Cases

PER CURIAM. In light of the father’s statements at the trial in this paternity action, we affirm the child support award without prejudice for the father to seek a reduction when the timesharing between the parents reaches 50/50. GROSS, DAMOORGIAN, JJ„ and HERSCH, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CALVIN ROBINSON, Appellant, v. CHRISTINA MCDONALD, Appellee. No. 4D14-204 [August 26, 2015] Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Pa

Matter of McFadden v McDonald (2022 NY Slip Op 02265) Matter of McFadden v McDonald 2022 NY Slip Op 02265 Decided on April 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

MEMORANDUM ** Jinlin Ling, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo quéstions of law, including cla

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01225-SCT MARIA E. THOMPSON v. DENNIS L. HOLLIMAN AND ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/27/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAWRENCE PAUL BOURGEOIS, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: SUSAN CHRISTINA DEHGHANI-SANICH MICHAEL SCOTT BISHOP

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 04-OCT-2018 04:42 PM SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX SUP

MULLINS, J. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the petitioner, Angel Meletrich, has demonstrated that his criminal trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to present the testimony of a second alibi witness to support his defense. The petitioner appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court dismissing his appeal from the judgment of the habeas court, which

Ditech Fin., LLC v Naidu (2021 NY Slip Op 05320) Ditech Fin., LLC v Naidu 2021 NY Slip Op 05320 Decided on October 6, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

679 F.Supp.2d 787 (2010) Maria O. NARANJO, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL SURETY OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. C-09-240. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. January 14, 2010. *789 Ahmad Keshavarz, The Law Offices of Ahmad Keshavarz, Brooklyn, NY, Christina E. Trejo, Texas Rio Grand Legal

OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), (Doc. 19), and Defendants’ unopposed Motion for Judicial Notice, (Doc. 22). For the reasons stated below Defendants’ Motion for Judicial Notice is GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillips and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Phillips and enters the following Opinion and Award:

631 F.3d 685 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria Aide DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-41041. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 19, 2011. *689 James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Houston, TX, for U.S. Marjorie A. Meyers, Fed. Pub. Def., Timothy William Crooks and

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This matter is pending for consideration of Defendants Bosch Rexroth Corporation (“Bosch”), Dan Reynolds, Geoff O’Nan, and Valenda Allen’s motion for summary judgment. [Record No. 49] For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in its entirety. I. Plaintiff LaShaunna Banks worked as an assembl

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1845 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA; A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE; UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE; COMMON CAUSE NORTH CAROLINA; GOLDIE WELLS; KAY BRANDON; OCTAVIA RAINEY; SARA STOHLER; HUGH STOHLER, Plaintiffs, and LOUIS M. DUKE; CHARLES M. GRAY; ASGOD BARRANTES; JOSUE E. BERDUO; BRIA

BEACH, J. The petitioner, Angel Meletrich, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal and erred in not finding that his trial counsel provided

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

[Cite as State v. Kingery, 2012-Ohio-505.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 24063 v. : T.C. NO. 09CRB11732 CHRISTINA KINGERY : (Criminal appeal from Municipal Cour

IN RE AMIAS I. ET AL.* (SC 20671) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus The respondent mother appealed from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor children, N, M, and D. The petitioner, the Commissioner of Children and Families, filed petitions to terminate the respondent

DATE: 07/17/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:31:12 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312017 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

DATE: 03/16/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 08:44:17 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312015 GROUP 2 _____________________________________________________________________________