. When a law enforcement officer makes a warrantless arrest, the Fourth Amendment entitles the arrestee to a prompt probable cause hearing before a judge or magistrate. Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 113-14, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975). According to the Supreme Court, “prompt” in this context means, under most circumstances