Cases

Dyk, Circuit Judge. Power Integrations, Inc. owns U.S. Patent Nos. 6,212,079 ("the '079 patent") and 6,538,908 ("the '908 patent"). Power Integrations sued Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation (collectively "Fairchild") for infringement. A jury found Fairchild literally infringed claims 31, 34, 38, and 42 of the '079 patent and infringed claims 26 and 2

Dyk, Circuit Judge. *969Power Integrations, Inc. owns U.S. Patent Nos. 6,212,079 ("the '079 patent") and 6,538,908 ("the '908 patent"). Power Integrations sued Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation (collectively "Fairchild") for infringement. A jury found Fairchild literally infringed claims 31, 34, 38, and 42 o

Matter of Messiah RR. (Christina RR.) (2021 NY Slip Op 00066) Matter of Messiah RR. (Christina RR.) 2021 NY Slip Op 00066 Decided on January 7, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law R

Matter of Karen Q. v Christina R. (2020 NY Slip Op 03442) Matter of Karen Q. v Christina R. 2020 NY Slip Op 03442 Decided on June 18, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

07/08/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2018 CHRISTINA KLEPPER NEELY v. BRIAN RICHARD NEELY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sullivan County No. C0016966C E. G. Moody, Chancellor _________________

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0275p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ CHRISTINA LITTLER, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Kootenai County from a judgment holding that the defendants were not violating the subdivision CC & R’s by operating a bed and breakfast from their home or by having arborvitaes higher than six feet, and awarding them a judgment totaling $168,755.37 against the plaintiff for her conduct that caused them emotional distress. We affirm

OPINION Frank G. Clement, Jr., P.J., M.S., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Andy D. Bennett and Richard H. Dinkins, JJ., joined. In this divorce action, the wife appeals, contending the trial court erred in calculating her child support obligation by failing to impute income to the husband and

Opinion KATZ, J. The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether parents who are respondents to a termination of parental rights petition have standing to assert the constitutional rights of their children who are the subject of the termination action. Specifically, we must consider whether parents have standing to assert a claim that their children were denied their constitutional right to

711 F.Supp.2d 279 (2010) Daniel SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, v. Paul CHAPPIUS, Superintendent Napoli In their Individual Capacities, Defendants. No. 09-CV-6178L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 4, 2010. *280 Christina A. Agola, Rochester, NY, for Plaintiff. J. Richard Benitez, NYS Attorney General's Office, Roches

Michael F. Urbanski, Chief United States District Judge When Defendant David Neaves started his employment with Plaintiff O'Sullivan Films, Inc. ("O'Sullivan"), he agreed to a limited noncompete agreement (the "Noncompete") with O'Sullivan. Neaves concedes that he has willfully violated the terms of the Noncompete, but insists that the Noncompete is invalid under Virginia law. O'Sullivan disagrees and asks the court to enforce the N

Opinion PETERS, J. Cases involving the termination of parental rights are always difficult. This case highlights that difficulty because, as the trial court found, “the children love their parents and . . . the parents love the children.” It also found, however, that “unfortunately, [the] *567mother and father cannot or will not make the cha

JUDGE CUFF (temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal presents a narrow issue of appellate jurisdiction of an agency decision and the appropriate response by an appellate tribunal when it encounters on its calendar an interlocutory order from which leave to appeal was neither sought nor granted. The appeal arises in the context of a

OPINION Relators, P.I.A. of Fort Worth, Inc. d/b/a Psychiatric Institute of Fort Worth, Hernan E. Burgos, M.D., Virgil M. Cox, M.D., M. Basheer Ahmed, M.D., and Jagan S. Reddy, M.D., seek the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Frank Sullivan, Judge of the 322nd Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, to comply with the provisions of TEX.R.CIV.P. 329b by vacating the Order to Seal Records entered in Cause No. 322-112279; In the Matter of the

Justice KAGAN delivered the opinion of the Court. * *1723 To help staunch a "flood of nonmeritorious" prisoner litigation, the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) established what has become known as the three-strikes rule

FILED May 30 2025, 10:02 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Christina Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of the City of Elizabeth (A-28-14) (074974) Argued October 27, 2015 --

623 F.3d 770 (2010) Christina SULLIVAN, a single person, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., a Virginia corporation, doing business in Washington, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-35413. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 2010. Filed September 27, 2010. *774 Janet

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JUDGE *476The father, M.S.F., appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis terminating his parental rights to his six-year-old child, F.L.M., and later granting the petition of the guardians, K.F. and L.F., to adopt the child.1 We find that the record contains no cle

ORDER PER CURIAM. Bryan McCarty appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding certain property deemed marital property to Lisa McCarty, n/k/a Lisa Cole. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum