Cases

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge GINSBURG. GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge: When Christina Conyers Williams, an employee in the D.C. Department of Health, Addiction Prevention and Recovery Administration (APRA), testified before the D.C. Council, she revealed that her department’s new software program to keep track of client data was not c

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0705-11

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON MAY 20, 2009 Session ELISHEA D. FISHER v. CHRISTINA M. JOHNSON Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Weakley County No. 4200 William B. Acree, Jr., Judge No. W2008-02165-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 24, 2009 This is a personal injury suit arising out of an automobile accident.

BERGER, Judge. *824 Kristy Humphrey Johnson ("Defendant") appeals from an order entered on December 14, 2016 denying her motion to set aside a separation agreement executed by the parties on May 19, 2015. Defendant argues the trial court erred because the separation agreement (1) lacks consi

Dismissed.

CIKLIN, J. The plaintiff appeals an order which effectively determined that it was not entitled to attorneys’ fees following the non-jury trial conducted in this matter. Because the record does not reflect an abuse of discretion by the trial court, we affirm. The plaintiffs suit against the defendants related to an unpaid balance on repairs and restoration

PER CURIAM. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING We deny each parties’ motion for rehearing,' withdraw our previously-issued opinion, and substitute this opinion in its stead. The defendant, Reginald Johnson, appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedu

The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: Chad M. Johnson appeals the district court's denial of his postsentencing motion to withdraw pleas. He contends he should have been permitted to withdraw his pleas for three reasons: (1) his counsel and the court did not adequately inform him of the registration required by the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA), K.S.A. 22-4901

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Christina Conyers Williams brought the claims in this action against the District of Columbia and other associated defendants under the District of Columbia Whistleblower Act and prevailed before this Court and on appeal. 1

PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEALDenied.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Scott Johnson ("Plaintiff") initiated this action against Defendant Jeri Oishi in his individual and representative capacity as Trustee of the Jeri and Noboru Oishi Trust and Aloha Flowers, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), seeking injunctive relief for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge HaloPolymer Trading filed an 1-140 immigrant petition for the plaintiff, Vladislav Grinin, seeking to classify him as a multinational executive and allow him to remain in the United States as a permanent resident. The agency and the Administrative Appeals Office concluded that there was insufficient reliable evidence showing that Grini

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 14.) Defendants Sami and Nadia Guedoir, and Carthage Trading, Inc., (“Defendants”) oppose Plaintiffs motion on the grounds that Plaintiffs damage claim for multiple visits to Defendan

FISHER, Circuit Judge: On a hot summer day in July 2002, with temperatures over 100 degrees, Leigh Miguel and her uncle, Norman Johnson, were caught smuggling a group of five Mexican children and young adults in a four-door Dodge Stratus near Tucson, Arizona. Miguel had been pulled over by two sheriffs deputies who may have mistakenly believed the car’s registration had expire

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PIERSOL, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs have sought to certify this suit as a class action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(2). Defendants oppose the certification of the class. The issues were briefed and oral argument was held on April 27, 2000. The Court declined to rule on the motion at that time, allowing Defendants to take discovery of the named Plain

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Following a three-day trial, a jury in this Court found that Defendant, the District of Columbia, retaliated against Plaintiff Christina Conyers Williams in violation of the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act (the “DC-WPA”) and awarded Plaintiff $300,000 in damages. Defendant respond

By Judge Stanley p. Klein This case is before the Court on a demurrer by both defendants to all six remaining counts of the Motion for Judgment1: Count I (Sexual Harassment), Count II (Sexual Battery), Count HI (Sexual Assault), Count V (Wrongful Constructive Discharge), Count VI (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress), and Count VH (Respondeat Superior). Defendants also demur to the claim

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. In this action, Plaintiff Christina Conyers Williams (“Williams”) claims that Defendant, the District of Columbia (the “District”), retaliated against her in violation of the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act. More specifically, she alleges that Robert Johnson, the Senior D

MILLER, District Judge. A felony conviction for stealing $12 worth of meat branded Anthony Johnson a “sexual predator” under Illinois law and subjected him to burdens and responsibilities he didn’t have before that conviction. He filed suit contending that the United States Constitution’s ex post facto clause makes at least some of those burdens and responsib

Preston, Judge. {¶ 1} Delinquent-child-appellant, Ritchie Johnson (hereinafter “R.J.”), appeals the judgment of the Allen County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, ordering that he be committed to the Ohio Department of Youth Services (“DYS”). We affirm. {¶ 2} On March 31, 2010, a com