Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00776-CR Christopher BUSTOS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appelle

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-23-00776-CR Christopher BUSTOS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From

646 F.3d 762 (2011) Jerry Lee BUSTOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A & E TELEVISION NETWORKS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-1253. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 19, 2011. Paul J. Kyed (Buck S. Beltzer, Christopher L. Larson, and J. Kevin Bridston with him on the briefs), Holland & Hart, LLP, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Steven D.

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

2020 IL App (2d) 170497 No. 2-17-0497 Opinion filed October 29, 2020 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STA

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion on Remand filed May 29, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00625-CR NICOLAS BUSTOS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial

RECEIVED IN l^/Z^ZT^ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS _ FILED IN JAN 02 2?i5 10: Cour^&ffainQlippftats 14th COURT OFAPPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS Abehftcosm ^lerk- aLTmi DEC 17 20W Al CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Affirmed as Reformed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 21, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00625-CR NICOLAS BUSTOS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial C

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 10, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00140-CR CASIMIRO BUSTOS SANDOVAL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 248th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause

Matter of Teresa S. v Christopher H. (2024 NY Slip Op 06050) Matter of Teresa S. v Christopher H. 2024 NY Slip Op 06050 Decided on December 4, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 1/28/2015 11:06:40 AM INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1511 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Christopher Ronald Martin lllll

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit July 19, 2011 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UN

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1511 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Christopher Ronald Martin lllll

SAM R. CUMMINGS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered: (1) Defendant Jacob Wiebe Teichroeb, Individually, d/b/a Seminole Metal's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), filed July 11, 2018; and (2) Plaintiff Laura Andrade's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed July 30, 2018.

113 S.W.3d 471 (2003) Kody KOTHMANN, Appellant, v. Clint COOK, Appellee. No. 07-02-0138-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. June 27, 2003. Rehearing Overruled September 9, 2003. *472 Christopher Carver, Lubbock, for Appellant. Fernando M. Bustos, McCleskey Harriger Brazil & Graf, L.L.P., Lubbock,

504 F.3d 1130 (2007) SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Thomas F. Lennon, as appointed receiver for Alpha Telcom, Inc.; an Oregon Corporation; American Telecommunication Company, Inc., a Nevada Corporation; Strategic Partnership Alliance, LLC.; a Nevada Limited Liability Company; SPA Marketing, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Receiver-Appellee, v. Priscilla ROSS; Kevin M. Rimple; Bruce F. Ruark; Dennis L. Bau

PER CURIAM. Because (a) the attorney’s fee, which was previously awarded by the trial court to the two law firms representing the plaintiffs in the underlying class action amounting to 25% of the $9,200,000 settlement obtained, was contingent upon the plaintiffs prevailing in the action and was therefore a “contingency fee,” within the meaning of the fee-sharing agreement between the two law firms, and (b) there was substant

913 F.Supp. 559 (1995) EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a California Nonprofit Corporation; Todd Steiner; The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, a New York Nonprofit Corporation; and The Humane Society of the United States, a Delaware Nonprofit Corporation, The Sierra Club, a California Nonprofit Corporation; and The Georgia Fishermen's Association, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Warren CHRISTOPHER, Secretary of State;

Matter of Bell v Bell (2025 NY Slip Op 05078) Matter of Bell v Bell 2025 NY Slip Op 05078 Decided on September 24, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opi