Cases

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is Louisiana Legislature’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (Doc. 100), filed by Defendants the Louisiana House of Representatives and the Louisiana Senate (collectively the “Legislature”), seeking an order from this Court dismissing Plaintiff Kenneth Hall’s (“Hall”) claims, pursuant to Federal Rules of

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a FRCP 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss City Court of Baton Rouge (Doc. 55), filed'by Defendants the City of Baton Rouge and the Parish of East Baton Rouge (collectively the “City/Parish”), seeking an order from this Court dismissing Plaintiff Kenneth Hall’s (“Hall”) claims against Defendant the City Court of Baton Rouge.1

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a Motion on Behalf of the State of Louisiana, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal and Louisiana Attorney General James D. “Buddy” Caldwell to Dismiss Complaint, First Amending and Supplemental Complaint and Request for Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Injunction (Doc. 39), filed by Defendants the State of Louisiana, Governor Piyush Jindal

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 99), filed by Defendants Judge Laura Davis, Judge Suzan Ponder, and Judge Alex Wall (the “Defendant-Judges”), seeking an order from this Court dismissing Plaintiff Kenneth Hall’s (“Hall”) claims against them, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 Hall op

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff Kenneth Hall’s Application for a Three-Judge Court (Doc. 71), requesting this Court to petition the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to empanel a three-judge court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284, to hear Plaintiffs claims under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The motion is unoppo

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On June 23, 2015, Todd Hall and Dan Rivera (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed this action individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals in Los Angeles Superior Court against Live Nation Worldwide, Inc (“Live Nation”).1 Live Nation

RULING AND ORDER BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Complaint, First Amending and Supplemental Complaint, and Request for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (Doc. 40), filed by Defendant Tom Schedler (“Schedler”), seeking an order from this Court dismissing Plaintiffs Kenneth Hall’s (“Hall”) claims against him, purs

RULING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 158) JANET C. HALL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Gary L. Tatum (“Tatum”), brings this lawsuit against defendants Mary Christina Oberg (“Oberg”) and the law firm, Ford, Oberg, Manion and Houck, P.C. (“FOMH”), alleging breach of contract and legal malpractice. Oberg, an attorney at FOMH, previously represented Tatum in an

RULING, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (“VRA”) and the VRA amendments of 1982, 52 U.S.C. § 10301 (previously codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1973), the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1986.1 Plaintiff Kenneth Hall an

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 8, 2007 Session CHRISTINA ALTICE v. NATS, INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 04-678-I (III) Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor No. M2007-00212-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 15, 2008 Plaintiff sued defendants to collect

William J. Martínez, United States District Judge Plaintiff Dr. James Brill ("Brill") brings this civil rights action against Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Physicians, P.C. (together, "CCS Defendants"), and Carl Anderson and C. Gregory Tiemeier in their individual capacities ("Anderson" and "Tiemeier"), alleging that they violated his constitutional rights by terminatin

650 F.Supp.2d 185 (2009) Gary L. TATUM, Plaintiff, v. Mary Christina OBERG, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1251 (JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 3, 2009. *188 Joseph N. DeFilippo, DeFilippo & Russo LLC, Shelton, CT, Tracey Lane Russo, Morrison, Mahoney LLP, Hartford, CT, for Plainti

OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J. In this nursing home negligence action, judgment in the amount of $154,902.98 was entered in favor of June Hall, as Adminis-tratrix of the Estate of Sallie Mae Hall, deceased, (collectively “the Estate”) after the jury awarded compensatory damages for the injuries the deceased suffered as a result of neglect while she was a resident at the Philadelphia Nursing Home (hereinafter nursing

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES Nos. 23-35543 OF THE FORT HALL 23-35544 RESERVATION, D.C. No. 4:20-cv- Plaintiff-Appellee, 00553-BLW v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE OPINION INTERIOR; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; LAURA DANIEL- DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assista

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jul 10 2018, 7:57 am court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

PER CURIAM. On June 30, 1998, Christina Riggs was convicted in Pulaski County Circuit Court of capital murder and was sentenced to death by lethal injection. On November 4, 1999, this court affirmed her conviction. Riggs v. State, 339 Ark. 111, 3 S.W.3d 305 (1999). On December 20, 1999, a hearing was held in Pulaski County Circuit Court pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.5. At

ROBERT L. Brown, Justice. Appellant Christina Marie Riggs appeals ce. judgment of conviction for the capital murder of her two children, Justin Thomas (age 5) and Shelby Riggs (age 2). She raises four points on appeal relating to the guilt phase of her trial: (1) that her statement to police was involuntary and her waiver of Miranda rights was also involuntary, unknowing, and unintelligendy made due to her

601 F.Supp.2d 865 (2009) Nicolas Leandro MARTINEZ, Individually, and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Gloria Martinez, Deceased; Christina Marie Ortiz; Carmen Rachel Ortiz; and Miguel Antonio Ortiz v. Cesar H. PORTA, M.D.; Ramasamy Selvaraj, M.D.; Scott Williamson, M.D.; and United Regional Health Care System, Inc., d/b/a United Regional Health Care System. Action No. 4:03-CV-915-Y.

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED. Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues. Plaintiff Scott Sieber challenges the grant of summary judgment dismissing his claim of employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Righ

JUSTICE BILANDIC delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Madison County, defendant, Felipe Hall, was convicted of two counts of first degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9 — 1(a)(1) (West 1994)). The same jury found that defendant was eligible for the death penalty and that there wer