⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Christian Stephen Gallardo”

District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017-05-03 · Published · cited 4× · 259 F. Supp. 3d 1323
ORDER Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 73), Defendant’s Response in 'Opposition (Doc. 83), Plaintiffs reply (Doc." 97), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 77), Plaintiffs amended response in' opposition (Doc. 92)1 and Defendant’s reply (Doc. 108). Additi
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-20 · Published · cited 1× · 606 U.S. 185
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 185–225 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009-05-26 · Published · cited 12× · 621 F. Supp. 2d 1207; 79 Fed. R. Serv. 921; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43879; 2009 WL 1444446
621 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Andreas Jejuan SMITH. Criminal Action No. 07cr165. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. May 26, 2009. *1208 Kevin L. Butler, Christine Ann Freeman, Aylia McKee, Federal Defenders, Middle District of Alabama, Richard Kelly Keith, Keith & Dubin, P.C
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · 2025-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) Revocation of Prior Monument Designations The Antiquities Act of 1906 permits a President to alter a prior declaration of a national monument, including by finding that the “landmarks,” “structures,” or “objects” identi- fied in the prior declaration either never were or no longer are deserving of the Act’s protections; and such an alteration can have the effect of eliminating entirely the reser- vation of the parcel of land previously associated with a nation
People v. Thomkinspublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2020-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/1/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A141375 v. CLEM THOMPKINS et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No
People v. Thompkinspublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2020-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/17/20 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, A141375 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 168583A/B) v. CLEM THOMPKINS et
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993-02-11 · Published · cited 28× · 986 F.2d 728
986 F.2d 728 LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434,Plaintiffs-Appellees,andJessie Oliver, et al., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.William P. CLEMENTS, etc., et al., Defendants.Jim MATTOX, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Appellants,v.Judge F. Harold ENTZ, etc., Judge Sharolyn Wood, etc., andGeorge S. Bayoud, Jr., etc., Defendants-Appellants,andTom Rickhoff, Susan D. Reed, John J. Spec
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-03-06 · Published · cited 0× · 61 F. App'x 690
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 97 F. App'x 305
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.