Cases

303 F.Supp.2d 815 (2003) Christine PETTY; et al. Plaintiffs v. GULF GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al. Defendants No. 1:03 CV, 5-D-D. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division. August 22, 2003. *816 Eric D. Bonner, Mann Cowan & Potter, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs. Mark Herndon Tyson, McGlin

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY CURDALE BLEDMAN, Defendant-Below/Appellant, Case No. CPU4-22-000379 V. CONWELL PETTY, Nee Ne ee ee ee ee Ne ee” ee” Plaintiff-Below/Appellee. Submitted: September 21, 2022 Decided: October 31, 2022 Curdale Bledman Conwell Petty 45 Fairway Road 50 Buttonwood Ave Newark, DE 19711 New Castle, DE 19790 Pro Se Pro Se DECISION AFTER TRIAL Surles, J. This is an appeal de novo brought under 10 Del. C. § 9570

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1766 Doc: 36 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 27 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1766 MARIE LAURENT-WORKMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary, United States Department of the Army,

PER CURIAM. | tThis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges- filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Christine M. Mire, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana. UNDERLYING FACTS Count I — The Keaty Matter By way of background, Judge Phyllis Keaty presided over family law matters in the 15th Judicial Di

OPINION OF THE COURT Pigott, J. The issue on this appeal is whether a defendant who pleaded guilty to a felony may waive his or her right to be present at sentencing. We hold that such a waiver is permissible under the circumstances herein. *487 After comm

[J-49-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BAER, C.J., TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. DONNA DAVIS JAVITZ, : No. 85 MAP 2021 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court

JEFFREY W. BATES, J. OPINION AUTHOR Paul Teaver (Teaver) appeals from an order denying his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. 1 Teaver contends the motion court clearly erred in denying relief, without an evidentiary hearing, on Teaver’s claim that

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 10, 2002 Decided June 14, 2002 No. 01-5010 Christine A. Lozowski, Appellee v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of Transportation, Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG. GINSBURG, Chief Judge: An officer of the Coast Guard claims that the service treated her unjustly and discriminated against her based upon her gender when it assigned her to a ship in Key West, Florida. The Secretary of Transportation, to whom the officer applied for a correction of her military record

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. While I concur in the affirmance of the district court, I would follow a different course of reasoning. Specifically, although I agree that Charter One, as a unique statutory creation with distinct sources of funding, is not similarly situated to other schools located in the RUSD (and thus may be subject to disparate treatmen

Opinion MARGULIES, Acting P. J. Plaintiff Patrick Scott (Scott) owned and operated vehicle service stations for over 40 years, during which he was periodically exposed to asbestos from brake and clutch repair. He eventually developed mesothelioma, a form of cancer uniquely linked to asbestos

[Cite as State v. Bagner, 2020-Ohio-5113.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-19-1158 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201901599 v. Byron Andrew Bagner, Jr. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00516-CV State of Texas, Appellant v. <

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00516-CV State of Texas, Appellant v. Joe L. Ware and the Estate of Christine Ware , Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 97-09229, HONORABLE WILLIAM E. BENDER, JUDGE PRESIDING

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania : : v. : No. 473 C.D. 2020 : Submitted: October 11, 2023 Frederick W. Karash, : Appellant : BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER, President Judge HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. Christine K. Schroeder, the plaintiff-appellant, brought this diversity suit 1 against Lufthansa German Airlines and unknown employees of Lufthansa (collectively “Lufthansa”), the defendants-appellees, under the Warsaw Convention for injuries sustained while she was a passenger on Lufthan

MARY'S OPINION HEADING NO. 12-02-00041-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

[Cite as State v. Chears, 2022-Ohio-861.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals Nos. WD-21-026 WD-21-028 Appellee Trial Court No. 2020CR0401 v. Felicia A. Chears

WICKER, Judge. This appeal arises from a claim for worker’s compensation filed by the wife and child of the decedent, Craig Burlin (Craig), against Craig’s employer, C.D. Montz & Company, Inc. (Montz) and its insurer, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (State Farm). Christine Burlin (Christine), the widow, and Nicole Burlin, the minor child,1 seek death benefits for Craig’s death which

GARLAND, Circuit Judge: In this case we consider the validity of a district court order, preliminarily enjoining approval by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) of a generic drug, that was issued at the behest of the manufacturer of the competing brand-name drug. We previously stayed the preliminary injunction pending our resolution of this appeal. Because we find plainti