Cases

LYNCH, Chief Judge. In July 2006, plaintiff Wen Y. Chiang sued his telecommunications company, Verizon New England Inc. (Verizon NE), in state court, alleging in part that the company had billed his account for telephone service he had not ordered. Chiang filed a second state court suit against Verizon NE in February 2007 over a billing dispute triggered by Chiang’s conceded failu

620 F.3d 30 (2010) Wen Y. CHIANG, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MBNA, A Bank of America Company; FIA Card Services, N.A., Defendants, Appellees. No. 09-2323. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard June 9, 2010. Decided September 9, 2010. Dean Carnahan, with whom Law Offices of Dean Carnahan was on brief, for appellant. Terry B. Bates

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2570 TAMARA S. FRAZIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge This litigation arises under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"). In essence, the parties dispute whether Defendant Seterus, Inc. ("Seterus") provided "inaccurate" or "materially misleading" information to the three major credit reporting agencies ("CRAs") in 2016, when Seterus reported Plaintiff Charles Hrebal ("Hrebal") as delinquent on his mortgage, shortly after Hrebal succes

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0106p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER TWUMASI-ANKRAH, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Abdulrahman Alharbi is a twenty-three-year-old student from Saudi Ara*340bia, who resides in Revere, Massachusetts. He was a spectator at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013, was injured in the bombing, and was questioned by federal authorities investigating the e

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION This is an action for the collection of withdrawal liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”). Edward Groden1 brought suit on behalf of the New England Teamsters and Tru

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(6) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DE 23) ANTHONY P. PATTI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. OPINION A. The Court’s Opinion, Order and Judgment This case is brought pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). The parties to this case — Plaintiff on her own behalf and Defendant via counsel — appeared for t

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Plaintiff Khalid Mohamed claims he is in a bind. He knows he has an obligation to make payments on his mortgage, but alleges he does not know whom to pay. None of his purported loan servicers has sufficiently proven to him its authority to collect his payments. Concerned he might pay the

638 F.3d 6 (2011) LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. William M. GARDNER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of New Hampshire, Defendant, Appellee. No. 10-1360. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted November 2, 2010. Decided February 24, 2011. *8 Ga

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LEONARD T. STRAND, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L INTRODUCTION This case is before me on cross-motions (Doc. Nos.13, 14) for summary judgment. Both motions are resisted (Doc. Nos.15, 16)- and defendants have filed a reply (Doc. No, 17) in support of their motion. While defendants have requested oral argument, the issues have been tho

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Clinical Technology, Inc. (CTI), is a specialty distributor of medical products in thé'Midwest. CTI brings this action against Defendant Covidien Sales, LLC, alleging breach of contract (Count I), breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Count II), unjust enrichment (Count III),

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On October 8, 2013, Gevork Grigoryan filed this action against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), Equifax Information Services, LLC (“Equifax”), and Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”) (collectively, “defendants”), alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCR

BLACK, Circuit Judge: Teri Lynn Hinkle appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding, L.L.C., and Encore Capital Group, Inc. (collectively Midland 1 ) for claims asserted by Hinkle under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.,

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. On May 14, 2010, Dr. Carlos R. Alcala (“Plaintiff’) filed this action against Popular Auto, Inc. (“PA”) seeking damages for negligent or willful violations to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq. (Docket No. 1). On August 15, 2011, PA filed a motion for summary judgment (“MSJ”) and a counterclaim against P

777 F.Supp.2d 1193 (2011) Patricia ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. J.C. CHRISTENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 10-4667 (RHK/LIB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 28, 2011. *1194 Lee Cassie Yates, Krohn & Moss, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Susan E. Gustad, Michael A. Klutho, Bassford Remele,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TAURO, District Judge. I. Introduction The basis for this case rests on four letters sent by Defendant Northland Group, Inc. to Marilyn Berger roughly between August 15 and November 16, 2010. Defendant is a debt collector and sent the letters in an attempt to collect on a debt allegedly owed by Marilyn Berger. Plaintiff Karen Berger filed her

748 F.Supp.2d 1030 (2010) Samuel N. EDEH, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-CV-1706 (PJS/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 29, 2010. *1033 Samuel N. Edeh, pro se. Michael A. Klutho and Susan E. Gustad, Bassford Remele, PA, for defendant. ORDER

753 F.Supp.2d 452 (2010) Carmen DIXON-ROLLINS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al. Civil Action No. 09-0646. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 23, 2010. *456 Geoffrey H. Baskerville, John Soumilas, Mark D. Mailman, Francis & Mailman, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Carmen Dixon-Rollins.